$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'F')lat earthers
NOT the Flat Earth Society whom they debunk.
https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEP ... id=US%3Aen
PeakOil is You
Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by EnergyUnlimited » Mon 18 Nov 2019, 07:32:22
I have red somewhere on the internet arguments that Magellan was funded by Rothschilds.
Also know one person who insists that Google maps are made base on spy aircraft photos because flight on the orbit is impossible. Nevertheless this guy doesn't believe in flat Earth. However he *does* suspect that Moon is an Alien spacecraft and it is hollow inside because otherwise it would be too heavy and fall on the Earth.
He doesn't believe that there an empty space between Earth and Moon. He thinks it is a big balloon like object suspended in air about 100 miles above the ground.
My auntie who is a professor of physics takes more philosophic approach.
She would say that an adequate model built base on non- Euclidean geometry assuming flat or rather Mobius strip like Earth in hyperspace with at least 4 spatial dimensions could indeed be constructed and would describe working of Universe, including celestial mechanics correctly. Maths would be very challenging though, at least for those not skilled in the art.
But in her opinion such a model should be rejected base on considerations related to Ockham razor.
-
EnergyUnlimited - Light Sweet Crude
- Posts: 7537
- Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by Newfie » Mon 18 Nov 2019, 15:28:32
Just sailed from Grenada to Cariacou, watched the island raise up over the curve horizon.
-
Newfie - Forum Moderator
- Posts: 18651
- Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
- Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by dissident » Mon 18 Nov 2019, 23:30:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yl-FIUi2MI
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
- dissident
- Expert
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by careinke » Tue 19 Nov 2019, 01:45:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'J')ust sailed from Grenada to Cariacou, watched the island raise up over the curve horizon.
Fly above 45,000 Feet, and you will know the earth is a sphere. Just sayin.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
-
careinke - Volunteer
- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
- Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by EnergyUnlimited » Wed 20 Nov 2019, 02:48:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'h')ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yl-FIUi2MI
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
Unfortunately it is to a degree true what lefties are writing.
I was working for pharma in my professional career.
Companies were reluctant to run clinical trials on females, particularly those below age of 40.
Hence males were overrepresented in many trials, particularly those considered more risky.
Know it first hand.
-
EnergyUnlimited - Light Sweet Crude
- Posts: 7537
- Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Re: Progressive Mental Disease in the US and Elsewhere
by dissident » Thu 21 Nov 2019, 01:24:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'h')ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yl-FIUi2MI
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
So called leftist alt-media is spreading some mind numbing inanity. The clowns at Vox want their viewers to believe that pharmaceuticals are designed only with men in mind and that women are an after-thought. This is BS designed for people without a clue. Sex-specific pharmacology is essential since women and men are not identical metabologically. Some drugs like statins are universal, but there are other drugs that are sex-specific.
The notion that drug trials somehow are weighted towards males is total BS as well. They would not be random samples if that was true, which would then defeat their whole purpose.
Then we have the cherry on top of this turd cake: according to the "left" there is no physical difference between males and females (I guess sex organs and mammary glands are to be put in the memory hole). Then they whinge about discrimination by the alleged patriarchy ignoring female physical differences.
Unfortunately it is to a degree true what lefties are writing.
I was working for pharma in my professional career.
Companies were reluctant to run clinical trials on females, particularly those below age of 40.
Hence males were overrepresented in many trials, particularly those considered more risky.
Know it first hand.
I don't think you had the full picture. What were the specific reasons for not including women under 40? It makes no sense whatsoever. By contrast, excluding pregnant females or females wanting to have children from trials is legitimate. So Vox is spreading shit regardless of your comment.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644551/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 181730275X
So do we have 5:3 women in trials vs men since it is the elderly that consume most drugs?
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-01- ... rials.html
Proof Vox is spreading lies.
- dissident
- Expert
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
