by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 25 Oct 2020, 11:57:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'W')hile I await Carinkes response I will demonstrate my ignorance by attempting a partial answer.
...
Because they are rare their quantity is controlled. My understanding is that super computers or mesh computing is being used to solve for more bitcoin solutions. The energy being expended to “mine” bitcoins is somewhat more than what Belgium uses.
Essentially you own a bit coin solution, you get a certification of the solution, which is unique, can not be replicated.
So a bit coin is a lot like gold, it is a rare item, limited quantity, can not be replicated or transmuted.
It is a rejection of fiat currencies the same way gold bugs hoard physical gold. Or junk silver. I think of it this way, a bit coin is real in the intellectual world the way hold is real in the physical world. It is a repudiation of fiat which is based on TRUST. So gold bugs and bit coin adherents are saying they have more faith in good or the bit coin SYSTEM than they do in dollars. Then there are the folks who buy toilet paper and ammo.
Good high level (nontechnical) answer, IMO. For those who want "serious" technical answers, there are books, and there are white papers on the internet.
I'm NO expert, but have done a bit of reading and thinking about the technology. So I'm speaking conceptually here, strictly as a layman.
Like with gold, there are problems, re security and expenses with something like Bitcoin. Some more modern cryptos overcome some of the issues/limitations (like transaction speed), but not all.
So for example, for Bitcoin specifically, it's relatively slow and expensive to do a transaction, given how much background work has to go on in the distributed public ledger that is core to Bitcoin, get the transaction verified and approved, etc. So compared to that, modern chipped credit cards are a MUCH more efficient and inexpensive solution.
Then you have all the blatant hacking that has gone on for people using Bitcoin repositories. And unlike dollars in banks, secured by FDIC insurance, lots of such Bitcoin thefts are partially just lost to Bitcoin holders, in LARGE percentages.
(And this is like the problem with physical gold or paper currency. Subject to theft, requires secure storage, and expensive and a hassle to manage due to that). Electronic storage of paper currency doesn't have that problem IF you trust the government / banking system -- and of course, trust (or lack thereof) is earned.)
Bitcoin Wallets are supposedly secure against such hacking, but almost no one really understands the tech. and whether there might be back doors, flaws like bugs, or other issues. No one is sure who even invented Bitcoin. One concern I'd have is whether some day, the inventor uses a back door, greatly enriches him/herself, and then the whole Bitcoin structure goes POOF re credibility and having any worth. Same could apply to any other cryptocurrency, including government sponsored ones.
And let's say one chooses Bitcoin, despite its flaws. Or cryptocurrency X despite its flaws. WHAT HAPPENS if at some point, government(s) suddenly announce a new government sponsored/mandated cryptocurrency that just blows the market value of Bitcoin, etc. out of the water? If the government would BACK the value of its cryptocurrency if it's hacked or stolen, and it is highly efficient and cheap to transact, like a Visa transaction -- I think the value of something like Bitcoin would decline (over time) by 90%, and perhaps 99% or even 100%.
One theory is crypto would let people evade income taxes. That dream is already dead, re IRS regulations and tools. People get 1099's for Bitcoin trading, for example. They (TPTB like the IRS) have some ability to track transactions from analyzing the public ledger for another.
...
To me, cryptocurrencies are a clever idea that don't pass far too many practicality / risk tests to make me want to buy them. OTOH, the underlying technology of the blockchain (the tech. behind the structure of the data in the public ledger used for cryptocurrencies) might well end up being a powerful tool for record keeping for things like financial transactions, which is why there is a serious amount of R&D occurring on that business opportunity by various software outfits.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.