Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

How tech won't save us

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

How tech won't save us

Unread postby Blech » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 08:23:48

Hi Folks,
First post here, just a comment. I'm a physicist and an engineer, and from practical experience I have no faith that technology will save us. I don't know of any theory on this concept, but in my many years of experience I've seen the problem of, I don't know what to call it, say 'Escalading Technologies'.
Again, purely from experience, the difficulty with tech is that it increasingly becomes harder to maintain the more complicated it gets. You have to solve problems, and usally then solve problems that your problems caused. For example, mankind discovered oil. Then we found we could make a car to use the stuff. This is great, we can quickly get from one place to another. Oops, only if we have a good road. OK, build roads. Oops, now there's huge consumption of oil, find more wells. Oops, all the burning of oil is fouling the air and water, find some so called clean technology. Oops, those catalytic converters take rare materials, better find more. And so on. A simple example, but you get the idea.
The technocrats I work with are convinced that 'something - something you can't even imagine will come along'. Unfortunatly I think not. OIl is beautiful, stick a pipe in the ground and step back before it sprays you in the eye. Nothing comes close to it in terms of value, density and convienence. Hydrogen is a dream, it's too high on the technology ladder to be of any use. Especially for auto's, which is the most garguantuan waste of energy the planet has ever seen. The only long term sources of energy we have are geo and solar. But they'll never equal oil.
Having said this, I don't think we need to be saved. Our modern way of life (especially in America) is a perversity. I've, almost effortlessly, reduced my energy consumption by probably 70% (don't drive, electrical and gas). And I'm now living on a more sane, human scale of proportion.

Blech
User avatar
Blech
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Aaron » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 08:30:55

Great Post,

Blech has managed to describe the law of diminishing returns, note the difference in scale between oil & oil alternatives. & observed that this might not be such a bad thing...

In 1 paragraph.

Nice...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby Blech » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 08:44:56

Thanks Aaron. Diminishing returns, as you say is the effect. In the case of technology the cause (in my experience) is usually this phenomenon of problems which cause more problems. If the creation rate of problems is par or greater than the solve rate it's an unsustainable technology.

In the case of oil, or apples, it's just a darn problem of getting enough of the high quality stuff. Plain resource limitations.

Blech
User avatar
Blech
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed 27 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby killJOY » Thu 28 Jul 2005, 08:56:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Again, purely from experience, the difficulty with tech is that it increasingly becomes harder to maintain the more complicated it gets. You have to solve problems, and usally then solve problems that your problems caused.


This fits nicely into evolutionary thinking, too.

In the natural world, species adapt to new conditions, only to watch those conditions change themselves, in which case they have to readapt.

Many writers call this the "red queen" phenomenon, after the character in Alice in Wonderland who said, "in this place it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ince every improvement in one species will lead to a selective advantage for that species, variation will normally continuously lead to increases in fitness in one species or another. However, since in general different species are coevolving, improvement in one species implies that it will get a competitive advantage on the other species, and thus be able to capture a larger share of the resources available to all. This means that fitness increase in one evolutionary system will tend to lead to fitness decrease in another system. The only way that a species involved in a competition can maintain its fitness relative to the others is by in turn improving its design.


http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/REDQUEEN.html

Matt Ridley's book on sexual selection is even called "The Red Queen."

This is the world we're stuck with. No, I don't have "faith" in technology, either.


Get down on your knees and worship Murphy instead.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^


Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests