by StarvingLion » Mon 07 May 2018, 20:45:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'T') – Good point. But the thread title brings me back to the same point I’ll forever keep beating on. Which is: define a shortage. For the Rockman it’s simple: when there are buyers who can afford the price of diesel but there’s not enough to satisfy all those potential buyers. And that would be a very rare condition to develop: sellers wold simply raise prices and eliminate those potential buyers. IOW raise prices until supply equals demand. With demand defined as the volume of diesel buyers can afford to buy.
The most like scenario for a diesel “shortage” would be govt price controls.
Absolutely right. When the US government tried price controls in the 70's during the big oil price spikes due to the Middle East turmoil, we got long gas lines and "out of gas" conditions, as people resorted to hoarding, etc.
Unless ETP theory turned out to be magically correct and suddenly producers couldn't "afford" to produce oil and consumers couldn't "afford" the necessary price raises needed to fund producing it EN MASSE, simple economics re competitive markets and the pricing function takes care of the "problem".
Now (for one example) idiots who bought a $50,000 huge diesel guzzling truck they can't afford, and can't afford rising oil prices at some point -- the result is kind of harsh on them.
Doomers would claim that's a sign of doom. Others would call that a "teaching moment" for the idiots (and if in a pinch, cheap used, high MPG sedans do exist).
Here is why you are hopelessly doomed, Outcast_Searcher. You'll be worm food by 2023. I call it The Oil Apocalypse:
s – I guess they are some kind of investment firm are they? I always like the price predictions that show things historically swinging all over the place and then a nice smooth linear or exponential trend off into the future, but that’s been avoided here (just showing actual futures).
I think he didn’t make the case for the drop off in recent discoveries being as important as it is going to prove; I think he probably thinks everything gets solved there at the right price level.
They can also be used to get round surface constraints like water injection/processing limits, but there’s a limit, especially on mature fields. A lot of the low hanging fruit was picked in the high price years. In-fill wells on deep water fields can be very expensive, and on recent projects that have been more optimally designed with latest seismic data and often have production heavily front loaded, may not not yield so much.
The drop off in discoveries also means there are fewer short cycle tie-back opportunities –