by rayo » Sat 12 Feb 2022, 15:11:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'M')artenson is a huckster for precious metals, and has been for years. PMs are currency, a symbol for value. To me, there is nothing that inherently makes PMs superior to pieces of paper with green ink pictures of dead presidents on them. Both are symbols for real value. Perhaps the PM coins and bars retain value for a few days longer than printed currency, a delusion created by the hucksters, but after a week or so, all currency value symbols are equally worthless. Any other interpretation would be unbearably optimistic. For example, if my food supply was insufficient to satisfy my appetites, I'll trade for other food or other necessities of life, but no form of currency, because symbols for value don't provide any nourishment.
Perhaps you feel differently. Good luck with that.
PMs used to make me uncomfortable. They "can't be eaten" as it's usually put. However upon further inspection, they start making sense. For a long list of reasons, they were the perfect token of exchange in the past where they stood the test of time (several millenia), and they could well again be in a low energy future, where the power of fiat money to expand the money supply will be pointless.
Ultimately an economy even a simple one cannot function on bartering. Could a technologically advanced mint that produces coins and bills with security features make pms pointless? Could the government be trusted? Idk. But even then pms have an allure and beauty that base metals and paper money will never have.
One thing is for sure, one way or another, fiat money will crash and burn, the certainty of that is 100%. The stock market too. Only farmland and pms look solid. And PMs will surely be a robust wealth protector in the future. I don't see a way they lose their value significantly.
Well actually I do. The two major hurdles I see in the future come from the government. 1) the government bans or confiscates them
2) the government imposes an electronic currency in order to gain control over the disgruntled populace when there isn't enough energy for vehicles, heating, etc.
In any case there is no perfect investment and you need to weigh the pros and the cons.