Will Nuclear Fusion Soon Be The "Norm?"Key Words "The dream of humanity"
"Spurred by the failures of wind and solar"
"$60 million state fund" (slush fund)
"The new method... is a game changer" (it's better this time)
"hope is that fusion energy will the “norm” as early as the mid-1930s."
That last point is what makes this news so credible, the claim to be 10 years out in the future. Which is, as any armchair expert on Nuclear fusion knows, the proper timeline. Fusion power is always just 10 years in the future. No more, no less. 10 is a workable number, $10 will get you a feed, put some gas in the car, buy you a pack of cigarettes. In the public consciousness 10 is not too big and not too small, it goes by unobserved doesn't it? When it's spend, so what! There is always another 10 there on hand.
What are we talking about here? Cold fusion? Hot? Lukewarm Fusion. Ahhhh, you'll have to read the report/article/sales pitch to see.
https://realclearwire.com/articles/2025 ... 10139.htmlA brief
montage of Oooo, Ahhhh, for the techno dreamers to salivate over. "California-based", just remember that, and "Los Alamos National Laboratory" Totally TechnoCool.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..to imitate the forces that created their habitat has been alive for at least as far back as the time when humans with a single language decided to build a city with a tower that reached the heavens...
build on Enrico Fermi’s discovery that neutrons could split atoms to recognize that splitting atoms would release significant energy...
California-based TAE Technologies has been developing a reactor that runs on proton-boron aneutronic fusion – that is, a fusion reaction that fuses a hydrogen nucleus with non-radioactive boron-11...
New research at the University of Texas, in conjunction with Los Alamos National Laboratory and Type One Energy Group, uses symmetry theory to help engineers design magnetic confinement systems