Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Prof. Kenneth Deffeyes Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby MicroHydro » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 20:16:53

Sweet light peaked in Spring 2004, the Saudis covered it up by mixing more heavy sour into their export oil.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby ShawnAvery » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 20:28:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Badger', '2')008 will probably show the planet peaked back in 2000 but its the tech and fudged numbers that will come under scrutinity as time goes on.

Plus as stated the mega projects will also help to fudge the numbers some more...remember ENRON they kept there game going quite a while.

corporations are masters at bullshitting with many talking heads...


i think that is 100% correct. i am thinking peak has already happened, but the numbers have been glossed over a little bit. ghawar has a lot of water cut now and there is ALREADY a lot of alarm within countries as major fields go into decline.

peak oil isn't a matter of the peak actually happening. it's a matter of oil producers not being able to cover up declining production. in case you haven't noticed, oil prices have been going up up up..

it's only a matter of time before people realise 'hey.. production is going down! that means we must have peaked!!'
"It's a lot easier to get someone who's never been burnt to jump in the fire.." -me
User avatar
ShawnAvery
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: arizona

Unread postby Daculling » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 21:36:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('linlithgowoil', 'i') dont think we'll peak until another couple of years - going by the megaprojects update. there is too many projects coming online for us to peak now. we'd peak now if ghawar collapsed, but not in any other case.

i still say end 2007 to mid 2008 is the peak.


Seems to me, if all they can offer in excess is the heavy crude... it already has. I don't trust them... they don't trust us... we'll know in a couple years.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby cube » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 21:58:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MicroHydro', 'S')weet light peaked in Spring 2004, the Saudis covered it up by mixing more heavy sour into their export oil.
Is that like when the bartender adds a little bit of water into the drinks hoping that nobody notices? :roll:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby savethehumans » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 00:02:25

Good analogy, cube! :-D

Yeah, oil (especially the "sweet" kind) HAS peaked. This emphasis on the date is distracting us from the really important thing: preparing/adjusting to the realities of a post-peak world.

Sheeple (and us, too!) really, really, REALLY can't conceive of how bad things are gonna be, and how fast they will get there. . .they (and we) have NO frame of reference for something as bad as post-peak collapse. Not the Depression, not WWII, not ANYTHING!

Thus, it is easier to have chats over coffee (or lunch) over a date. A date is something that is graspable. The aftermath of the date is not. 8O
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: How is Deffeyes' stats holding up? Should he be sweating

Unread postby shady28 » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 04:25:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cynus', 'I')t's only 126 days until Deffeyes' predicted date. I didn't read his book, but I was wondering if anyone can say if his numbers are still on target, or have they already been proved wrong?


I think the following quote from "Hubbert's Peak : The Impending World Oil Shortage" (2001 ed) is what you're referring to. However, he disavois this as an absolute - it is simply the result of his math. The only year he pins himself on here is 2009 - he says the peak will happen before 2009. If that prediction fails, then I'd say he is discredited.

Ch 8 pg 158
"The mathematical peak falls at the year 2004.7; call it 2005. However, I'm not betting the farm that the actual year is 2005 and not 2003 or 2006... There is nothing plausible that could postpone the peak until 2009. Get used to it."


The bulk of his writing is focused on the years 2004 - 2008 as being the range for a likely peak. Basically, he is saying it can happen anytime in that range.
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: How is Deffeyes' stats holding up? Should he be sweating

Unread postby Jdelagado » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 11:58:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cynus', 'I')t's only 126 days until Deffeyes' predicted date. I didn't read his book, but I was wondering if anyone can say if his numbers are still on target, or have they already been proved wrong?



Deffeye's won't be eating turkey for Thanksgiving; he'll be EATING CROW!

jdelagado
User avatar
Jdelagado
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Phoenix
Top

Re: How is Deffeyes' stats holding up? Should he be sweating

Unread postby Doly » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 12:02:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jdelagado', '
')Deffeye's won't be eating turkey for Thanksgiving; he'll be EATING CROW!


Crow? What the hell does that mean?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby Leanan » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 12:21:43

I think the key will be depletion rates. There will be big projects coming online by 2008. The question is, can they make up for the depletion of the aging giants? Deffeyes seems to think they can't.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby BrownDog » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 13:02:42

I think this illustrates a major misunderstanding of the issue, to try to say that a singular date can be predicted. I don't think that Deffeyes or Hubbert [not Hubbell] for that matter were trying to make claims about a single point being the key issue of Peak Oil, or even that it could be predicted. It is more about the idea that production will grow, generally, but for various reasons will eventually not be able to keep up with demand and begin to decline.

Emphasizing a single date seems to be a straw man argument to discredit the whole idea based on a rather insignificant singular date. By that I mean that people say "peak oil has been predicted and been incorrect before", which is true. But that doesn't show that peak oil will not occur, it only shows that accurate data is hard to come by. Focusing on the date is, to me, missing the point.

