[asg70]

Sad to see him straining so hard to stay relevant.

He's only preaching to the converted at this point, which is a very small clique these days.

[onlooker]

You guys conveniently skipped over his correctly dismal assessment of Shale/fracking and thus future prospects for the Oil Industry.
But of course you think he is a quack. So why you bother posting anything from him beats me

[asg70]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '
')...correctly dismal assessment of Shale/fracking

[Darian S]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('asg70', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '
')...correctly dismal assessment of Shale/fracking

[onlooker]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Darian S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('asg70', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '
')...correctly dismal assessment of Shale/fracking

[Darian S]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')es and he also means the dismal economics from day 1 to the present of the entire endeavor

[AdamB]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')In Part 1 of this essay we surveyed the historical, economic, and cultural context for the upset victory of Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. I did not mention Russian interference in that election. That’s because it is a subject that deserves to be treated on its own. It is, of course, a source of heated controversy: leaders of the national security agencies and the FBI are unanimous in saying that Russia made a concerted effort to impact the election, while denial that such interference took place has emanated from the White House, Fox News, and some Republicans in Congress. The latter’s motivation is fairly transparent: questioning the legitimacy of the election shines an unfavorable light on the Trump administration and the Republican Party. Interestingly, however, voices on the far left have likewise argued that the Mueller investigation is

[RepublicanfromEngland]

https://richardheinberg.com/museletter- ... -for-gen-z

so yes. I think a good many remain sceptical on this subject, I can't help but see how old so many threads are on this old forum now.

[AdamB]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RepublicanfromEngland', 'h')ttps://richardheinberg.com/museletter-390-peak-oil-for-gen-z

[RepublicanfromEngland]

He like others jumped on the bandwagon got caught up in the subject of crude oil depletion, but he has said that the energy crisis was imminent, but not that imminent, that is is over decades but the solution to change must happen before the major point of peak. I recently got an email response from him, I sent a year or more ago now, it got lost, some sort of technical glitch.

I just type away stating that, there is no guarantee that anything that he or anybody has expressed on the energy subject could happen. For example the recent conflict in Eastern Europe, there is no certainty. I did read a few books on the subject when this subject was still in the media here and there. One was his The Party's over, and another was the Last oil shock, written by a BBC journalist who onced worked on the Money programme via that news corporation.

Mr Heinberg knows his stuff, and it is consistent, but the timing and the numbers is the controversy, always has been.