Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Wed 17 Nov 2021, 21:06:48

Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover gave an amazing speech in 1957 that predicted many of the energy-related issues we are now dealing with. https://ourfiniteworld.com/2007/07/02/s ... -peak-oil/

Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover is known as the father of the nuclear submarine. He was also instrumental in getting the United States started using nuclear power to generate electricity. He was an advisor to Jimmy Carter, who is known for his interest in renewable energy. The world would no doubt be much different if we had listened to Mr. Rickover’s ideas from more than 50 years ago and acted on them.

Excerpts:
-With high energy consumption goes a high standard of living.

-Whether this Golden Age will continue depends entirely upon our ability to keep energy supplies in balance with the needs of our growing population.

-A reduction of per capita energy consumption has always in the past led to a decline in civilization and a reversion to a more primitive way of life.

-The earth is finite. Fossil fuels are not renewable. In this respect our energy base differs from that of all earlier civilizations. They could have maintained their energy supply by careful cultivation. We cannot.

-For it is an unpleasant fact that according to our best estimates, total fossil fuel reserves recoverable at not over twice today’s unit cost, are likely to run out at some time between the years 2000 and 2050, if present standards of living and population growth rates are taken into account.

-I suggest that this is a good time to think soberly about our responsibilities to our descendants – those who will ring out the Fossil Fuel Age.


Well guess what folks, we didn't get the memo and we missed the boat
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Thu 18 Nov 2021, 00:28:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', '
')Well guess what folks, we didn't get the memo and we missed the boat


Not rich boomers who can afford pricey motorcycles like you Lucky! You've got it made, just like you've said!

So why all the whining? Let the rest eat cake, isn't that what you just said your "get yours" generation is happily doing?
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby ROCKMAN » Thu 18 Nov 2021, 16:52:18

Not to take anything away from Hyman but as I've pointed out many times over the YEARS this was the common anticipation amongst my experienced cohorts when I began as a petroleum geologist in 1975. My mentor at that time predicted the shit hitting the fan not to long after 2000. Just a rough guess he admitted but regardless of the exact timing it was inevitable. One has to wonder if Hyman gained some of his insight after reading the predictions published by a well known geologist in the 1950's.

The exact timing would be determined by a number of unpredictable factors. But the eventuality of PO itself was very predictable. Even to a 25 year old graduate student. But, then again, I was doing my master's degree under a professor who had retired after 35 years in the oil patch. He had all his student gather at his house one evening every week for pizza, beer, and modeling PO. Didn't really impact my thinking very much at the time. But after 5 or so years struggling to find significant oil/NG accumulations it became much more apparent.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby gollum » Fri 19 Nov 2021, 11:17:07

What a speech his insight in to history and predictions for the future were uncanny.
gollum
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Wyoming

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Fri 19 Nov 2021, 22:25:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gollum', 'W')hat a speech his insight in to history and predictions for the future were uncanny.


If all the other peak oil claimants had used half a century time spans to bracket their predictions, they wouldn't have ended up with so much egg on face and poisoned the entire concept.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby evilgenius » Sat 20 Nov 2021, 11:12:12

I think John Michael Greer, that Archdruid guy, talked about a long, slow collapse. Kunstler gets into some of that. They both rely on a sense of nostalgia to get their points across. They each want to rely upon going back to the past in order to face the future. Rickover is much more optimistic and forward facing. He was the same way about seeing how we might, eventually, get out from under the Cold War. He was more of a risk taker, I guess.
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Wed 18 Dec 2024, 17:06:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'I') think John Michael Greer, that Archdruid guy, talked about a long, slow collapse. Kunstler gets into some of that. They both rely on a sense of nostalgia to get their points across. They each want to rely upon going back to the past in order to face the future.

Quite! I used to listen to those guys but at some point I came to the conclusion they were just aging Boomers looking for a fix so they could live out their latter years in comfort and security rather than the Hunger Games scenario. Each have written novels depicting a transition back to horse and cart and local farming, but with a sprinkling of solar panels so that their personal business models, feeding off income derived from internet denizens, could continue. It's a futile exercise in wishful thinking, a whistling past the graveyard but it sold books.

