by ralfy » Sat 06 Jan 2018, 22:50:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')I have repeatedly denounced the ETP thermodynamics mumbo jumbo for the farce that it is.
Depletion on the other hand will happen but will force us to maneuver not limit us. The energy industry will make as much money on the down side of the curve as they did going up and perhaps quite a bit more even in inflation adjusted dollars. Net energy shortfalls? Shortfall from what line. At present we waste a lot of oil because it is plentiful and cheap (relatively) and the first thing we will do is stop wasting it for things like central heating. The general economy will of course undergo changes but it is always changing anyway so this will just be the newest change it has to adapt to. There will be a lot of opportunities for those that seek and find substitutes and new more efficient methods and these new activities will balance out those employed now by wasting cheap oil.
FWIW, such models are based on the reality of depletion.
The energy industry, like the rest, can only make more money given cheap energy. With depletion, there is no such thing.
Oil is not plentiful and cheap given production costs.
There are no substitutes, especially given the point that what affects oil also affects other material resources.
Obviously, the world economy will undergo changes, but likely not in the way you imagine. The reason is simple: it's a capitalist system, which means it relies on cheap energy to keep lots of credit propped up to supply the same plus goods to growing middle classes worldwide. Without that cheap energy, the system starts weakening, but we don't notice it because performance is measured using the same credit that's easily created.
In the end, in order for that change to take place while maintaining the same maintain, we will need
ecological footprint to rise on average worldwide. That will require at least one more earth.
Of course, that's assuming that the world population does not increase further.