by Tanada » Sat 29 Sep 2018, 07:17:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jedrider', 'J')ust a quick reply here. I did NOT say I believed 'she believed'. I explicitly stated I believed that she told THE truth, not HER truth.
Sexual Assault is being bandied about like Bill Clinton played with the word 'IS'. That's another topic completely, though.
I am listening a little to some of the testimony (very little, as I am not that into this business at all, i.e. I'm not a wonk

).
I must say Kavanaught strikes me as one slimy political operative and I would not believe his testimony one bit. He is quite elusive on purpose (and I believe he has adequate memory as well).
I personally take sexual assault extremely seriously.
That doesn't mean I must accept the testimony of Dr. Ford specifying who her perpetrator was when she can not specify the location, year, or other circumstances with any clarity.
Memory is a vastly malleable aspect of the human mind and it is not difficult to associate someone you knew as a teen who is now everywhere in the news with an old memory of something awful that happened to you. The reason justice requires corroborating evidence is human memory is extremely fallible. The more time that passes the more fallible it grows until when we are elderly most of us suffer senility or even Alzheimer's syndrome.
If she named names in her counseling sessions before Kavenaugh was put up for appointment to the court then that would be troubling and require serious review. The fact that her memory has shifted several times (number of parties involved, other details) and did not name Kavenaugh until he was in the news is very troubling.
The fact that Dr. Ford refused to testify Monday because "She is afraid to fly" but then flew in to testify Thursday and under questioning admitted she had flown for vacation and business multiple times in 2018 already calls into question all her other testimony.
Look I am afraid of heights and absolutely loath flying. The last time I took a plane anywhere was 1 round trip in 2008 and before that I had only flown one round trip in 2006, one in 2005 and one in 1982. If you are actually "afraid of flying" you take every step possible to avoid it from career choice to choice of vacation destination. All of my aughties flights were under the impetus of a spouse I am no longer married to. You put me in front of anyone under oath and my flying experience supports my statement I am "afraid of flying".
If you lie about one thing, like flying, it automatically calls into question every other claim you make. Anywhere outside of the political circus that is Washington D.C. Dr. Ford would not be treated as a credible witness. The simple fact that her initial accusation was anonymous and she declined the offer to testify on Monday would have ended the matter in any court proceeding in a civilized country. Because this is the political circus and the Media is on the side of opposing everything President Trump does or says Dr. Ford has been held up as the standard bearer of that opposition despite the problems with her story.
Either people are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or they are not. There are massive reasons to doubt Dr. Fords memory and no corroborating witnesses or physical evidence. Not even a 'dear diary the most awful thing happened today' entry from her youth. Absence of evidence is not proof of innocence, but it makes the whole case he said-she said which is not evidence of guilt.