There simply is no going back from a collapse in energy abundance, as all the empires across recorded history clearly show. What happens, always happens, is a total collapse and abandonment of the collapsing system and a long period of anarchy. The very idea that our technology is a buffer against this is ludicrous since a simple loss of the electricity, or fuel networks, would instantly cripple every society across the Western World and doom a Billion people to a quick death. A good solar flare and associated CME would do it and you wouldn't even know it had occurred until you flicked the light switch or tried to start your modern car. What backup is there to feed the millions in our cities? To pump water in, transport food in? It takes roughly 20 years to transition to a new system of mass transport or energy production and that is with the new system working at full pace to bring it about. I don't see millions of horses waiting outside the cities to take over the duties of the 18-wheelers. There is Zero redundancy built into our societies.

We actually would have been a lot better off as a species if the digital computer had never been invented, or for that matter if oil had never accumulated in the ground. From my look at the history of the industrial revolution we were doing just fine on steam power. That coupled with electricity was transforming our lives and I have no doubt we would have eventually achieved much of what makes life great today with just those alone. Even a moonshot would have been possible, certainly modern transport and energy networks, medical advancements and the like. What we would have avoided was nations choked with cars and trucks, the internet of thieves and pornographers. Could I live without the internet and modern digital devices? I spent the first 30 years of my life without them and lived a very good life in the process. There was nothing wrong with bank books and cash, home phones, mechanical cash registers. No one complained and it was nice to go out for the day and not worry about the cares of the world because you didn't have a mobile in your pocket.

It's too late to go back I'm afraid but it's never too late to shun some of the more invasive aspects of the techno now. I'm off for a ride, I'll pack a cell phone, for all the good it will do me where I'm going, but it won't be turned on! My phone is never turned on when I travel, in the car or on the bikes. It's a simple matter of not being addicted, of going your own way and not the way the modern world dictates as acceptable.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Wed 18 Dec 2024, 21:23:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'R')ear Admiral Hyman Rickover gave an amazing speech in 1957 that predicted many of the energy-related issues we are now dealing with. https://ourfiniteworld.com/2007/07/02/s ... -peak-oil/

Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover is known as the father of the nuclear submarine.


Rickover was certainly a real American. Can you imagine? He got a nuke sub built that Australians nearly 70 years later...can't. They can even buy the BLUEPRINTS from one of the Great Nations they suckle at the teat of, and STILL don't have what it takes to build a SINGLE knock off copy of 70 year old technology.

Thanks for pointing out some American exceptionalism Lucky....now...how about we talk about an Australian educational system that creates cretins all agog at American exceptionalism like you?
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby yellowcanoe » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 00:22:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '
')
Rickover was certainly a real American. Can you imagine? He got a nuke sub built that Australians nearly 70 years later...can't. They can even buy the BLUEPRINTS from one of the Great Nations they suckle at the teat of, and STILL don't have what it takes to build a SINGLE knock off copy of 70 year old technology.

Thanks for pointing out some American exceptionalism Lucky....now...how about we talk about an Australian educational system that creates cretins all agog at American exceptionalism like you?


When is the US going to build a nuclear powered ice breaker? Russia built their first one in 1957 and currently operate seven of them.
"new housing construction" is spelled h-a-b-i-t-a-t d-e-s-t-r-u-c-t-i-o-n.
yellowcanoe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri 15 Nov 2013, 14:42:27
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 05:23:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yellowcanoe', 'W')hen is the US going to build a nuclear powered ice breaker? Russia built their first one in 1957 and currently operate seven of them.


The British came into WWII with the world's greatest fleet of redundant old battleships and the US has just copied them down the line :P The Russians and Chinese are probably seeding the oceans with autonomous torpedoes, all with US sub signatures embedded in their brains. They can just float there under the surface waiting for their billion dollar targets to sail by.

adam is right and he is wrong. We could have built whatever we wanted, certainly we have the Uranium and we have the high tech. We had a budding rocket industry back in the 1950's but we discarded it, why reinvent the wheel? It all comes down to practical reality, we only have a small population, 26 million at today's count. You can't fund a massive war machine on such a small tax base and still provide good infrastructure across a nation the size of the continental US. So we let the yanks pay for it all and we got on with the business of building beautiful cities and highway networks.

