Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil From The Farm

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Peak Oil From The Farm

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 16:48:37

Good day to all:

I am brand new to this board. Right now I live with a very high level of frustration. My husband and I are cattle farmers in mid Missouri. I view peak oil from an agriculture view point. I also view peak oil as it is being played out in small town midwest America. The picture is not a pretty one. I am hoping that I may add my insights to this board from where I see it. Please let me know if I am posting this on the wrong forum.

In this post I will just start with two aspects of peak oil that really frighten me:

First, I have attempted to start discussion groups, show films, etc. I have been shot down at every turn. Even our local public library has refused to allow me to show the film "End of Suburbia". At first I thought the negative response was just that people thought I was a left wing nutcase. Slowly, and eerily, it has evolved that people already know what is happening. People do not know consciously, they know it deep down inside. They want to keep this information hidden. I would call this a form of social cognitive dissonance. Tell me if I am off base here. From what I am picking up in the Midwest, there are basically just two groups of people; those that just don't understand this, and those that do, but don't want to. My level of frustration drove me to this board.

Second, my husband and I own 160 acres, and raise cattle with what is known as a cow/calf operation. Our 160 acres is entirely in pasture/woods. We raised crops, but had to stop in 1990 because of soil depletion. This is a common history for Missouri farms. The average size of a small Missouri farm is 160 acres. About 30 head of cows (breeding females) can be raised on this acreage. With mamas and offspring, bulls and steers, (meat animals) the head count usually runs about 60-75 animals.

Most people think that the backbone of farming is the gigantic conglomerate farms. A person doesn't have to do a lot of math to see that these farms will collapse first with the decline of natural resources. Most people think that the population can then fall back on the "small farm". Well, we are that small farm, and I can tell you right now, that it just won't work. For instance. 10 years ago we paid 26 cents a pound for synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which is made from natural gas (another depleting resource). This year we paid 40 cents a pound. We could only afford to fertilize about 60 acres of land, at a cost of about 2,000.00 dollars. Without synthetic fertilizers to create nutritious grass, our head count on the farm would drop drastically. Carrying capacity on almost all farm land in the United States is artifically maintained by synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. Most people think of crops, combines, and large petroleum inputs, when they think of agriculture and oil depletion, but the picture is much broader.

My husband and I do our utmost to farm in a manner that preserves the farm while maintaining our carrying capacity for our cattle. We use huge amounts of ground water to water our cattle, and a lot of petroleum to put up hay for them to consume in the winter. We fertilize with synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. We cut the hay with a large International Harvester tractor. We rake the hay with a tractor, bale the hay with a tractor and a big baler. Then we use the same tractor to put the hay in the barn. We then use the same tractor to haul the hay out of the barn in the winter to feed it to the cattle. We use the pick-up truck and trailer to haul the cattle to the sale barn, or the slaughterhouse. We have ponds to water naturally, but their use is limited. Most of our watering is done with watering systems that utilize water that we pay for. We are part of a water co-op. We are using underground well water to water our cattle. We fence our cattle with electric fence. We use what is known as an intensive grazing management system. We move the cattle to new pasture every 3 or 4 days. This method prevents overgrazing and drastically reduces erosion, but we have a lot of fence, almost all of it electric.

Our farm is considered small, and we utilize a lot of energy saving practices. We have quail habitats, and many wild places that we keep fenced from cattle to prevent habitat destruction. Nonetheless, I do not know how we could continue our operation without our present use of petroleum. We raise a large garden, and have peaches, apples, strawberries and blackberries. We use no petroleum based insecticides of any kind. My husband ceased using herbicides years ago.
Now, that might sound like we use a lot of petroleum, but actually, we use less than most farming operations.

