by sparky » Fri 03 Apr 2020, 04:32:16
.
Quoting form one of the News item
" The thing is, you have to build redundancy into the system, some overcapacity.
If you have capacity, then you don’t have to slow down things so much. Think of fire-fighting. Fires are quick, they need to be attacked quickly. You have to
have overcapacity. Fire engines sitting around idly, seemingly uselessly, until the call comes. Firefighters being bored, playing cards (or, rather, playing their
smartphones). But no-one will say, “We don’t need so many of them if they don’t actually work.” At some point, they will be needed, in a flash.
And that goes for the health care system as well. There should have been many more hospital beds available (even if empty most of the time), more respirators,
protective suits, and so forth. If you don’t have that infrastructure, you will have to build it quickly, "
I don't see the Pentagon arguing on what they need now , they always argue what they might need if there is a crisis
same for health infrastructure , you need some serious slack to cope with overflow
take the electrical industry , they Know they need excess capacity ready to cope with a crisis and they do , very well and quite unreported
the rule in Australia is they need to have ready within a couple of minutes the same spare production as the largest producer on line
If you tailor your system to the tightest requirement on a fair day , one thing is for sure , on a bad day you will not cope
For shame ,protected by corrupt politicians, the life of US patients has been discounted as little more than a juicy market for the medical industry ,