by evilgenius » Sat 27 Mar 2021, 09:46:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cantonn11', 'I') have an understanding that many recessions are caused by energy price spikes or energy shortages. In the Great Recession/GFC of 2008, the root cause of that crisis was the shortfall in energy supply (particularly oil) to demand which resulted in a huge price spike resulting in a significant increase in energy prices.
No it wasn't. You're on the internet, you can look it up and check what all sorts of very credible economic experts / sources say on that. The 2008 great recession was CLEARLY primarily a real estate disaster causing a big capital dislocation and crisis of confidence in the banking and then the entire financial system. (Facts and expertise are both "things").
No doubt the high energy, especially oil, prices didn't do any GOOD. They were certainly a big inconvenience for many, but they were NOT shutting down the US or global economy at the peak in July of 2008, even though they were causing some people to park their gas guzzlers and drive econoboxes to work to save money on the daily commute. (There were people like that I discussed the issue with as neighbors in my apartment complex, for example). But that was only a secondary issue, and a far distant one compared to the primary one of real estate and financial dislocation from that.
I like the way your argument has developed. You can acknowledge what certain people went through when you make your argument now. I agree that, overall, the reason for 2008 was that too many people reneged on their debts. That caused an immediate collapse of the money supply.
An expanded money supply was necessary for various groups, such as independent contractors in construction, to function. They made a profit because of the weird way that the US understands the role of oil in its economy. The US does not have European style high taxes upon petroleum products.
For those in those sectors of the economy where low gas prices were like a government subsidy, high gas prices were a death knell. Because it is an economy that we are talking about, people had different reasons for going under. Their individual reasons weren't made invalid by the overall reason being more influential across more groups of people in their own situations.
I used to argue with you over this, before I understood I ought to acknowledge how right you are. I used to cling to seeing the thing that happened that way because I viewed it from that sort of situation myself. But my own thing, delivery driving, was merely a piece of the puzzle. My own group, those who took advantage of the ordinary situation with gas prices within the US economy, failing would not have brought the whole thing down.
The worst thing that it did was to restrict the number of contractors in the building trades who could have competed for work. If it had occurred alone it may have acted differently within the economy but, there was not an oversupply of construction workers driving wages down enough to allow builders to adjust for what was happening. The high gas prices made sure of that, at the wrong time. Those construction workers for whom simply driving the F-350 around would have been cost prohibitive were not included in the conversation. There were a lot of them, but not so many as to economically drive the situation.
No amount of worker over supply could have changed what was in store. At that point in time, I think construction work could have paid $5 an hour at beyond peak employment and it still wouldn't have mattered. It wasn't any deal with wages that would fix this. People were levered for multiple years worth of even good wages. Low cost make work wasn't going to fix that, not even at scale. You are so right, the shrinkage of the money supply was not something we could overcome so easily.