by Plantagenet » Tue 26 Dec 2017, 15:52:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')magine a swimming pool size of shale that has high porosities which allows for lots of storage of oil that has been generated in-situ but with nano-darcies of permeability (that's 10*9 smaller than most conventional reservoirs). You hammer on the rock with a big sledge and create a big fracture across the width of the pool with a bunch of subsidiary fractures that fan out for a metre or so around the large fracture. What that does is it allows all of the oil which has direct access to the big fracture (via smaller fractures or microcracks) to be extracted. Yet the vast majority of that swimming pool of rock is untouched. So in the case of shales or marls the issue is that there needs to be more of the reservoir intersected where permeability can be increased. The technology is different and the economics are different.
Yup.
One way they are doing this is by stacking wells, so multiple wells are drilled one right on top of the next to create a dense array of fractures.
But because the "sweet spots" get drilled out first, as time goes on the remaining shale/marl contains less oil and is generally less productive, creating an inexorable problem for TOS oilcos. This makes it harder and harder to increase or even maintain oil production over time at TOS plays.
You can see this working out in the Bakken where production reached a peak in 2015, and has declined significantly since then.
Cheers!