by dissident » Mon 19 Oct 2020, 11:33:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'V')ery recently i had 2 interactions with well educated college grads.
One had never heard of Winston Churchill. Total blank. How the hell do you not at least recognize the name?
Second was a 35-40ish male. PhD. He had never heard if the Selective Service Commission. He is about the same age as one of my sons, who was required to register. So this guy was legally bound to register also. Men of MY age damn well know about the SSC. But also it shows how far removed from war, from USA aggression this guy is. Just does not dawn on him that someone might have thrown him personally into battle. Nor that his kids could he drafted.
This is a new type of segregation. Class segregation. The warriors vs the nerds. Not good.
I Think it helps explain why the Ds have become the war hawks.
People 40 years ago were still in a mental framework influenced by generations of the 40 years before who had sufficient external stimulus to develop mental skills to survive. People born in the late 1980s and around the year 2000 are vastly less capable because everything has been given to them on a platter. They are spoiled prats and who think they are entitled to everything without having to earn it. We are living in the early stages of an idiocracy where the masses have not had the right sort of environment to grow their brains and personalities.
We may be seeing the answer to Fermi's paradox. The reason we see no super advanced utopias in the observable universe may be because any development reaches a point where the intelligent life forms do not have to try. Sort of like the atrophy of muscles seen in people who spend prolonged periods in orbit. Without an "adverse" environment biological tissues including brains degenerate to an inferior equilibrium with whatever marginal adversity there is. There is no stability plateau retaining previous achievements (again, we see this in athletes who have to train all the time no matter how good they get) and instead a collapse.
Of course, in society there is a distribution of people and this degeneration process is not monochromatic. There are still people who do try and who develop intellectually. But the Gaussian is shifting to lower "IQ". This is very bad for the functionality of society. I do not think that the shrinking minority of functional people will form some new elite since that is not so easy, but regardless the advanced technical state of easy living is what is driving the degeneration and would have to go if the process were to be stopped. However, I do not see how a transition to a more primitive state would occur without breakdown of society. Any reset will be likely be very painful. But that is a common pattern of overshoot-undershoot. Easy living will lead to collapse followed by very hard times.