Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Race to buy expensive oil, why America will lose.

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Race to buy expensive oil, why America will lose.

Unread postby Yamaha_R6 » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 05:59:52

As far as I know, oil is traded in U.S. dollars.

Also it seems the United States is going bankrupt, what keeps the value of our currency is that China and other Asain markets are buying up our dollars to keep the dollar strong so we can buy more of their goods.


Lets look at a senario in which gasoline is 5$ a gallon by 2008. The Third world goes to hell because they cannot afford gas, and America laughs because we are so rich we can afford to pay it as long as we conserve and carpool.

This would be when the Asain's decide to dump all of their U.S. dollars, only they would spending these dollars to get oil, as we all know oil is traded in U.S. dollars. Since the Asains have so much of them, they in a sense... have a lot of oil. (they just havent claimed it yet).

Of course... with all these dollars released all at once, the dollar will inflate and its value will go down. Since the dollar is now worth less, Americans will now have to pay even MORE to get oil.

BUT WAIT, since the dollar has gone down, the Yen, and other Asain currencies will be WORTH MORE IN RELATION, meaning they will have greater buying power, and will be able to buy EVEN MORE U.S. Dollars in which to buy more oil.

With all the oil and a strong currency, the Asians, specifically China will get stronger and stronger while the U.S. gets weaker.

But it doesn't end here. Many of you will say if China destroys the United States, they destroy themselves, as they need us to buy their goods.

Let me ask.... are you absolutly sure that will be the case in the future? Seems to me the Chinese could just sell their goods to themselves, after all, they have 1 billion people to sell to locally, why waste energy transporting goods to the U.S. when you can sell at home. This worked fine for the Americans for many years.

This might not work now and def. wouldn't have in the past, as the Chinese are too poor to buy all the goods they produce, but that is changing. Since more of them have better jobs, more education, and more money, their own market is stronger, and will be much stronger in the future, it is possible the U.S. market could be small and un-important in relation in the future.

All the wealth will be in China since the U.S. dollar will now be worth nothing, and we will no longer be able to pay as much for oil as they will. In the end, they will buy all the oil and leave us to stew in our own failure.

Even worst they could just start trading oil in the Asian currency and cut us out all together, and since the U.S. dollar wont be worth anything, we wont have the money to buy any of their currency in which to buy oil. China is going to KICK our ASS so badly.


Am i dead-on with my assesment or am i smoking crack?
User avatar
Yamaha_R6
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Race to buy expensive oil, why America will lose.

Unread postby Doly » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 06:05:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yamaha_R6', 'M')any of you will say if China destroys the United States, they destroy themselves, as they need us to buy their goods.

Let me ask.... are you absolutly sure that will be the case in the future? Seems to me the Chinese could just sell their goods to themselves, after all, they have 1 billion people to sell to locally, why waste energy transporting goods to the U.S. when you can sell at home. This worked fine for the Americans for many years.


I don't think the Chinese could sell to themselves their exports in the near future. But there is a difference between "the USA" and "the whole of the developed world" that the Americans often fail to notice. The Chinese can sell to Europe, and in fact, they have been switching to make more and more business with Europe and less with the USA in the last couple of years. I think this is highly significative.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby jimmydean » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 08:49:52

It's definitely plausible but won't happen anytime soon. Why would China interrupt this flow of U.S. dollar investment at this point?

Maybe in another 10 years when the Yuan has gained every more strength vs. the dollar and we start seeing a growing middle class that can replace the American consumer.
User avatar
jimmydean
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby linlithgowoil » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 10:47:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his would be when the Asain's decide to dump all of their U.S. dollars, only they would spending these dollars to get oil, as we all know oil is traded in U.S. dollars. Since the Asains have so much of them, they in a sense... have a lot of oil. (they just havent claimed it yet).



but they're already spending all their us dollars to get oil, then buying more dollars to buy more oil? i fail to see how anyone can outbid the US with the US's own currency - it cant happen.

the US collapsing would be even worse for asian economies - they will do everything in their power to stop that happening, as it would be suicide for them also. it is in no ones interest for the US to have an economic crash - it would wreck the world economy in a matter of weeks. there'll be no 'dumping' of US debt - it cant and wont happen.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland

Unread postby MicroHydro » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 14:19:10

If China were to give all their workers credit cards and keep the interest rates low, they could sell as much production domestically as desired.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Race to buy expensive oil, why America will lose.