When we put up our big bales of hay, they are composed of grass that has just been allowed to sit and dry for a couple of days. You can't bale wet hay. The hay will mold and be ruined. The exception to this is a product called haylage. Haylage is similar to silage. Silage is fermented corn. Haylage is fermented hay. The standard way to achieve fermentation is to remove oxygen from the product. In farming, you do this with a silo. Modern silos are the large blue towers that you see on some farms. The blue silos are called harvestores. They work beautifully, are very airtight, and create wonderful haylage and silage. Cattle love haylage. it smells kind of like beer, and the fermentation process increases nutrition content and digestability. The problem with this system, and the link to petroleum depletion is that harvestores are very expensive. They start at about 80 thousand dollars. Farmers are now utilizing an inexpensive method to imitate the fermentation of harvestores. They are using a large machine that runs on petroleum to wrap the bales in plastic wrap made of petroleum. In all of my years in farming I have never seen such a stupid wasteful practice. The waste percentage is huge. So many bales do not ferment. Rips in the plastic, along with waste on the end bales of the wrapped rows make this a wasteful procedure. The plastic is not reused. We had neighbors who were doing this with thousands of bales per year. they were burning the plastic. I guess somebody reported them to the EPA because they have not burned any plastic in two years. I do not know what they do with the plastic now. More and more farmers are switching to this method of roughage production for cattle. The process is wasteful, expensive, and extremely energy and labor intensive. The world has gone crazy.

Sorry this is so long.

Phebagirl {pargraph editing by MQ} :)
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Unread postby RockHind » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:09:55

Thanks for the insight into the workings of a small farm.

Does running the farm in this manner create enought income to pay for the land and all your expenses plus a little savings for retirement or do you and your husband have to work other jobs to make ends meet?

How many cattle could the land support with out the fertiliser additions?


Lastly how have profit margins changed in the last five years?

thanks
User avatar
RockHind
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat 19 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: S Florida

Unread postby Pops » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:11:11

Thanks for the post phebagirl and welcome. We really need insight from folks like you.

There aren’t many commercial farmers here aside from pip that raises wheat in Texas and Colorado Valley who I think also has a cow calf outfit and you can guess where.

We just moved last year to a little place in Lawrence county and though I don’t know many people the ones I have met – farmers to one extent or another, nod when I say something about discovery vs. extraction but I’m not sure they could see a way out any more than you or a commuter that can’t afford the commute but can’t afford not to commute.

They see themselves as far more practical than the Amish around here and to give up round bales and go back to little squares worked by hand (just for an example) just ain’t an option.

In the long run I think people will be required to pay more for food or cut way down on what types they eat, in the short run however that means lots of farm families will go out of business – I hope it’s not you.

Have you looked into direct selling? Grass fed, no nasty chemicals and all that.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby Eli » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:13:45

Great first post.

I think your first hand experiences will be a great addition to the site.

Phebagirl I think you are right as well that people know what is happening they just do not want to talk about it. They know something bad is coming but choose not to acknowledge it consciously.

You have land and you may have to just focus on survival in the future. Cheap energy means increased production with less man power. In the future man power will be in abundance.

Remember too that as PO continues to hit your place is going to sound like heaven to 99% of the earth's population. Even if you are faced with many troubles and tribulations.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Unread postby RonMN » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:32:02

Welcome Phebagirl. I agree that many people know something is up but just don't want their vision of the world to be shattered.

I wanted to suggest that since you can't afford to keep using chemical fertalizer...maybe you could start trying to revitalize the soil in areas you didn't fertalize this year & mark them off as to never use chem-fertalizer in this area again. Maybe grow alphalfa & just turn it into the soil (don't harvest it)...or turn in leaves/wood chips that alot of places (cities) would give you for free. I'm sure there are other methods as well.

as the fertalizer get's more & more expensive you'll need some acres to be productive! But you don't have to do it all in one season.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby T4chibanaUkyo » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:38:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', ' ')Remember too that as PO continues to hit your place is going to sound like heaven to 99% of the earth's population. Even if you are faced with many troubles and tribulations.


