by shortonoil » Thu 21 Mar 2019, 11:28:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')hort, this is a comment about your last graph about the GDP disconnecting from oil production.
Could there be a factor in causing the disconnect that represents the unexpectedly (by major forecasters) fast rise of renewable energy? I know that the starting base-% is low so that in early years this could be ignored, but at some stage as the energy mix transforms linking GDP to just one source of energy is bound to bring distortions.
So looking that the chart you are saying there is disaster in store, whereas I can look at it as wonder if the transformation from oil is working (and showing up in the charts)
HI Ed, thanks for your comment.
According to the EIA in 2015 12% of world marketable energy production came from renewables; that has been a 6 fold increase since 1960. World renewable energy production has grown from 2% of total consumption to 12% in 66 years. During that same 66 year period total extractable petroleum reserves have fallen from 80% of URR to 15%. If renewable are going to replace petroleum before it reaches 0% of URR, they will have to grow much, much faster than they have historically.
The question then:
"I can look at it as wonder if the transformation from oil is working" is implying that perhaps renewables are replacing oil production? If that were the case it would require fewer barrels to produce the same GDP. The points on the graph of chart 139a would be moving to the left of the curve; instead they are moving to the right (2012 to 2016 anomaly). It seems more likely that the monetary base has changed, or that it is requiring more oil to generate the same GDP.
The major change in our relationship with oil has come from technological advances. The computer revolution that began in the 60' has changed how much we travel, to where, and why. Petroleum is still what powers the vast majority of the world's transportation fleet, but computer technology now allows us to accomplish digitally what once required travel. It has also made what travel that is necessary more efficient; the modern vehicle has now become a computer with a steering wheel attached. TCMs, ECMs and half a dozen other computer systems in modern vehicles produce high efficiencies for operations and maintenance, but most of all they allow the burning of the ever lower quality fuels coming to the market. Those fuels are made in a refinery that is run, and could only be run by a very advanced computer system.
Other technologies have had a significant impact on our relationship with petroleum. Material science advances have revolutionized architecture, transportation, communications, and health care to name just a few. We can hope that ongoing advances can take some of the bite out of the 2030 "dead state" event. But hope is a piss poor strategy to base an entire civilization upon.
Like Siamese twins modern civilization is still bound head, and shoulders to oil.
