[onlooker]

Are they really Conspiracy theories or the truth?
http://www.neonnettle.com/feed/198-top- ... to-be-fact
Top 20 'Crazy' Conspiracy Theories That Were Proven to be Fact

[Rod_Cloutier]

Broken link. We likely have threads to every conspiracy theory known here already.

Still, I'm really worried about chemtrails though:

https://youtu.be/TDvLCPe8viU?t=261

This stuff is really scary if true...

[SeaGypsy]

Contrails are, chemtrails are a made up load of bollocks designed to add discredit to the whole notion of conspiracy. One step away from flat earth. 1/ contrails are a totally natural effect of aircraft changing air pressure & condensation, they provide no evidence of chemical application. 2/ there's zero evidence of the supposedly vast amount of chemicals being- supplied, stored, or any mechanism installed on the 10s of thousands of aircraft supposedly involving. 9/11 is the real deal, these idiot theories only exist to make anyone questioning 9/11 appear as stupid as possible- aka flat earth.

[charmcitysking]

Consortium News has put out a few articles recently following the 50 year anniversary of the assassination of Robert Kennedy. Even the MSM has picked it up - Washington Post published an article about RFK Jr. questioning the official narrative after meeting Sirhan Sirhan in jail.

Also, the concept of 'State Crimes Against Democracy' (SCADS) is a fascinating area of academic research into potential 'conspiracy theories'

[Newfie]

I’m not big on conspiracy theories. Except
1) Oswald May have shot at JFK, he may have even fired the fatal bullet. But that’s not all that happened there and there was at least a second shooter.
2) RFK - do t know much about that, never followed it. Seems fishy. But if JFK was taken out then it follows RFK would be also.

Chemgdails? No.

911 - Probably things we don’t know, but the basic facts sound correct.

[Cog]

Sometimes you can get lucky with shooting. With a scope, at a short distance, its not a impossible shot to make. JFK was a moving target from Oswald's perspective, but he was moving away vertically and not laterally away. That is a much easier shot to make. Remember, Oswald missed with one of his three shots. No information has been released that would have required a second shooter. Just a somewhat lucky Oswald.

[Plantagenet]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charmcitysking', 'W')ashington Post published an article about RFK Jr. questioning the official narrative after meeting Sirhan Sirhan in jail. '

[Newfie]

Cog,

That’s a pretty glib statement, you can explain a lot with “luck.”

AFAIK a test team of 3 professional marksmen were unable to duplicate this feat with that rifle. First the action jammed on about every fith round so most sequences were not completed. Second they were not able to do it consistently even when the rifle did not malfunction. Third they were shooting at a stationary target. Fourth they were shooting at a TARGET not the President. Talk about buck fever. Fifth it was the 3rd bullet that did the deed. By that time Kennedy and Connelly were reacting to the first hit. They were not stationary in any plane.

But there was luck that day, the lucky bullet that fell out of Kennedy’s body onto the stretcher. The one that matched Oswald’s rifle but that had no impact marks.


I don’t expect to convience you but a proof that rests upon “luck” is like saying “well it COULD happen.” Well anything is possible but I’m changing my mind based upon “luck.”

I said I believe Oswald was A shooter and unlikely but perhaps even the fatal shooter. I don’t believe he was the only shooter. That seems to be the crux of the argument in the RFK assination as well.

But we have beaten this aground before. Let’s let it rest.

[Outcast_Searcher]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'C')ontrails are, chemtrails are a made up load of bollocks designed to add discredit to the whole notion of conspiracy. One step away from flat earth. 1/ contrails are a totally natural effect of aircraft changing air pressure & condensation, they provide no evidence of chemical application. 2/ there's zero evidence of the supposedly vast amount of chemicals being- supplied, stored, or any mechanism installed on the 10s of thousands of aircraft supposedly involving. 9/11 is the real deal, these idiot theories only exist to make anyone questioning 9/11 appear as stupid as possible- aka flat earth.

[Rod_Cloutier]

Did any of you actually watch the link I presented above? This looked like clear and unequivocal evidence that people are using weather modification techniques. The speaker is well informed and quite eloquent in his presentation.

It's worth the watch.

[Outcast_Searcher]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rod_Cloutier', 'D')id any of you actually watch the link I presented above? This looked like clear and unequivocal evidence that people are using weather modification techniques. The speaker is well informed and quite eloquent in his presentation.

It's worth the watch.

[Outcast_Searcher]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rod_Cloutier', 'D')id any of you actually watch the link I presented above? This looked like clear and unequivocal evidence that people are using weather modification techniques. The speaker is well informed and quite eloquent in his presentation.

It's worth the watch.

[charmcitysking]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')here are odd things about SIrhan Sirhan and it isn't quite clear what led him to to commit RFK's murder, but there isn't any doubt that Sirhan SIrhan had a gun and that he shot RFK Jr.

[Newfie]

Yes the coroners report seems to be in direct conflict with Sirhan being the one who delivered the fatal shot. Plus there were 13 shots fired from Shirrans 8 shot gun.

There seems to be a LOT of credible evidence of a cover up.

[charmcitysking]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'W')ow, that sounds like the grand conspiracy, like conspiracy cubed or something

[Newfie]

Sure, pass a link.

From Wiki


Etymology

The Oxford English Dictionary defines conspiracy theory as "the theory that an event or phenomenon occurs as a result of a conspiracy between interested parties; spec. a belief that some covert but influential agency (typically political in motivation and oppressive in intent) is responsible for an unexplained event". It cites a 1909 article in The American Historical Review as the earliest usage example,[9][10] although it also appears in journals as early as April 1870.[11] The word "conspiracy" derives from the Latin con- ("with, together") and spirare ("to breathe").

According to John Ayto, the phrase conspiracy theory was originally a neutral term and acquired a pejorative connotation only in the 1960s, with an implication that the theorist is paranoid.[12] Lance deHaven-Smith has suggested that the term was deployed in the 1960s by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to discredit John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories.[13] Robert Blaskiewicz rejects such claims, asserting instead that the term has always been derogatory and pointing to examples demonstrating that this has been so since the nineteenth century.[14][15]

[onlooker]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')When you say you're really worried about chemtrails, don't expect educated people to jump at spending time looking at "evidence" via links. 

[Outcast_Searcher]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')When you say you're really worried about chemtrails, don't expect educated people to jump at spending time looking at "evidence" via links. 

[charmcitysking]

Outcast - are you saying that you believe Oswald fired the fatal shot that killed JFK? There's more evidence to suggest that Kennedy was shot from the front than just the 'magic bullet' theory.

Also, plenty of scientific evidence that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. But it falls into that realm Onlooker described, that because it's not 'officially sanctioned' it gets ignored/discredited.

[Cog]

Do you have any understanding of how much prepatory work goes into conducting the controlled demolition of a building? In a practical sense, you have to gut the building to expose the support columns. There is zero evidence such work was ever done on any of the WTC buildings.