by asg70 » Sun 19 Apr 2020, 12:19:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Simon_R', '
')Since my time here, it seems that we have all forgotten the timeline of the curve, we are (as far as I can see) on the bumpy plateau, the data seems to reflect this.
The next is the bumpy descent, now all that is to be talked about (to me) is the speed and nature of the descent.
And what I see time and again is an attempt to wrap any and all current events with vague labels (like bumpy plateau) in order to keep the causative relationship between world events and peak oil. Again, the world is more complicated than that. The world does not spin solely based on the amount of conventional crude being pumped in the ground. Is it a dominant factor? Yes. Is it the ONLY factor? No. This was the lesson I and many others learned in 2008 and other did not.
Consider that there have been recessions, wars, etc... wholly independent of oil charts. The dot com bubble was one, for instance. And yet some peakers have adopted such a tunnel-vision 1:1 mentality that they use oil exactly the same way the church lady evokes satan, as a convenient symbol in order to explain the world's ills. It provides comfort in its simplicity. It functions like religion. This analogy seems to be lost on those who are so far down that rabbit hole.
If someone wants to be deluded like that, that's their business. However, it doesn't really speak well beyond the immediate echo chamber. There WAS a time when the mainstream DID take peak oil seriously. People like the late Matt Simmons were frequent guests on cable news. I don't really see a vector for peak oil to reenter the public conversation as long as people continue to try to make weak connections between current events and peak oil (ETP being the most flagrant case). All this does is further degrade what little credibility peak oil has left.