by galacticsurfer » Tue 14 Nov 2006, 07:43:11
Dissimulo,
Yeah I think I am trying to say something like that about frame of reference. People learn and function well in the society where they live if they are intelligent animals from birth. They are well adjusted to their environment, making them intelligent within that context. Bush is a sly, practical, competitive Texas bastard. His father was a Northeastern aristocratic, fine compromising type, so he was well adjusted to his environment and therefore intelligent. In Texas terms Bush Sr. would be termed a weakling. Why , a man in Texas who isn't willing to take out his gun and shoot before thinking could be dead(ok so the times are over except maybe in heavy traffic). Anger is a survival tool. His manliness has to do with how he carries himself confidently and how aggressive and self confident he can be. Bush plays the perfect Texan.
Kerry for example plays the perfect New Englander. Everything is just talk and has no meaning. Anger is a bad thing. It is like in England. Word plays, intellectual BS. Kerry betrays contempt for people more down to earth(soldiering on boys),although animal intelligence of country folks has nothing to do with wittiness.
When people don't fit in socially, they move away or are ostracizedlike a gay teenager from small town in Iowa going to Frisco, etc. or Dan White not fitting in as firefighter macho in a rapidly changing, increasinlgy liberal and gay San Francisco and killing Harvey Milk.
No I don't live in USA anymore but people are similar everywhere. When we talk politics, it is an average of the social norm in a geographic area. USA is almost too big and climatically and geographically and racially varied to fit any sort of norm. If you had proportional representation as in Europe with a 5% hurdle 4 or 5 parties would make a coalition like in Germany. Greens, former communists, Social conservatives(like Repubs), middle left(like US dems), and free marketers. A two party system is just as much a coalition of interests. Democrat and Republican are both big tents of lots of interest groups.
Dems- minorities, unions, city liberals, gays, envrionmentalists, activists of all sorts
Repubs- religous conservative, rural conservatives, business interests
Intelligence is fitting into to the politics of where you live, adjusting to the demands of your cultural and family interests.
I bet 15 years ago when the winds of change were coming from the right, intelligent politics for the average guy meant tearing down the corrupt democrats who held on to their welfare state, high taxation and passive foreign policy. More free market and risk taking was seen as cool. Democrats belonged to the past. Democratic voters were passive, and stupid inflexible intellectuals clinging to an old system. Now the winds of change come from the left. Markets are not the perfect answer. Globalization is unjust. the top 1% is ripping us all off. The revolution begins anew. Repubs are now stupid inflexible neanderthals who can't see the light of a new age.
The smart people are always on the cutting edge. They see the problems in the system which are getting worse now and being ignored. The sheeple have a lower IQ or just other interests than politics or no access to information. They vote according to the averages of what they can figure out from family, friends, MSM, and usually the same from genertion to generation
Basically the two sides have a pat situation and the political shift is in the middle, independent 30% , in the burbs of our minds, not in the rural or the big city areas where most cultural values are too obvious, too immovable.
"The horror, the horror"