[edited to fix result of leaky brain pan]
Last edited by BrownDog on Mon 01 Aug 2005, 14:01:58, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BrownDog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: N. TX

Re: How is Deffeyes' stats holding up? Should he be sweating

Unread postby BrownDog » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 13:04:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jdelagado', '
')Deffeye's won't be eating turkey for Thanksgiving; he'll be EATING CROW!


Crow? What the hell does that mean?

I'll assume this is a cultural clarification thing: "eating crow" is a euphemism for admitting that you're wrong.
User avatar
BrownDog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: N. TX
Top

Unread postby Leanan » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 13:39:02

I doubt Deffeyes will eating crow on Thanksgiving. Even if he's wrong, no one will know it until well after Turkey Day.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: How is Deffeyes' stats holding up? Should he be sweating

Unread postby Daculling » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:35:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BrownDog', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jdelagado', '
')Deffeye's won't be eating turkey for Thanksgiving; he'll be EATING CROW!


Crow? What the hell does that mean?

I'll assume this is a cultural clarification thing: "eating crow" is a euphemism for admitting that you're wrong.


An expression describing the anguish you must go through when coming out and admitting one of your own mistakes.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Jdelagado » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 22:41:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') doubt Deffeyes will eating crow on Thanksgiving. Even if he's wrong, no one will know it until well after Turkey Day.


Yeah, I was just kidding around. I have the UPMOST respect for these Geologists- Deffeyes, Hubbert, and Campbell.

It's the CRACKPOTS I have a problem with like ruppert and savinar. They give the reality of Geology a bad name....

jdelagado
User avatar
Jdelagado
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Phoenix
Top

Unread postby ubercrap » Sat 23 Jul 2005, 13:41:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BrownDog', 'I') think this illustrates a major misunderstanding of the issue, to try to say that a singular date can be predicted. I don't think that Deffeyes or Hubbell for that matter were trying to make claims about a single point being the key issue of Peak Oil, or even that it could be predicted. It is more about the idea that production will grow, generally, but for various reasons will eventually not be able to keep up with demand and begin to decline.

Emphasizing a single date seems to be a straw man argument to discredit the whole idea based on a rather insignificant singular date. By that I mean that people say "peak oil has been predicted and been incorrect before", which is true. But that doesn't show that peak oil will not occur, it only shows that accurate data is hard to come by. Focusing on the date is, to me, missing the point.


Marion King Hubbert is the geologist you are thinking of, Edwin Hubble was an astronomer.
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby seahorse » Sat 23 Jul 2005, 14:00:51

jdelagado,

I think the April 2005 EIA report estimating world oil production exceeding world oil demand in the 4th quarter of this year gives Deffeyes PO prediction a little outside credibility. By saying he will eat crow, before we know, leaves you in vulnerable to eat crow. I don't know, but the inherent risk of predicting anything, whether its PO or someone eating crow, means the predictor will be a hero or eat crow. Better just wait and see, Thanksgivings not that far off.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Unread postby Jdelagado » Sat 23 Jul 2005, 19:24:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'j')delagado,

I think the April 2005 EIA report estimating world oil production exceeding world oil demand in the 4th quarter of this year gives Deffeyes PO prediction a little outside credibility. By saying he will eat crow, before we know, leaves you in vulnerable to eat crow. I don't know, but the inherent risk of predicting anything, whether its PO or someone eating crow, means the predictor will be a hero or eat crow. Better just wait and see, Thanksgivings not that far off.



Yes, sir- I will eat crow and apologize to everyone on this forum if Deffeyes is correct....

jdelegado
User avatar
Jdelagado
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Phoenix
Top

Unread postby Ardalla » Sat 23 Jul 2005, 20:09:21

Heh, talking about the obscurity of 'eating crow', I was talking at work yesterday about Steve McQueen and Natalie Woods, and a woman said "Who is that?". The woman was 55 years old. I finally found someone she had heard of: John Wayne. People live in very different worlds.
User avatar
Ardalla
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun 23 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia

Unread postby jdmartin » Sun 24 Jul 2005, 02:51:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ardalla', 'D')effeyes should not have made that prediction. The media does not have a sense of humor. If it doesn't pan out people will be asking why they should take him seriously anymore when he was wrong about the peak date. Remember Dukakis and the tank? Teddy and the bridge? Gary Hart and the girl on his lap photo?

Well, I never did think Gore was wooden. Seemed pretty animated to me.


I met Al Gore, and the guy had a good sense of humor. It's too bad it didn't come out when he was in front of the camera. He just wasn't as good at posturing as Clinton, but I bet he would have been a better president.
After fueling up their cars, Twyman says they bowed their heads and asked God for cheaper gas.There was no immediate answer, but he says other motorists joined in and the service station owner didn't run them off.
User avatar
jdmartin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Merry Ol' USA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron