by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 11 Mar 2018, 14:09:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')he patient in many cases still determines the outcome. I had a conversation with my doctor about obesity. I asked her why instead of just telling a patient to lose weight to moderate high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and Type 2 diabetes, that the doctors instead prescribed pills for each one of those disorders.
She replied that she did indeed recommend weight loss but the patients seemed never to get to that point to do so. So what are doctors left with? To prescribe pills that moderate all of the things that arise from simply being overweight. Losing weight is difficult while taking a pill is not. If you choose to live in a unhealthy way its not like a doctor can force you to do otherwise. I fully realize that for some, they have to take meds for those conditions described above, but for a lot of people its their lifestyle that dictates it.
This is an excellent point, and the doctors then often (at least anecdotally, by the public) get the blame when the obese and morbidly obese populations, completely predictably, have statistically bad health outcomes when they age.
I've had a brief discussion about this with a couple doctors when they recommended we not do anything about condition X, and then the doctor acted a bit surprised when I voiced no objection.
One conversation was about how a huge proportion of people "want a pill, even for a cold", even when the doctor explains how in that case, a pill will do nothing, and the side effects are net detrimental. The patients wanting to "get something" more than medical advice for the cost/time of their visit, and the doctors needing to earn a living and not wanting to anger many of their patients were both mentioned.
The other conversation was about how many patients didn't like the "watchful waiting" method of dealing with MANY things that happen to people as they age, even though cost and medical procedure risk issues often make that the most prudent and effective strategy.
As tired as I used to get from having to explain to idiotic management with the math sense of a third grader why their intuitive perception of some database operation was "fast" was dead wrong in the real world (couching it in language that wouldn't get me fired) -- I can only imagine how doctors, having passed medical school and all the hurdles to become a doctor AND practiced medicine AND received updates to their education, must get having to waste lots of time trying to do things like try to talk people out of prescriptions for antibiotics that they don't need AND contribute to antibiotic resistant disease strains.
IMO, for those doctors who hang in there and do the job largely because they like helping people, they get a lot more points for "sainthood" than people who grow prosperous from the popularity of various mainstream religions, and doing what is popular with the parishioners.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.