by Tanada » Tue 18 Sep 2018, 14:33:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('asg70', '
')It damn well does matter.
As far as I'm conerned this "they're all bad" cynicism is at its worst a veiled attempt to shield the right and at worst a fatalistic abandonment of civic duty.
As much as I tried to be conciliatory in my last post I have to say that this post by asg70 nails it better than I could.
THIS thread is about cultural memes. I am trying to demonstrate to you Ibon that your acceptance of behaviors by Politicians with a D while slamming everything done by a politician with an R is pure partisanship.
Herin you quote ASG proclaiming his opinion that supporting any R under any circumstance is 'abandoning civic duty' simply because it doesn't support the D candidate or politician or goal or life choice in some way.
Sorry but when you paint the world in blue and red proclaiming every blue policy beatifically good and every red policy undeniably evil you are not being rational in any way, shape, manner or form.
Especially when if I make an effort I can pull up examples of the EXACT SAME POLICY being proclaimed good when being proposed/enacted by a D leader and evil when proposed or enacted by an R leader.
Whenever someone points out that THE EXACT SAME THING was done by a D all we here is "Why do you keep dredging up the past only look at what is happening RIGHT NOW". It is not dredging up the past to engage in pattern recognition, it is a requirement if you are looking for a pattern. If a D does something AND they get a free pass from the MSM and left wing of politics believers then rationally an R doing the EXACT SAME THING should also get a free pass. Contrariwise if an R gets condemnation and histrionic declarations for a policy or act then a D doing the EXACT SAME THING should also be condemned and persecuted for doing whatever awful act was done.
You and Cog are two sides of the exact same coin, if he says its good you proclaim it is evil and vice verse. Sorry but my world view is a heck of a lot broader than D and R, both parties have done terrible things in pursuit of power and both parties have ignored vital responsibilities like maintaining infrastructure and encourage energy saving practices. Oh sure we get campaign speeches about shovel ready jobs and ethanol fuel subsidies, but what do they ACTUALLY DO other than give speeches?
How do I know a political speech was filled with lies? Easy, the politicians lips were moving and words came out. Meanwhile the 'True Believers' in each party pay zero attention to what their flavor of politician actually DOES. Even worse when what was promised in the pretty speech isn't delivered they happily give their flavor politician a pass and blame all the failures on the other flavors of politician who might have disagreed with whatever it was.
This blind tribal 'brand loyalty' doesn't accomplish a flippin thing because me complaining about your favorite politician or Cog's favorite politician doesn't influence either IBON nor COG, nor the politician being criticized. The only way for things to get better is if Cog and his fellow R loyalists write/call/vote for R politicians who do not break their word and then blame the D party and Ibon and his fellow D party loyalists write/call/vote for D politicians who do what they say they will do and not use the R party as the scapegoat for getting out of their promises.
I GUARANTEE that if Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton were the current occupant of the White House they would be simply pointing at the R congress and proclaiming the 'evil opposition' was the reason none of their campaign promises was being enacted.
Even worse so long as you remain blind to the problem and refuse to work within your party to fix the problem you are part of the problem. I do not belong to either of the major parties though I did have to register R to vote in the 2016 primary election (I did not want either HC or BS as President so no point in participating in their primary) and the candidate I wanted wasn't even running by the time the vote came around. In fact President Trump was way down my list of acceptable candidates but by the time the primary came around there were only three left standing, one whom I despise and two who were marginal at best.
In a perfect world all of the primary elections would be on the same day in November of the year before the Presidential election so everyone could actually vote for the candidate they wanted instead of picking through the leftovers. That would give everyone a fair shot and it would also eliminate about eight months of political advertisements. It would also mean the parties would know who the actual top 3-5 were going into the convention and the caucus would actually have to choose between them like they did in the old days of the 19th century instead of having one candidate with a majority going to the convention simply to be proclaimed leader. In 1984-88-92-96-2000-04-08-12-16 both parties knew who their candidate was months before the convention which rather makes the convention a pointless week long party. There is not debate or disagreement on the party platform, it is whatever the majority holding candidate says it is with little if anything added from the VP candidate and basically nothing from the party membership.
So cultural meme, is it
A) more important to blame the other party for your failures or
B) more important to actually lead the voters into accomplishing some lasting change?
If all you ever focus on is A) then you will never ever (ever ever ever) accomplish B). Therefore if B) matters to you at all you need to reevaluate how you deal with A).
Leaders lead.