by Newfie » Sun 24 Dec 2017, 10:58:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'N')o, the purpose of government is not to redistribute wealth no matter what you have been told by the social justice warriors. The purpose of the government is to protect my rights. Those inalienable rights being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. All else it does is an infringement on those rights in some way or the other.
Leave the jingoism in the schoolyard. Let's keep this an intelligent discussion of ideas.
The purpose of government is NOT to protect your RIGHTS beyond the right to live. That is undeniably true for the vast majority of governments that ever existed, perhaps all. It is your desire and wish that that be true, but the physical implementation is different. At best you are speaking of THIS (USA) government, but I can cite innumerable cases where the rights of citizens you propose have been and continue to be trampled. But all of this is a divergence from the topic.
But, for sake of argument, let's assume you are correct,mow does that refute my argument? How are "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" attainable without a means of income? And if the government can not assure you a culture with adequate work (let alone meaningful or fulfilling work) they are not protecting these RIGHTS.
On a more fundamental basis the government needs to provide the means to sustain life. If it can not do that then it must resort to extreme measures (Soviet Russia/China) to remain in control. Or loose control, French Revolution.
So demagoguery aside, governments need to find some way to feed the masses, to sustain their lives. And that, in our particular culture, requires wealth distribution.