by The_Toecutter » Sun 04 Sep 2022, 23:04:19
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'S')ounds like a classic case of disconnect on the part of those making the rules. Rather than admit the economic realities, just ignore them. I'm surprised especially that you are implying that the limits on occupant numbers are enforced. As far as I know, in Europe even though such limits may exist, they are seldom enforced, and it's one of the things that keep homelessness at manageable levels.
In most of the US, including rural areas, there are "minimum square footage" rules when it comes to building homes, along with restrictions on where you can place trailers or RVs(restrictions which force someone to rent a plot of land for the cost of a small apartment). That square footage in many places is now over 2,000 sq ft for new construction, which is excessive. The reason? This increases the cost to build homes and the value thereof, and as a result, the municipalities that put these laws into place(more often than not without any voter approval) get more property tax revenue per unit. Occupancy limits are designed to also increase that revenue, by increasing the number of shelter spaces that MUST be rented to fulfill peoples' needs. Meanwhile, the Walmarts and the Amazons are often given property tax exemptions.
It also doesn't help that necessities such as shelter have been turned into a pyramid scheme by the FED and major banks, which is an even larger cause of the problem regarding the unaffordable cost of homes.
At the same time, it's "your fault" if you're priced out of housing and have to go live on the street.
I'm happy that I'm on a path that will allow me to buy a plot of land in full with no debt and eventually live on it, assuming nothing disrupts my plans. Being able to set aside 5-figures a year is more than most people could ever dream of today, even if in the grand scheme of what that will be able to purchase, it is still modest. For years I'd been making plans to become homeless long-term, but I might not have to think about that anymore.
I really badly want a plot of land to live on and get a permaculture setup going. I'm used to living cheap, and want to keep any and all bills preferably non-existent, or at least to a bare minimum. I'll have solar panels and DIY windmills for electricity, home-built electric vehicles to get around in powered by said electricity, and a well dug to pump water from. It is the only way I can foresee myself ever being able to start a family or have a retirement with my current rate of pay and with my personal experience regarding employment stability. I'm not at all confident I will have stable employment for the duration of time it would take for me to pay a mortgage, and my coworkers who went that route are screwed if anything unanticipated occurs to disrupt their finances.
Being debt-free sure makes financial planning a lot easier and opens up opportunities that wouldn't exist otherwise.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson