by theluckycountry » Wed 08 Mar 2023, 11:59:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')For some reason the airline industry works to different standards and processes. And they seem to be doing better. So a alternative may be to put the railroads ad rail passenger traffic (including subways and light rail, etc.) under the same airline management system.
You are no doubt right about those metro lines there, here our railways are managed by the state governments with cooperation between them for trains that cross state lines. Vandalism on trains, is nothing sacred? I haven't heard of that here, I guess people are too busy, though graffiti is a big thing on freight cars left parked.
I sort of
get the high airline safety standards, they are often global arrangements aren't they, and when a plane crashes it's a very big deal in peoples' minds. A train crash doesn't seem as dramatic, to me at least, so perhaps it was public pressure back in the early days? One thing I know is that when the rich are involved there is a completely different set of standards. I listened to a podcast last month where an Indian investigator was talking about how India's rural health system has gone backwards over the past decades but that they spent an inordinate amount of money during covid disinfecting planes (not trains).
He said it was because the wealthier people always travel by air. And when your talking wealthier you're talking politicians, their friends and family. Yes I know there are a lot on average income earners on plains flying in the west, but there is always a proportion of seats carrying corporate types and the wealthy, up in first class. These people must be protected, just in the same way that the suburbs they live in have a stronger police presence. It wouldn't surprise me at all newfie if one day they segregated the airlines into first-class flights and economy flights. We sort of have that now with all the private jets up there. Anyway, it's just a random thought.
People like Jim kunstler have been banging on forever about rebuilding the nations' railways for passenger travel but I always thought, Why? The lockdowns over the magic virus and the measures now being in introduced in the UK to prevent people from moving too far from their place of residence point to an obvious pattern to me. Keep the plebeians near their jobs, no need to have them traipsing all over the countryside. Communist Russia did this to good effect with their internal passports, China? Either way in a future of scarce resources people are going to have to give up the tourist mentality that we have been enjoying for 100 years. Why facilitate it by building a fantastic rail network.
I certainly have no crystal ball but you don't need one to see the general trends of the next 50 years. Whatever relies on oil or gas or coal today will be going going, gone tomorrow. And that includes most plane flights, most asphalt and concrete roads, and most expensive steel rail networks. We built those networks with cheap labor but also with cheap to produce steel and timber. Today the forests are as depleted as the ore bodies for the iron and concrete ties are not cheap either once you see how they are made. But I'm getting ahead of myself, the city north of me is building new rail lines hand over fist to service the emerging outer suburbs and has been for decades now. Having the Olympics there in 2032 helped this along I'm sure.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The Melbourne to Brisbane Inland Rail is an Australian Government project to upgrade and construct a 1,700km freight railway which will see express trains making the journey between Tottenham in Melbourne and Acacia Ridge in Brisbane in less than 24 hours once completed
')Cross River Rail is a new 10.2 kilometre rail line from Dutton Park to Bowen Hills, which includes 5.9 kilometres of twin tunnels under the Brisbane River and CBD