by AdamB » Sat 13 Sep 2025, 19:15:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mortifiedpenguin', 'N')ow, I don't know a lot about oil or what it's made of, but that doesn't sound like a bad idea. Assuming we had enough of what is needed to make oil, I think it would work.
Variations of this idea percolated throughout the peak oil world, and reveal an interesting gap in how or what people think "oil" is. They have confused the resource, the oil, with the products that are manufactured from it. Be it gasoline, plastic, drugs, fertilizers whatever.
It was a powerful selling point, Ruppert (he of suicidal nature and died owing people money for his "oversexed in front of his employees" event) used it early on with some angle from Pfeiffer (his "geologist") about "Eating Fossil Fuels".
What is amusing about this angle is it misses the point.
Oil is a resource not because it is inherently interesting, but because it can be used to make stuff. Guess what else you can use to make ANYTHING oil can? Natural gas mostly. When Qatar first used jet fuel produced by Shell from natural gas....Ruppert groupies got a little cranky.
I was always surprised that basic organic chemistry didn't make it onto peak oilers plates. Most of them were pretty one-dimensional. The dumb ones were just...parrots.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"