The world has been at peace all this time and the people of Australia have enjoyed the fruits of that while the US population has been on a knife edge of fear over Russia, over China now. Well they should fear I suppose, they are the target, the target of hatred for billions of people. It's just a pity the people themselves live in such squalor now. What kind of a life is it if you can't safely walk your streets after dark, if your children are at risk of school massacres?

North Korea has a good nuclear program too, but it's hardly the kind of place you'd want to live in as an ordinary citizen. Come to think of it, all the nations with nuclear arsenals are miserable places now; France, Britain, India, Pakistan, Israel, Russia. None of them are free, all are rife with poverty and typically overrun with immigrants. Thank God they are all in the northern hemisphere, by the time the fallout bleeds across the tropic zone most of the dangerous stuff will have fallen out. Chernobyl proved that, as did Fukushima.

Image

Japan. A gift that just keeps on giving

Image

Image
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 10:25:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yellowcanoe', '
')When is the US going to build a nuclear powered ice breaker?

Any time it wants to. Or collects some ice locked ports above the Arctic circle and needs them. Which won't be happening anytime soon unless it decides to take over some country and then keep their ports open for them.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yellowcanoe', '
')Russia built their first one in 1957 and currently operate seven of them.

When is Russia going to build a nuclear powered aircraft carrier? The Russians can't even keep any of their navy operating across international waters without a recovery tug going along with them. They had certainly better keep their nuke surface ships close to shore and moving slowly breaking ice.

Oh...and the US has 11 nuke aircraft carriers. And when one of them sails, it isn't with ocean going tugs to tow them home. It looks more like this.

Image

See any recovery tugs in there? Yeah, me neither.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby yellowcanoe » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 13:47:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', '
')
Japan. A gift that just keeps on giving

Image[/img]


The Fukushima Radioactive Fallout map that you posted is a fake! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nuclear-fallout-map/
"new housing construction" is spelled h-a-b-i-t-a-t d-e-s-t-r-u-c-t-i-o-n.
yellowcanoe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri 15 Nov 2013, 14:42:27
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby yellowcanoe » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 13:54:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', '
')
Oh...and the US has 11 nuke aircraft carriers. And when one of them sails, it isn't with ocean going tugs to tow them home. It looks more like this.

Image

See any recovery tugs in there? Yeah, me neither.

There's just one problem with this picture. The carriers can operate for 20 years between refueling but the USN stopped building nuclear powered escort vessels and ones it did build have been retired. A carrier can be rerouted on a moments notice to anywhere in the world and get there at 30+ knots but the escort vessels cannot follow along until arrangements are in place to refuel them along the way.
"new housing construction" is spelled h-a-b-i-t-a-t d-e-s-t-r-u-c-t-i-o-n.
yellowcanoe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri 15 Nov 2013, 14:42:27
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 14:15:43

What good are capital ships unless your enemy is at sea?

Image

America has blown its wad on WWII tech, WWIII will be fought with missiles and drones. We have seen how effective the US carrier fleet is, the Hooties have scared it out of the gulf with their drones :oops:

So why do they continue to waste money on it? Entrenched corporate interests of course. The Admirals and congress work for them while in public office, they see that funds are spent on the shipyards and other suppliers. Then at retirement they give them lucrative consulting positions. The entire public structure of the US is corrupt, corrupt to the core. Traitors all of them basically.

Rickover did good work, as did LeMay, they oversaw a needed transition, they got it done! All the leaders since then have been worms.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 14:47:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yellowcanoe', '
')The Fukushima Radioactive Fallout map that you posted is a fake! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nuclear-fallout-map/

So that particular map was fake, lets not split hairs over it. Radiation did cross the Pacific.

NLM
Radioactive fallout in the United States due to the Fukushima nuclear plant accident
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')mong the various radionuclides released, iodine -131 ((131)I) and cesium isotopes ((137)Cs and (134)Cs) were transported across the Pacific Ocean and reached the United States on 17-18 March 2011
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22456673/

It was no big deal of course, but the image was posted simply to show the direction radiation in the northern hemisphere travels. It doesn't travel South :P
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Thu 19 Dec 2024, 18:22:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'W')hat good are capital ships unless your enemy is at sea?

