Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil and the Last Great Rape of Nature

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Peak Oil and the Last Great Rape of Nature

Unread postby seldom_seen » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 21:27:12

If we manage to slip through the resource wars without nuking each other to smithereens. My greatest fear is the devolution of industrial civilization in the form of the last great rape of nature.

I see the following:

-- Massive deforestation due to people using wood for heating and cooking.
-- Complete mountain ranges and landscapes reduced to rubble and pollution to get at oil shales and coal beds.
-- dark skies of soot and smoke.
-- fish and game wiped out on a massive scale as enforcement breaks down, and people take what they can get from the land.
-- a breakdown in waste disposal and sewage systems.

Some of these forces are well underway, but post peak I see them accelerating to a catastrophic level. Whereby the environmental degradation will make a die-off that much more likely and large scale due to the greatly reduced carrying capacity of the land.

Just trying to think positive today.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby EnergySpin » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 22:22:07

Seldom_Seen this is why the "devolution" should not let happen (at least not in the sense you are alluding to).
Some industries have to go; but the ones that can help with survival i.e. energy, mass transit, agricutlutre and international transport have to survive at the expense of others. That might include heavy subsidies but so be it.
It is the third world that will inflict the last hit if left to their own devices. A wind turbine and a small hydrogen storage capacity SHOULD BE SPENT THERE and not here. If we left them to their own, then the scenario you descirbe will happen. We have to make choices ... choices that will help with human and environmental survival. It will be humans who will inflict the final rape that's why any proposal to let the system take the nosedive is crime against nature
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ghog » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 22:58:42

Unfortunately a real possibility. Which is why we need preparation, so the desperation factor isn't there. If humanity isn't at its end, then they probably won't burn, rape and pillage.
User avatar
Ghog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania

Unread postby EnergySpin » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 23:01:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ghog', 'U')nfortunately a real possibility. Which is why we need preparation, so the desperation factor isn't there. If humanity isn't at its end, then they probably won't burn, rape and pillage.

Choices will have to be made . I know that most people do not want to talk about it, but the post fossil fuel economy is going to be about infrastructure. Maintaining the infrastructure, conserving nature etc. There will be progress or development but not growth. It might even be advantageous to pay people NOT to work . But the nature of the post peak economy will be a different thread :)
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby FireJack » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 23:17:00

I wouldn't worry about doomsday scenerios too much. What will actually happen is impossible to predict, it really depends on how governemnts and people react. The best course of action (as far as I can tell) is to become as self sufficient as possible.
Mabey after the initial chaos subsides there will be complete environmental destruction but without cheap energy that will be difficult. I think adaptibilty will be the key. That and getting out of california.
User avatar
FireJack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby MicroHydro » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 23:20:26

How was the world saved in H.G.Wells "War of the Worlds"?

Microbes

How will the planet save herself from the human infestation?

Microbes

I trust in mother nature to thin the human herd before we can cut the last tree and kill the last fish.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby gego » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 00:48:18

I am not sure there will be a last great rape of the forrests. Where forrests are privately owned, there is not likely to be overuse. It will only be government owned or controlled lands that will be raped.

There is no way that an individual who intends to rely on his forrest to provide wood and game will do anything but manage his property to best provide for him and his family in the long run.

I think that people will dieoff much more quickly than can be defeated by the protection of private ownership of property.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby savethehumans » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 01:47:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t might even be advantageous to pay people NOT to work.

Where do I sign up? :-D

Seriously, I'm glad seldom_seen added that most of the horrible things he sees happening are already happening. Post-peak, if those things CAN get worse, they WILL get worse. That, unfortunately, is human nature when fear and tragedy get overwhelming.

The :( part is, that IS my optimistic view!

That the chaos and die-offs come rapidly and end rapidly would be the most merciful thing for the remaining life on this planet--human, animal, and plant. It'd mean less time for panicked people to destroy all that those who prepared for this had built up. Ergo, more to build on when the worst of it is over. (That is, if GW and CC, also man-made, don't destroy all the remaining life on this planet. . . . :cry: )
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby EnergySpin » Wed 27 Jul 2005, 01:55:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Post-peak, if those things CAN get worse, they WILL get worse

Only if we let them get worse. Sorry to sound rude, but if you think that nothing can be done, why not end it for yourself now?
Or arent you the doomer you think you are? :roll:
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron