by GHung » Mon 04 Dec 2017, 14:49:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'K')J said; "But I'm not of the opinion that each homestead must be totally independant either. I believe that completely independant homesteads will perish relatively soon. I believe they are too burdensome in terms of labor and required materials to persist beyond a year or two of intense misery. As a member of a viable and vital community of a few dozen to a few thousand people, you have a much better chance of living many more years."
Another binary conclusion. The two are not mutually exclusive, nor are they an either/or plan. One can have a largely indepen
dent homestead while being an important member of a community. Indeed, some of the most independent folks I know are deeply involved in their community.
As for
"too burdensome in terms of labor and required materials to persist beyond a year or two of intense misery", that's is also a bias you have. Misery for me was going to the same job day after day, year after year sitting in a cubical producing virtual BS on a computer screen that will quickly become obsolete. Seemed like a helluva way to waste a life. And my material needs have dropped, not gone up.
My goal is to reduce complexity in my life. Seems you plan the opposite.