Who has the world's largest Air Force? The US Air Force.
Who has the world's second largest Air Force? The US Navy

What might US Naval Aviation do if its targets are on land? I suppose....the same thing they would do if they happen to be at sea?

The combat radius of a US nuclear carrier battle group is about 500 miles. In other words, from over the horizon, they could flatten Brisbane, Syndey, Melbourne, Adelaide, Perth, and Hobart just for practice for new aviators. All at the same time.

They could do this day and night for a week or two, just in case there happen to be some neonazi hiding in holes that came out, until an aviator got a hangnail and needed a quick replacement from the OTHER 5 carrier battle groups lounging around picking their noses because all Australia could do to stop them is whine to their King and ask them to intervene on their behalf.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby theluckycountry » Fri 20 Dec 2024, 02:52:04

You're in flyover country adam, far from the fallout. All you deplorables need worry about is the loss of your food stamps.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Fri 20 Dec 2024, 22:31:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'Y')ou're in flyover country adam, far from the fallout.

Indeed. The US Navy can't reach me from a carrier. But Third Worlders like you who suckled at the teat of a Queen for nearly your entire life...all you learned how to do was fall down and cry.

It isn't like you even know how to fight back, still suffering from great great grandad got sent to the Australian slammer for being mentally retarded and forcing himself upon a maiden who wanted nothing to do with birthing more idiots into the world. I'm sorry that your DNA has been compromised so heavily by your ancestors. Maybe you can be reincarnated as an American next time?
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AgentR11 » Mon 23 Dec 2024, 10:05:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', 'W')hen is Russia going to build a nuclear powered aircraft carrier? The Russians can't even keep any of their navy operating across international waters without a recovery tug going along with them. They had certainly better keep their nuke surface ships close to shore and moving slowly breaking ice.


1. Russia has no mission for an Aircraft Carrier, just as we have no mission for a nuclear icebreaker. I'd love to see them waste resources building one, but it would be a laughably foolish expenditure.

2. A recovery tug is necessary when you don't have friendly ports of call. Few friends, few ports, definitely the wise move, regardless of any quality issues. Nothing would please Russia's enemies more than to "salvage" a disabled warship. lol.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')h...and the US has 11 nuke aircraft carriers. And when one of them sails, it isn't with ocean going tugs to tow them home. It looks more like this.


We have friendly ports to call at in case of emergency. Thus no need. Russia is having challenges just getting their ex-Syrian detachment back home. Its a long sail back to Murmansk surrounded by unfriendly ports, and wrapped in unfriendly weather.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Hyman Rickover's 1957 speech

Postby AdamB » Mon 23 Dec 2024, 10:39:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', 'W')hen is Russia going to build a nuclear powered aircraft carrier? The Russians can't even keep any of their navy operating across international waters without a recovery tug going along with them. They had certainly better keep their nuke surface ships close to shore and moving slowly breaking ice.


1. Russia has no mission for an Aircraft Carrier, just as we have no mission for a nuclear icebreaker. I'd love to see them waste resources building one, but it would be a laughably foolish expenditure.


Indeed. Russia is not a global sea power. Only the USA is.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '
')2. A recovery tug is necessary when you don't have friendly ports of call.

And when your shit breaks every time it sets to sea. Do you have any knowledge of an American nuke carrier ever needing to be towed in from its station because it broke down?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')h...and the US has 11 nuke aircraft carriers. And when one of them sails, it isn't with ocean going tugs to tow them home. It looks more like this.


We have friendly ports to call at in case of emergency. Thus no need.
If your shit breaks down, sure there is a need. And as the only global sea power in the world, you are right about more friendly ports than not. Ever heard of an American carrier breaking down and needing towed to a friendly port?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '
') Russia is having challenges just getting their ex-Syrian detachment back home.

Indeed. And recently challenges in Ukraine have revealed that Russia is a 2nd rate military power. In Ukraine.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', '
') Its a long sail back to Murmansk surrounded by unfriendly ports, and wrapped in unfriendly weather.
And when you build shit that doesn't work as it is supposed to, it isn't a long sail anywhere, but just a long tow. Do the Russians have any ocean going recovery tugs that are nuclear? Those would sure be as handy as nuke ice breakers in the Arctic.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."

Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
User avatar
AdamB
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 11018
Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
Top

Next

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron