by Carlhole » Tue 25 Oct 2005, 09:34:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RedJake', 'H')earing about the British soldiers arrested in Basra was troubling to say the least, since then I've gone back to the 'the plan was to have no plan' theory.
I like that Ron Paul though, from what I've heard and read, I understand the case for exit, but whats the strategy?
Washington's politicians are controlled by large transnational corporations who have a globalist agenda to trounce national sovereignties [sounds ridicuous in nutshell format]. There are many books written about this. There's a video you can rent called "The Corporation" that is a good introduction.
I'm not anxious to see the demise of state sovereignty however. I don't think competitors like China think that way at all - exactly opposite, in fact.
Instead of going to war in Iraq (in order to grab and retain global corporate imperial power), I would have wanted our leaders to adopt policies that reflect common sense such as this article, written a few years ago by several eminently qualified individuals - Timothy E. Wirth, C. Boyden Gray, and John D. Podesta, From Foreign Affairs, July/August 2003
The Future of Energy Policy$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Foreign Affairs', 'S')ummary: The debate over energy policy in the United States has consistently failed to grapple with the large issues at stake. It is time for an ambitious new approach to U.S. strategic energy policy, one that deals with the problems of oil dependence, climate change, and the developing world's lack of access to energy.
Timothy E. Wirth is President of the United Nations Foundation and a former U.S. Senator from Colorado. C. Boyden Gray is a partner at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering and served as Counsel to former President George H.W. Bush. John D. Podesta is Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center and served as Chief of Staff to former President Bill Clinton. The views expressed here are the authors' alone.