I concur with what Eli says, I can sense the trouble and all I want to do is forget about my career, and give my allegiance to a farmer so that we may together prepare for what is to come. (hmm, giving allegiance....kinda sounds like warriors for hire, hey, could this is the era where the pesant farmer will become king/queen to a whole fleet of people willing to give their allegiance for food? Way to go!)
User avatar
T4chibanaUkyo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby gego » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 17:44:53

And people believe there will not be a dieoff without oil!

It should be obvious what will happen. This cattle operation just described may go on but with maybe 1/3 of the cattle now carried because the pasture will be poorer and the hay yeild will be down, and because they may need to change to horse drawn hay rakes, bailers, and manure spreaders, which means that they must also feed the horse.

Some of these operations will not go on, because of debt on the place and the inability to fund the debt with lower yeilds.

Even if they can get gas for a tractor and nitrogen fertilizer, how long will they afford that at scarcity prices?
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Pops » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 18:02:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'A')nd people believe there will not be a dieoff without oil!


A die-off of Mickey D’s and family farms maybe – Americans only eat 38# of beef a year but they really like their hamburger!

Beef
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby pip » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 18:59:36

Phebagirl, glad you're here and welcome.

I'm running some cows here in TX panhandle in addition to my "real" job. I don't use fertilizer, I just keep the stocking rate down to what the land can handle. I've got 160 acres of native buffalo grass that will support 1 cow per 15-20 acres. I also have another 160 acres of improved bluestem pasture that will support 1 cow/8 acres. Land is much cheaper here so the economics work at this stocking level. The grass is staying in good shape even during this dry summer so I believe this is somewhat sustainable.

I don't know how peak will affect the small farms. As you described, ag production should drop off considerably. It's my hope that commodity prices will rise sufficiently due to basic supply and demand to allow us to continue to make a profit. It's anybodys guess.
The road goes on forever and the party never ends - REK
User avatar
pip
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed 21 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Republic of Texas

Unread postby killJOY » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 19:01:11

What a fascinating and well-written intro!

My partner and I have a subsistence farm in New England. We just got a milk cow and are VERY pleased with the results. We plan to raise a beef critter, too, and feed it hay we cut ourselves and store loose in the barn.

We are not large enough to produce commercially. We only have about 15 acres of pasture and hayfields. The balance of our hay comes from neighbors' fields. I'm horrified at the encroaching development and fear we may lose our haying privileges.

Our fields our fertilized entirely with manure via a John Deere spreader. We're planning on adding the short fiber waste from paper plants, which is available free through New England Organics.

With our orchard, chickens, turkeys and cow, we are able to grow much of our own food, plus sell surplus to friends for pocket money. Once the cows are producing well, we plan to (silently) sell raw milk from grass-fed cows, some of the healthiest food available.


One thing I'd like you to comment on if you would:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have been shot down at every turn.
Could you explain this a little more? What have you done, and what exactly have people said?

Here, we are in touch with a small group that are very receptive to peak oil news. In fact, this Monday we're showing "Suburbia" to a group of friends here at the farm.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Unread postby Pops » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 19:52:52

One thing I might also suggest is www.meetup.com. Look for the PO groups, they are few down this way but I think KC, Jeff City and St Louis would have bigger groups.

Like this site they may be more urban than rural but it could be worth a try to get together.

BTW, what do you hear from the state? One of the reasons we liked MO is that it seems very small farmer friendly. Any word from them?


See, I told you that we need your input here!
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby bart » Fri 29 Jul 2005, 20:13:03

We need "Small Farmer Fan Clubs" to support and applaud you folks who are trying to make a go of it.

Come Peak Oil, we will need your expertise and your products.

YOU will be the heroes of the future, not the movie stars and industry tycoons of today.

As for people who don't want to hear the Peak Oil message, there's no point in pushing it. Make your preparations, be willing to talk if people are curious, have a good life. In time, the others will come around. It's like any new idea.

