by EnergySpin » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 23:35:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'E')nergySpin I've bookmarked that site, good one. And, you make a very good point - it's not the other guy, it's YOU. It's me. Less population does not mean you get to drive a "boat car" etc., and just because the 3rd world'ers are breeding like flies, does not make the modern American way of life sustainable. This is the same point the anti-car people make, if you get in your car and complain about traffic, remember that you're there in your car- you're traffic!
My own energy footprint is very small for an American, the easiest way to make a big difference was to get rid of the car. But it's still far from where it should be. The long term plan is to get out of debt and to have energy and financial needs way down, grow a lot of my own food or gather it, etc.
It is true that there's a horrible amount of hypocrasy to sit in a house in America with 2 SUVs in the driveway and a jet-ski in the garage, and declare it's the 3rd world's problem. You have to walk the walk - and becoming more low-energy use and more sufficient does a lot to starve the multinational beast that's committing 99% of the racism in this world, the destruction of habitat and lifeways of other peoples in the 3rd world.
I think I'm going to take my white ass up to the store and commit the hate crime of buying some dinner from that nice Korean biz I like to inflict my money on........
Yes ... I was pissed off today by other people about this . Last night I started reading the article in Nature about global warming and the Amazon. I had to get drunk ... it was depressing (maybe I should sue the bastards

). Today at work I was arguing that the mere fact of knowing that our consumerist lifestyle is destroying the planet should force us to adopt a system of values AGAINST consumerism. The people I argued with , maintained that it is not natural and that simply knowing that something is bad is not enough to justify a change in ethics if not enough people are doing it. Due to the usual PC crap I could not use the case of slavery; people used to to do that on a grand scale less than 2 centuries ago. But the fact that slavery was widely adopted does not mean it was ethically correct (even though people used different arguments to justify this).
Anyway ... the people I argued with started making the usual crap about medical treatments . But I will save this for a latter post.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.