by mousepad » Sat 19 Jul 2025, 06:53:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '
')REALLY? What is it about a reasonable statement, one that even you and I might agree with (we believe in science) grossly disgust you? I have an entire career as a scientist, I can in no way even attempt to DENY such a statement. Never in my career did believing, and doing, and publishing science have anything to do with "deplorables" (whatever that is) or anyone NOT doing science being dumb.
What? You're having me all confused now. That's not at all what I was talking about.
You agree with me a circular definition does not hold up in science? It is not scientific?
You agree with me that the definition of a woman on the webpage of Stanford Medical Education is circular?
You agree with me that it's laughable for such a higher education institution to go with circular definitions?
You agree with me that educational institution are majority in control of liberals/democrat types?
You agree with me that such liberal/democrat types often show yard signs saying "we believe in science"?
You agree with me that all the above has NOTHING to do with self identifying?
That reminds me of some other libtard book from some negro phd about critical race theory. You know, the type of theory the democrats went full into. The phd was celebrated as some type of awakening hero. Reading the book he has the definition of racism in the book: A racists is somebody who is a racist (I don't remember exact wording). In a supposedly scientific book. From a phd. Laugh my ass off. I guess the guy got a phd not despite his skin color but because of it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mousepad', '
') The problem is women are a protected species.
Yeah, I think my wife and daugther might not like that particular angle. They aren't a different species, and object to the idea of needing the protection from us he-man types.