Unread postby spot5050 » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 18:27:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yamaha_R6', 'L')ets look at a senario in which gasoline is 5$ a gallon by 2008

Is that the only scenario you have looked at?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yamaha_R6', 'A')m i dead-on with my assesment or am i smoking crack?

ROFL!
spot5050
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Cheshire, England

Unread postby Kingcoal » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 19:27:39

You are neither dead on nor smoking crack (unless you really are smoking crack.) The big mistake that people often make when they try to predict the future is forget that everything is in flux. Everything, meaning the instantaneous value of this and that. Nothing really has any value by itself, value has to be added. This is true of currencies, equities, etc. Economic conditions add value to things. For instance currently there is a huge demand, worldwide for light sweet crude to be used for making everything from distillate fuels to plastics. America's huge per capita consumption and the lighting fast rise of China have doubled the price of oil. This situation is unsustainable and the price per barrel will go as high as is necessary to bring consumption in line with supply.

What we worry about on this site is dramatic supply disruption caused by a sudden drop off in production of one or more of the big reservoirs (such as Ghawar in Saudi Arabia.) Free markets tend to be self regulating under gradually changing conditions. However, successive shocks can cause the normal free market process to become disorderly.

The USA has a fantastic track record at adding value to its products and services. China is the opposite, preferring to destroy their competition with rock bottom pricing. As you can tell, I'm not impressed with China. In fact, I'm worried about what China will do when it can no longer maintain +7% annual growth. Without this manic pace of growth, their economy, as it is designed right now, will collapse.
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Unread postby smiley » Tue 02 Aug 2005, 19:34:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't think the Chinese could sell to themselves their exports in the near future. But there is a difference between "the USA" and "the whole of the developed world" that the Americans often fail to notice. The Chinese can sell to Europe, and in fact, they have been switching to make more and more business with Europe and less with the USA in the last couple of years. I think this is highly significative.


True, but they don't only sell to Europe, they also sell to the rest of the world. According to the 2004 figures the exports to the US only represent 20% of China's total exports.

It is an important 20%, but it is not like China is 'totally' dependent on exports to the US.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Race to buy expensive oil, why America will lose.

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 15:20:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yamaha_R6', 'B')ut it doesn't end here. Many of you will say if China destroys the United States, they destroy themselves, as they need us to buy their goods.

Let me ask.... are you absolutly sure that will be the case in the future? Seems to me the Chinese could just sell their goods to themselves, after all, they have 1 billion people to sell to locally, why waste energy transporting goods to the U.S. when you can sell at home. This worked fine for the Americans for many years.

Am i dead-on with my assesment or am i smoking crack?


I am one of those who thinks that China is helpless without access to the US camp, but you brought up a lot of things I hadn't considered before.

You could have uncovered the long-term China strategy vis-a-vis the US--lull the US into a false sense of security ("They'll never invade Taiwan because they need access to the US market"), then.... wham!

Like a thief in the night, the US suffers economic SHTF. China buys up some oil with it's US dollars but then find themselves with a lot more access to capital because of its appreciated Yuan.

No, you're not smoking crack, you're thinking outside the box. You're better than 99% of the idiotic talking heads on TV who like to talk about the wonders of globalization, etc.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 15:24:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', 'I')t is an important 20%, but it is not like China is 'totally' dependent on exports to the US.


