by Outcast_Searcher » Thu 13 May 2021, 13:11:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')Yes a pipeline is a perfect candidate for such a solution. I am assuming they have a access to dedicated fibers, not unlikely because they own the ROW and sell access to fiber companies.
Here is how it works. You have hour own fiber so you transmit your data via using a Time Domain technology: a T-1 line and if fancy over SONET. These circuits are very analogous to a copper pair, they travel from point A to B. They can be rerouted but not in the sense that a ethernet data stream is. The data all physically stays on your own fiber cable.
Yes. I know little about the physics, software, and specific standards behind networking, just being a network user. But re T1 lines as an old and solid alternative solution, that's a great example.
I know damn well that in the IBM mainframe business for DECADES before the internet became much of a thing, that for individual applications needing serious communication bandwidth, we could order T-1 lines and have them installed while an application was being developed. Then they could be tested as the application was tested and in my experience as a user of the T-1 line, they simply always worked. The only issue was it was FAR from free -- there were serious monthly service payments required throughout the lifetime of the use of the T-1 line, and I presume that a minimum service period was required (I didn't handle the accounting end at all). Generally the customer was so very happy to have a viable, FAST, reliable, secure solution at a "reasonable" cost, that they just said "no problem" when the cost was pointed out. (Time is money, and having a private T1 lime could multiply data bandwidth MANYfold. When reliability was paramount, they'd say, "I'll take two at twice the cost". That way when one line was down, they still had half the bandwidth with the other line, and their application kept on trucking.)
Then as security became more of a thing, serious security standards were developed so serious IBM security software like RACF could be easily used to provide a standardized and fully supported way to automatically encrypt / decrypt ALL the data that travelled over the T-1 line. So it was secure AND kept the hell away from easy access via the internet, once the internet became a common thing.
It's not that IN ANY WAY these things "can't be done" without the internet. It's that it costs more, takes serious planning ahead and minimal cost commitment, etc.
And of course, this is all BEYOND backing up one's important data, since physical device failures, software problems, inside jobs re planting malware like trojan horses, viruses, etc. is a threat, etc. -- so keeping additional copies safe and AWAY from the active systems should STILL be very much "a thing" for any serious business which critical reliance on their data to function.
...
It would be nice to live in a world where everything could be a turnkey operation and would always work fine. All problems solved. We live in a world VERY far from that, despite the fact that we no longer find sabre toothed tigers in our cave on occasion. Different times, different types of risks.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.