Best of luck and welcome to the board, Phebagirl!
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif

Unread postby Ghog » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 01:31:26

Welcome!! [smilie=wav.gif]

For one thing, don't let it get you down. You will find most don't want to believe it, even if they know deep down it's true. It is the nature of our modern way. If it means a disruption in my 'keeping up with the Jones' lifestyle, I'm not interested.

Second, I am curious on your opinion of sustainable farming as it pertains to natural gardening/mini-farming. Biointensive techniques. Using less water and fertilizer, less land, higher outputs, etc. while replenishing the soil naturally. Are you familiar?

Anyway, nice to have you aboard. It's a great place to learn (and educate) and support each other for the tough times ahead.
User avatar
Ghog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 03:27:41

Oh, this is the right forum, gal! I must say, your first post is one of the best posts this site has seen. A first hand view of the consequences of hydrocarbon depletion from the frontlines--and a well written account!

I have 212 acres in Northwest Missouri near the Iowa border that we rent to a neighbor. I can totally relate to all your words.

Welcome to peakoil.com! :-D
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

More Peak Oil From the Farm

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 15:10:02

Good day:

I talked to my husband this morning about what I posted yesterday. He had some fascinating facts for me to add. But first, some answers to some questions.

I do not know of a single farmer who makes a living from a 160 acre farm. Either with crop farming or a cow/calf operation. In the last 20 years our taxes have only shown a profit 2 or 3 times. My husband raises the cattle because he loves them. We both love living in the country, and the cattle help to justify living here. My husband bought this farm when he was just 19 years old. (52 now) He bought his first cow when he was just a kid. His father was born and raised here. We make about 8 to 10 thousand dollars a year from cattle. That's gross!

Fertilizer runs about two grand, shots and vet care run another thousand (if you get lucky). Then there is the cost of hay production, etc. My husband is a full-time union carpenter. I am a stay at home farm wife. There are not many good jobs in the area. Any decent job is in Columbia, Missouri, which is 26 miles away. I have rheumatoid arthritis which limits my ability to work full time. I get in enough mischief just staying home and doing volunteer work. I will disucss my volunteer work and the connection of small town America to peak oil in another post.

My husband told me this morning that he is trying to wean us away from using so much synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. Back in 1990 he stopped crop farming. The farm had been in constant production since the 1970's. In 1991 he put in 22 acres of a native Missouri grass called Gamma grass. gamma grass is a dicot like corn. Unlike corn, gamma grass is native to Missouri and grows well here. Also, unlike corn, gamma grass is a perennial. During the worst summer heat, when other grasses wilt, Gamma grass is available for cattle. Also, we do not bale the gamma grass, and do controlled burn in February to control weeds. No chemicals!. By not baling the grass, which grows up to 6 ft. tall, we also provide nesting ground for a lot of species. Unfortunately, most native grasses in Missouri have been pushed out to make way for a grass called K31 (or Kentucky31) Fescue. This grass was introduced several decades ago, and has taken over the state. the good points about fescue are that it is very sturdy. You can't kill it! The cattle eat it. Fescue helps stop erosion. Fescue has an extensive root system.

The downside to fescue is an endophyte fungus that invades the plant. The fungus is hard on cattle. Their milk production drops, and they develop foot infections. The fescue fungus also causes thickening of the placenta that can cause birthing problems. The thickening of the placenta is especially bad with horses that are kept on fescue.. Fescue and gamma are both grasses. Clover, Lespedeza, alfalfa are legumes. legumes actually fix or add nitrogen back into the soil. The problem is that fescue smothers the legume plants. Fescue is impossible to kill. ** Legumes self seed every year, and are not true perennials. Farmers must reseed the legumes every few years.

My husband found that by cutting back on the nitrogen fertilizer, he was not feeding the fescue. The legumes grow better, and self seed better.
We get less hay, but the hay is of a better quality. Less hay means lower carrying capacity. Gamma grass does need some nitrogen fertilizer to sustain our carrying capacity.