I think the important numbers are the trade surpluses have with the rest of the world. If we could break down China's trade surplus, does it's surplus with the US exceed 20%? I would guess that the answer would be a resounding yes.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 15:37:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he USA has a fantastic track record at adding value to its products and services. China is the opposite, preferring to destroy their competition with rock bottom pricing. As you can tell, I'm not impressed with China. In fact, I'm worried about what China will do when it can no longer maintain +7% annual growth. Without this manic pace of growth, their economy, as it is designed right now, will collapse.


That is the key to China's competitive advantage--a large unemployed work force willing to work for 20 cents an hour. I come from Northern Ontario originally where the unemployment rate is well over 25% in many areas. I understand the old maxim, "A job is a job is a job".

Although I was impressed with the original poster, I still think that China's emergence as an "economic superpower" to be a lot of hot air. In many ways, China's poverty was/is artificial--you have a bright, energetic people and yet they are dirt poor. A lot of talking heads and business men like to go on TV and reassure the public that "China is an important market for the USA's economic growth". Of course that is pure bullsh*t--capital is flowing out of the US-->China far more than from China-->US. It is only an important labor market for those who import Chinese-made products.

Because of the trade deficit, China has been able to bribe politicians (Clinton) to purchase missile technology, expand its nuclear arsenal and almost buy an American oil giant (Unocal) with American dollars.

What happens when that gravy train stops? Will China be able to replace its trade surplus it had with the US and look to Europe to open its markets? The social democratic parties of Europe would be committing political suicide if they agreed to this. The original poster said that China could sell its products to themselves, but their industry is based on cheap labour, if the Yuan increases in value, their cheap labor becomes not-so-cheap after a while and then their exports (trade surplus) will diminish. Where will they get the excess capital to purchase energy on the world market?
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby smiley » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 15:44:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think the important numbers are the trade surpluses have with the rest of the world. If we could break down China's trade surplus, does it's surplus with the US exceed 20%? I would guess that the answer would be a resounding yes.


The trade surplus defines economic growth. While I think that is important I don't think it is the most important number.

The total volume of trade is the number to watch as it is related to the factory output and thus to employment. It tells you whether the average Chinese worker still has a job to go back to when the US economy were to tank.

Sure a US recession would slash Chinese economic growth and probably cause a recession. However it would not lead to mass unemployment and a collapse of China's internal market.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Unread postby ab0di » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 17:12:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ure a US recession would slash Chinese economic growth and probably cause a recession. However it would not lead to mass unemployment and a collapse of China's internal market.


An interesting article on the Chinese economy. I wonder what the effect of a Chinese recession/depression would have on the US economy.

From an interesting web site on China from UC Berkeley.
ab0di
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun 03 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Iowa
Top

Unread postby MD » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 17:25:09

Isn't real national material wealth better measured by infrastructure, manufacturing capacity, food production, and raw material?
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby MrBean » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 17:31:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', '
')
It is an important 20%, but it is not like China is 'totally' dependent on exports to the US.



IIRC before the Soviet collapse 30-40% of Finnish exports went to USSR, after the collapse there was a deep depression but now Finland is on the top of the world in many international comparisons.

Of course the situations are not fully analogical, but this is close enough historical example to lend support to your claim.

BTW currently EU is China's biggest trade partner, Japan second and US comes third, and the relative weight of US trade keeps diminishing, probably even more so now that Yuan is no more fixed to dollar but a basket of currencies.
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MrBean » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 17:54:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MagnoliaFan', '
')What happens when that gravy train stops? Will China be able to replace its trade surplus it had with the US and look to Europe to open its markets? The social democratic parties of Europe would be committing political suicide if they agreed to this. The original poster said that China could sell its products to themselves, but their industry is based on cheap labour, if the Yuan increases in value, their cheap labor becomes not-so-cheap after a while and then their exports (trade surplus) will diminish. Where will they get the excess capital to purchase energy on the world market?



The so called social democratic parties of Europe (in fact Third Way "neoliberalism with human face" parties, nothing socialist about them) committed political suicide ages ago.

