by Outcast_Searcher » Mon 09 Jul 2018, 22:28:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I')f you look at a chart of ownership rates/ home price, there are bumps before both the S&L (neg amortization) and subprime crashes. That doesn't indicate some weird increase in demand, it indicates banks a running a scam.
But not just "banks"; brokers, appraisers, agents, inspectors, insurance cos, the whole system knew it was a scam. Hell, I knew it was. I felt terrible selling to that nice young couple for almost 3x what I'd paid a few years previously.
But I did it anyway.
...
Just looked it up, it's still $100k underwater
.
Ok. (I'm trying to understand what you believe here).
So are the rapid price rises for housing in big cities around the world part of the banking "scam", or is that something else?
To me, although clearly there was dishonesty and greed in a hot real estate market (like tends to occur in ALL hot markets, over time), that doesn't put banks at the center of what was happening re prices.
I still put supply, demand, perception, and greed (and greed from homebuyers, not the banks) as major components when prices rocketed upward. And lack of demand (due to weak economies), perception, and fear as major components when the prices plummeted.
...
So I think where you see banks as the puppetmaster pulling all (or the vast majority of) the strings, I see the banks as a big, powerful player, but only holding a relative handful of the strings. And considering it's government that gives them their power and regulates them, I have to blame government for enabling a lot of the dishonesty.
...
And I don't see why you should feel bad for selling your house for its market price to a willing buyer -- as long as you weren't misrepresenting anything material, that is. (Do you feel bad for selling a stock which appreciated a lot as news changed? I don't.)
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.