One more item that links our farm to natural gas and petroleum is what is called synthetic urea protein supplement. Keeping mama cows on grass is the common practice for raising beef cattle in a cow/calf operation. Unfortunately most green grasses do not have enough protein to sustain superior health. The legumes are much higher in protein than the grasses, but you still need to supplement when mothers are raising babies. The supplement is a liquid containing synthetic urea (made with natural gas!!) and molasses. The molasses is grown in Mexico using petroleum based agriculture, and trucked here with petroleum. We just ordered a ton of the supplement. by the way, the cattle consume the liquid from a "lick tank". The lick tank is made of plastic (petroleum). There is also salt added to force the cow to limit consumption. Each cow consumes about 24 cents per day, or about 1-2 pounds of supplement. At 250.00 a ton, that is quite expensive. What will supplenent cost when the price of natural gas and petroleum go up?

My husband said that when he was a young boy they farmed with horse drawn style equipment using just on old tractor. They hay was not baled but was piled in the large piles that you see on Amish farms. This system of agriculture is labor intensive, but everybody pitched in and helped. My Mother in law said that she remembers cooking huge meals for neighbors who helped during haying season.

My husband said that if the petroleum went up to 5.00 a gallon tomorrow he would have to sell 1/3 of our herd unless the beef market rose in accordance with the petroleum prices. Right now we sell hamburger for 2.00 a pound. When it cost 6.50 a pound I am wondering who will be able to afford it. I know other folks had more questions from my previous post. I need to go back and reread it and get back with more answers later.

By the way, we have had a very bad drought here in Missouri. As I type this my husband is outside on the tractor baling more hay. He believes that we are in for a very rough season. Hay baled this time of year is very low in nutritive value and is mostly filler. That means a lot more of the natural gas based synthetic urea supplement. Because of the drought our corn in this area is a goner.

A neighbor walked out into the middle of a corn field about a mile behind us. He pulled two nine inch ears of corn off the plant and counted the kernels of corn. One had two, the other 12. Sure couldn't make much ethanol with that!! The rules and laws of nature!

More later,

Phebagirl

** Fescue is so hard to kill that my husband was forced to apply a nasty (think Dioxin!) herbicide to the 22 acres before he could plant the warm season grass. That is the last time a petroleum based chemical was applied to the farm. (1991) {paragraph editing by MQ} :)
Even going natural is not as easy as some books make it seem.
Plowing fescue under does not kill it.
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Peak oil From the Farm

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 16:04:11

Okay, I just finished posting my husband's answers to some questions. Now I will attempt to answer a few.

"Shot Down At Every Turn". What a nightmare it has been. My husband and I attend a Democratic club. I believe it is Howard Dean's old group. We just enjoy the company of the folks. I invited them all to my home to see "End of Suburbia", and cooked a big meal. (bribery). I was hoping to gain support to help spread the showing of the film, and increase awareness of peak oil. The head of the group went ballistic over the film. He said that I was promoting nuclear energy by showing the film. So, I went and did a ton of research on the film. I learned who sponsored it; Postcarbon.org. I learned about the leader of that group; Julian Darley. I learned that Julian Darley is vehemently anti-nuclear. I returned to the club with this information. Then the leader learned that Matthew Simmons once worked for Dick Cheney. that ended that. The sad part is that we may have to rely on nuclear energy for a while. That doesn't mean you throw the baby out with the bathwater. I was frustrated that my fellow Democrats would take such a narrow view to the film just because Matthew Simmons was involved. As far as I am concerned, if Matthew Simmons says that we are in trouble, then we are in trouble.

Last fall I took the film to my local library in Fulton, Missouri. I asked if the film could be put on their calendar of events. they just kept blowing me off. they asked me to find a counterpoint film. I could not find a counterpoint film, but I did find several authors who have published papers that disagree with the film. I never received a reply. So, I took the film to the larger library in Columbia, Missouri. (A university town.) In December, the events coordinator told me that she might be able to squeeze the film in by February, then she said March, then April. Finally, I physically took the film to her for her to view privately. She took one look at the cover and the title, and said that she didn't have time, and would need to keep the film for at least a month. Then she offhandedly said that she could possibly get the film on the calendar some time in 2006. I gave up.

I recently ordered the'End of Suburbia" community action pack. I plan on selling the five copies that are full jackets, and will use the rest to just spread the word as much as I can. My frustration just makes me want to slap somebody.

I do volunteer work at the food bank in a small town here in Mid-Mo. One person who came for food started talking out the oil situation. This person said that when Bush was no longer president all of our oil problems would be cured. (I am not making this up). The person said that Bush owned most of the oil wells in Texas, and he could not pump them while he was president. it was a conflict of interest. As soon as he left office, he could start pumping oil again and everything would get better. This doofus made Bush, who is a doofus, into a hero by default. By the way, I have learned not to voice my opinion in such conversations. I learn a lot more by nodding my head, being nice, and asking lots of question. People love to answer questions posed in such a manner.

SUSTAINABLE FARMING: Please listen to the following sentence carefully. With sustainable farming, a huge percentage of mankind will die of starvation!!. Productivity will drop by about 75 to 90 percent. Bushels per acre will fall to nothing. You would even have a difficult time feeding yourself. I raise an organic vegetable garden. I can't raise enough food to feed my husband and I. I do use less water. I use a lot of mulch. I bottom water, etc. This year it did not matter. The drought was the worst since 1980. My garden is a lost cause. I do not understand what you mean by naturally replenishing. Please elaborate.
Our profit margin over the last 5 years is laughable. As I said in the former post, we really do not make what you could call a profit from the cow/calf operation. The cattle pay for themselves. That's about it. Some years we make enough to buy a newer piece of equipment, or do an upgrade. Most farm money goes back into farming. Housekeeping comes from his off farm job. The farm is paid for. If the farm were not paid for, and we could not utilize a peteroleum based agriculture sytem, we would lose the farm. As it is, there may come a day when we can't even afford taxes ($1,800.00 per year. Comes out of gross profit) Do the math!

SMALL FARM FRIENDLY!! Depends on who you talk to and where you are talking about. Southern Missouri, The Ozarks is not good farm country. Most of that country consists of a few inches of topsoil over bare rock. Hills and gullies might look beautiful in a car, but you can't do much farming in "them thar hills". The Northern portion of Missouri is mostly prairie. There is not a lot there to sustain a small farm. Mid-Missouri is your best shot, but land is higher. Most small farms in Missouri are on depleted soil or they are in CRP programs. To make a true living on a Missouri farm it usually takes about 1200 acres.

We do raise grass fed cows. Most cows are grass fed. Grass alone can not sustain a cow/calf operation. Right now we are in a drought situation. Our cows have no grass. There are years when it is necessary to start feeding hay in July. You must have supplements to keep healthy herds. Also, people do not want beef from grass fed animals. People want beef that they can cut with a fork, and that is corn fed beef.

Okay, this is a bit off base here, but I need to get this out. Angus beef is a joke!. Angus is a breed of animal. The animals happen to have black hide. That is the only thing that makes Angus beef different than any other kind of beef. There are just three things that make beef taste good:

The first is what gets fed to the beef. Corn fed beef creates marbling (fat) in the meat and makes it tender.

The 2nd is the sex of the animal. Steers (neutered bulls) make the most tender beef. Bull meat on the other hand is very lean. Bull meat is healthier, but not as tender. (We raise bull meat for our own consumption) To get a steer to eat corn you have to confine it. These animals are not so stupid. they prefer eating grass! Grass fed beef can be raised, but not quickly enough to satisfy a beef hungry nation. it takes twice the amount of time to raise grass fed beef, versus corn fed.