In 2004 China's trade surplus with EU was about € 80 billion (from €175 billion trade), and is rapidly widening (2000: -48.610; 2001: -51.065; 2002: -54.737; 2003: -64.228; 2004 -78.698) . China is EU's number two trade partner, after US.

http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/issues/ ... dex_en.htm

Edit to add:
US trade deficit with China in 2004 was $ 160 billion, still quite a lot compared to EU's $ 100 billion.
Last edited by MrBean on Thu 04 Aug 2005, 18:26:06, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MrBean » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 18:13:49

Very telling picture:

Image

Even with weakening dollar, US trade deficit has kept on widening at same horrible rate. Also against the euroland of Western Europe, by 14% from 2003 to 2004. So energy costs is one main reason (deficit with OPEC up 40%), but not the only.
http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfe ... ct20050210
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 14:31:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ab0di', 'A')n interesting article on the Chinese economy. I wonder what the effect of a Chinese recession/depression would have on the US economy.


On the surface, one would think that China's misery would be the USA's gain, but...

Maybe something like this might happen: http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-8-5/30975.html
Last edited by MagnoliaFan on Fri 05 Aug 2005, 14:40:14, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MagnoliaFan » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 14:38:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', 'T')he so called social democratic parties of Europe (in fact Third Way "neoliberalism with human face" parties, nothing socialist about them) committed political suicide ages ago.


Don't underestimate the Europeans--especially the French when it comes to throwing a monkey wrench into the NWO/globalist agenda from time to time (witness the French "no" victory on the EU constitution)[/quote]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 2004 China's trade surplus with EU was about € 80 billion (from €175 billion trade), and is rapidly widening (2000: -48.610; 2001: -51.065; 2002: -54.737; 2003: -64.228; 2004 -78.698) . China is EU's number two trade partner, after US.

http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/issues/ ... dex_en.htm

Edit to add:
US trade deficit with China in 2004 was $ 160 billion, still quite a lot compared to EU's $ 100 billion.


If China were to lose their trade deficit with the US--Europe would have to agree to lower its import quotas significantly to make up the difference, and THAT would be political suicide.

We're told that the EU has a greater GDP than the US over and over again, then why isn't their trade deficit as great as the US? The $100 million deficit that EU has with China is probably the maximum that the Europeans will tolerate politically.
User avatar
MagnoliaFan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby DantesPeak » Fri 05 Aug 2005, 14:58:07

As already implied above, the dollar is vunerable to a sudden loss of purchasing power because foreign countries have already accumulated a large amount of US dollars - and the amount of the new dollars flooding the world monetary system is huge and accelerating rapidly.

Indeed, the ability of the US to maintain its high standard of living rests on the smooth functioning of the dollar based world trade system - which is kept in place by the US based world trade institutions and the generally perceived superiority of the US military.

The current account deficit, which is now growing at a $900 billion a year annual rate, can only be financed at low interest rates when confidence in the dollar is high. Indeed, confidence is extreme - the total amount of worlwide savings available is estimated by some distinguished economists at $1 trillion - which doesn't leave much to the rest of the world.

As long as all those new dollars are accepted, and old dollars held, the the US can outbid the rest of the world for energy.

Everything changes when those dollars are no longer accepted or held. One does not need an advanced economics degree to see the entire $US system fails to work when those $900 billion of new dollars are not accepted every year.

The yuan revaluation was a kind of 'Trojan Horse' to switch Chinese dollars into Euros, Yen, while the markets were distracted with a public statement that nothing changed. Many other countries have made more public acknowledgement of their switch to Euros, yen.

The day of reckoning draws nearer by the day. Keep in mind when foreigners start to accept less dollars, that means the US will be able to buy less with dollars probably also worth less - i.e. less oil will be imported. It is very easy to imagine an energy crisis developing from a dollar crisis.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Next

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron