Tesla appears to have engineered a profitable quarter with accounting tricks and delaying capex. Meanwhile it's fundamentals are detertiorating: Falling top and bottom lines, growing debt, and falling y/y margins with it's largest markets in the
US and
China cutting subsidies. I don't see how they are going to keep capex low going forward with so much on the board: Shanghai factory, model Y, semi truck production, European factory, etc. My guess is we will see first half of 2020 showing more red ink, just like this year. Perhaps with a surge in sales in Q4 this year to take advantage of the last gasp of US tax subsidies before they expire permanently on Jan 1, 2020.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '*') On Oct. 23, Tesla reported a surprise profit for the third quarter of 2019.
* The profit was largely attributed to efficiency gains and cost reductions, but the scale of the sequential change looks improbable.
* A deeper dive into the financials shows that the profit came thanks to a mix of deferred revenue recognition, elevated regulatory credit sales, throttled-back capex, and stretched payables.
* Tesla showed year-over-year declines to auto margins, revenues, and net income; that is not a healthy trend for a company priced for growth.
* It appears that Tesla pulled out all the stops to engineer a profitable quarter, but the underlying problems facing the business remain; sustainable profitability remains very much in doubt.
On the surface, it appears that Tesla bulls have much to crow about. Virtually no one expected a profit, after all. However, upon a closer inspection of the financial results reported in Tesla's Q3 update letter, it is clear that the profit was largely ephemeral. Indeed, Tesla appears to be far from "financially self-sustaining", despite CEO Elon Musk's latest boasts.
However, the rosy profit picture starts to wilt almost immediately upon deeper inspection. Consider the top line: Tesla brought in $6.3 billion in revenue, which was a sequential decline from Q2, in addition to falling below analysts' expectations. But, if the top line did not grow, how did Tesla make a profit?
Diving Deeperby stretching payables and expanding accrued liabilities, Tesla was able to keep more than $200 million in negative cash flow from trickling into its other financial statements. Netting out just this maneuver would see Tesla's GAAP positive income turn into a loss. Moreover, virtually all of Tesla's expanded cash balance can be accounted for by its growing debt.
Coming Up for AirAt this point, it is abundantly clear that Tesla has manufactured another "miracle quarter" in much the same fashion that it did in Q3 and Q4 of 2018. Stretching payables, slashing capex, adjusting depreciation, recognizing deferred revenue, and cashing in piles of regulator credits can help create the appearance of profitability. However, they are not sustainable maneuvers. Tesla has suffered a significant year-over-year decline on both top and bottom lines.
That is the real crux of the challenge facing Tesla. Though the company has managed to engineer another profit thanks to a number of accounting gimmicks and one-off maneuvers, it could not come anywhere near its performance of the same period last year. That is a very bad sign for a company with a market capitalization of about $50 billion.
Investor's Eye ViewThe market is not valuing Tesla as an automaker with wafer-thin margins and occasional profitability; it is valuing Tesla on the basis of massive top line and bottom line growth over the next few years. That Q3 profit does not look too great when viewed in this light.
Investors hoping for Tesla to grow into its already-eye-watering valuation must ask themselves how it can achieve its promised growth goals in light of year-over-year declines to top and bottom lines, sequential decline in revenues, and the visible absence of any meaningful growth capex.