Third, and most peole just don't want to hear this. The tenderness of the beef is determined by how long you leave it hang after the animal has died. The meat needs to age. Assembly line beef producing facilities lose money when they leave beef hang. Two weeks should be the minimum, but that rarely happens any more. rigor mortis sets in when the animal dies and that needs time to dissolve. What pretty much happens, is that the beginning of the decay process needs to set in for the meat to tender up. You know that turkey vulture that patiently waits for that dead possum on the road to stinky up a bit; he's not stupid.

For the gentleman who said he takes hay from his neighbors field. I am curious as to how the hay in the neighbor's field is processed. So far it seems like our petroleum based operation is basically robbing peter to pay paul. When we reduce nitrogen fertilizer we need to rely more heavily on synthetic urea made from natural gas. It's a no win situation.

Chat later

Phebagirl
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Unread postby Ghog » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 16:27:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')USTAINABLE FARMING: Please listen to the following sentence carefully. With sustainable farming, a huge percentage of mankind will die of starvation!!. Productivity will drop by about 75 to 90 percent. Bushels per acre will fall to nothing. You would even have a difficult time feeding yourself. I raise an organic vegetable garden. I can't raise enough food to feed my husband and I. I do use less water. I use a lot of mulch. I bottom water, etc. This year it did not matter. The drought was the worst since 1980. My garden is a lost cause. I do not understand what you mean by naturally replenishing. Please elaborate


This was my question. By no means am I questioning your knowledge, but are you familiar with Biointensive techniques? As opposed to getting into a detailed explanation, it might be best for you to read about it (if you are not familiar). Ecology Action http://www.growbiointensive.org/ have performed extensive studies on these techniques especially in regards to the above bold quote. It is really a more mini-farming/gardening technique than for large-scale agriculture, but I am curious of your thoughts. Many of the problems you speak of are most vital to Biointensive farming, but their ideas must be done in concert with each other. (Close spacing- a mini-climate, raised beds, double-digging, etc). There is alot to read, but with your experience I'm sure you can work through it quickly. Thank you in advance for offering your insite and opinion on an important subject. :)
User avatar
Ghog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania

Unread postby Pops » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 18:43:17

Whoa Girl! Put an extra paragraph return in there somewhere! It reads like you drank way too much coffee! {I've been helping her with this MQ} :)

As to the fescue, we aren’t seeing any endophyte so far here; it’s been real dry, but I would like to get a little warm season grass on a couple of plots – especially after this, our first year and very dry. Today I put out hay for the first time.

BTW, we only have 40ac, about 25 fescue, we have only 10 steers now but are going (it seems) toward backgrounding dairy heifers; 3 in hutches and 3 more on the way (in trade for bull calves so make that 12 total).

I contemplated fertilizing our 20 (the hay field / pasture) but decided I would rather frost seed more clover this winter.

Oh and don’t sell the south short, Lawrence has a pretty low stocking rate – under 4 (due to lots of chicken farms), 2nd or 3rd in total beef population, pretty well up there on dairy cows and I think the 1st or second in hay production – I think that’s in here: http://www.houstonherald.com/beef%20report.pdf

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Phebagirl', '
')
SMALL FARM FRIENDLY!! To make a true living on a Missouri farm it usually takes about 1200 acres.


I guess it depends on what you mean by ‘true living’. If it means living like the folks in town that don’t need to do chores and can watch cable when they get home from their 8 hours, then you are probably right. If true living means not being tethered to the pump hose, the bosses schedule and what you see on the tube, then I’m not sure I agree.

No offense :) .
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Peak Oil From the Farm

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 21:18:35

Good evening:

First, I am so sorry for rambling on with the previous letter. I just got on a roll. And, I don't even drink coffee.

It’s ironic that you should mention biointensive. My husband and I are planning on attending a class on raised bed biointensive as soon as we get the time to drive to southern Missouri. I guess when I speak of a failure of small farming, I am speaking of the ability to feed massive numbers of people. With a small biointensive farm my husband and I could probably feed ourselves, our kids, and grandkids. Beyond that, I am wary.

