by KaiserJeep » Wed 27 Feb 2019, 11:58:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I')t's really interesting to think about. We are told that we can't do anything about our own suicidal trajectory because it might hurt the economy. What good is an "economy" when there is no place to spend it? This system helps some of us out, but the lines of refugees aren't going to partake of it.
The flip side of that same coin: Approximately 3/4ths of those 7.7B humans are completely dependant upon burning FF's to live. The use of FF's for agriculture is the main reason, but FF's are also used to process and transport food, and to refrigerate/freeze fresh foods.
Your prescription for "saving us from Climate Change" would starve approximately six billion humans. Best be prepared to make your case to those same 6 billion that their deaths are necessary to save the planet.
It is popular around here to believe that the 6 billion victims of CC hysteria would be the Western World, and that the "noble poor peoples" of the world will survive because they are more in tune with Nature and better prepared for hardship. This is in fact total claptrap, in a worldwide petroleum marketplace, those with the MOST MONEY eat and the poor starve. The country of Venezuela has huge oil reserves, but can't feed itself without the entire infrastructure of oil refineries and a fuel distribution system it cannot keep running.
The Western World of course is the only one even attempting to do anything about Climate Change. But at the same time, they are exporting oil/coal/natural gas to the Third World, along with food grown with petroleum fuels. India and China are each bringing a new coal power plant online each week on avaerage, I am told. So go tell the Indians and Chinese that they need to starve to save the planet.
Good luck with that.