Raised bed gardening has downsides; the worst being drainage of water. Double digging is labor intensive. But, then from what I have read, we are heading into a period of history where almost everybody will be involved in labor intensive activity. I have no doubt that we will survive on our farm. I find it highly doubtful that any method of farming will be able to feed 6 billion people. That is my concern.

When I speak of living wage I speak of what most people expect when they think of a living wage. Most people do not have a clue how little a person really needs to survive and be happy. You are so correct. I know people that make less than a thousand dollars a month, and they are happy. We are certainly not wealthy. With me not able to work outside of the home, we have to watch our pennies. For instance, our home has no air conditioning. We get by. We waste nothing. All of my clothing is purchased 2nd hand. I can hunt out a bargain a mile away. I sew, and cook, and can. I made all of our curtains and drapes, and I reupholstered our sofa two years ago. I hang out all of our laundry. We both work very hard to minimize expense, and to save energy.

When the weather turned off cool last week we were in heaven. People who spend all of their time away from nature do not appreciate such joy. They miss the bliss, so to speak. For the majority of the population, living in the country is like being in an episode of Little House on the Prairie. What most people do not realize is that the Little House family suffered great hardship that is not apparent on the show. Both Laura and Mary were stunted. Laura escaped being a dwarf by a mere inch. Malnutrition and disease were common.

Any time you feed people you are at the whims of nature. We have escaped being controlled by nature by sheer volume of production. We were able to do so because of cheap oil. the cheap oil is about to end, and once again we will be at the mercy of the whims of nature. Because of the drought my entire garden is lost. The potatoes are tiny and shriveled. I have not dug the sweet potatoes yet. we watered them, but since we are on a co-op it cost money to water. Besides, water made little difference. Soil temperature reached over 111 degrees fahrenheit last week.

I could not help but wonder what life would be like if my survival depended on that potato crop.

Chat later,

Phebagirl
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Unread postby Ghog » Sat 30 Jul 2005, 22:02:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'i')ronic that you should mention biointensive. My husband and I are planning on attending a class on raised bed biointensive as soon as we get the time to drive to southern Missouri.


Let us know what you learn when the time comes. I am studying the techniques now, but don't have the farming background you and your husband do.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') guess when I speak of a failure of small farming, I am speaking of the ability to feed massive numbers of people. With a small biointensive farm my husband and I could probably feed ourselves, our kids, and grandkids.


I think mainly when it comes to surviving PO, this will be the only thought of most small communities. As you will find on here, most expect a major dieoff of population, so figuring out how to feed 6 billion people probably won't be needed. It sounds harsh, and it would be a shame, but we just have too many people on a rapidly declining planet. I enjoy hearing more and more people saying how happy they are despite being poor or not having the big fancy home. I too am learning to enjoy my life in more simple terms. And I am a modern gadget guy at heart. (Working on the family slowly but surely.) As I am in constant learning mode right now, my big goal is to get the debts down and buy 30-40 acres.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')aised bed gardening has downsides. The worst being drainage of water.
Double digging is labor intensive. But, then from what I have read, we are heading into a period of history where almost everybody will be involved in labor intensive activity.


Tell me when you get to 'sloped beds' and 'bent beds' techniques. I'm really curious how they might help you with the situation you are dealing with now. (drought) Evaporation reduction by close spacing and better upper levels of compost (in good soil) reduce the water needed as well. Also with my (new) understanding, double-digging is alot of work intially, but as you improve the soil, it becomes less necessary allowing a UBar dig in some types of soil. It will be alot of work either way though. Just say the word, I'll come help out. :-D

In any case, it won't be an easy life. You already know this, which gives you an advantage. You sound mentally prepared which is half the ball game not to mention your hands-on experience. Experimenting with Biointensive techniques is what I am going to work on while I have the time (up until PO). Take care.
User avatar
Ghog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron