[M_B_S]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Squilliam', 'W')e (life) gives meaning to the sun? Without life then the sun shining for billions of years would be meaningless.

[M_B_S]

http://www.ktvn.com/story/31260413/13-y ... ing-device



E²=(pC)²+(mC²)²


"Making power for free" Tesla

Thats realy AC=>DC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ1Mz7kGVf0


M_B_S

[M_B_S]

To proof Wittgenstein you just look @ Teslar and Musk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkWDdNkM9Bc

Elon Musk Incredible Speech - Motivational video

M_B_S

[M_B_S]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMjLfkSzMCM

This week on Act Out!, the danger of absolutist thinking in a fluid and dynamic reality

Summa cum laude!

M_B_S

[dolanbaker]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'I')f you think your wife will believe you were out all night saving souls for Jesus, you have another think coming.

[EnergyUnlimited]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('M_B_S', '
')
Reality is the sum of all facts = natural laws so the world.

Theorem You could not have something without having nothing <=> Proof : 0=0 => 1+0=1

[M_B_S]

@EnergyUnlimited

wrote "There is only one possible being, eg Universe."

Konrad Suse said the Universe is (one) super computer!



Zuse, K. "The Computing Universe", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 21, Nos. 6/7 (1982), page 589-600, Plenum Press 1982.
***********
Exkurs
Interesting the G number is odd so it can be written as a sum of consecutive numbers in N and as a difference of two square numbers.

=> G= kn +(n²-n)/2 = x²-y² = (x+y)(x-y)

where n is the number of consecutive numbers and odd faktor if n>2 in N of the sum G and k is the starting number and (x-y)(x+y) are factors, if G is a prime (x-y)=1 =>G=(x+y) and G=k+k+1=(x+y)
Maybe this helps...
M_B_S

[EnergyUnlimited]

No it doesn't help at all.
Even if someone have said that "Universe is supercomputer", it doesn't mean that it is actually a case.
A lot of silliness have after all been said but by no means proven.
You gave an example of such a thing.
Other examples are Multiverse, String theories, cosmic inflation era, singularities inside BH and many similar concepts.
So I do not say that Universe is definitely not a supercomputer, but such claim is rather extraordinary and a burden of proof is sqarely on the claimant.

And even if it *is* supercomputer, the area within our cosmic horizon would be far too small to even *represent*, let alone factorize Graham's number.
Obviously it is of no use to consider any parts outside of our cosmic horizon as any communication with such areas would need to be FTL, hence impossible (yet another impossibility btw).
So returning to the area within our cosmic horizon (approx. 91 billions of light years across).
Assuming that we divided this volume in Planck volumes, which are the smallest possible voulmes, the resulting number would be just a very very tiny comparing to Graham number. Actually negligably small.
So if you cannot even represent, forget about computing.

We go into certain philosophical conundrum dealing with a *fact* that an *abstract* world is unbelivably vast, actually infinite but a physical one is an extremely restricted by laws of Nature.
Hence most of possibilities are unattainable in physical world, even if theoretically possible in an abstract one.
You may also find out that even in abstract world, which is arbitrary vast there are defined concepts which are entirely undecidable (and actually proven to be undecidable).
You may research for example issues related to *halting problem* and so called *busy beaver function* associated with it.

[M_B_S]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'N')o it doesn't help at all.
Even if someone have said that "Universe is supercomputer", it doesn't mean that it is actually a case.
A lot of silliness have after all been said but by no means proven.
You gave an example of such a thing.
Other examples are Multiverse, String theories, cosmic inflation era, singularities inside BH and many similar concepts.
So I do not say that Universe is definitely not a supercomputer, but such claim is rather extraordinary and a burden of proof is sqarely on the claimant.

And even if it *is* supercomputer, the area within our cosmic horizon would be far too small to even *represent*, let alone factorize Graham's number.
Obviously it is of no use to consider any parts outside of our cosmic horizon as any communication with such areas would need to be FTL, hence impossible (yet another impossibility btw).
So returning to the area within our cosmic horizon (approx. 91 billions of light years across).
Assuming that we divided this volume in Planck volumes, which are the smallest possible voulmes, the resulting number would be just a very very tiny comparing to Graham number. Actually negligably small.
So if you cannot even represent, forget about computing.

We go into certain philosophical conundrum dealing with a *fact* that an *abstract* world is unbelivably vast, actually infinite but a physical one is an extremely restricted by laws of Nature.
Hence most of possibilities are unattainable in physical world, even if theoretically possible in an abstract one.
You may also find out that even in abstract world, which is arbitrary vast there are defined concepts which are entirely undecidable (and actually proven to be undecidable).
You may research for example issues related to *halting problem* and so called *busy beaver function* associated with it.

[EnergyUnlimited]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('M_B_S', '
')Now we cracked our binary code and will soon be able to upload us on other platforms or upload a "code" into our brain.
M_B_S

[M_B_S]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('M_B_S', '
')Now we cracked our binary code and will soon be able to upload us on other platforms or upload a "code" into our brain.
M_B_S

[EnergyUnlimited]

Even if brain does work as a sort of quantum computer, it is quite likely that identical input run several times would give considerable different outputs.
That due to probabilistic nature of events taking place at the point of decoherrence of quantum systems.
Such events would leave output of brain largerly unpredictabe and could prove to be insurmountable obstacle in emulation attempts by digital systems.
Yet that is possibly a mechanism delivering *creativity*, as yet impossible task for computers.

[M_B_S]

Is our Universe a quantum computer simulating life on earth <=> human brains ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlTKTTt47WE

Is Reality Real? The Simulation Argument

WOW!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d9i_0Ty7Cg

Thesis => Is light speed C the maximum speed our "universe computer"<=> "Rechenender Raum" is calculating

M_B_S

[M_B_S]

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/5136 ... -implants/
behind the robot show just how hard it is to get along with people.


Memory Implants
A maverick neuroscientist believes he has deciphered the code by which the brain forms long-term memories......

M_B_S

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/6090 ... xt-song/zu

“We decode realistic synthetic birdsong directly from neural activity,” the scientists announced in a new report published on the website bioRxiv. The team, which includes Argentinian birdsong expert Ezequiel Arneodo, calls the system the first prototype of “a decoder of complex, natural communication signals from neural activity.” A similar approach could fuel advances towards a human thought-to-text interface, the researchers say.

[M_B_S]

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists- ... ally-exist

It is thinkable we are existing in a computer simulation.
=> Rechnender Raum

But what is with the spin of the universe?
Twisting photons to matter and matter to photons in black holes?

https://www.livescience.com/15063-antim ... nning.html

[M_B_S]

When German "Astronaut" Commander Alexander Gerst is in command of the ISS he will be assist by a German made KI Robot :CIMON
=>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnpJI3WeiBg
=>

"Captain Future" with CIMON in Space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBwdjahzd-U

=> All thinkable is possible


M_B_S

[M_B_S]

https://seekingalpha.com/article/421188 ... on-failing



Tesla shares popped after the electric vehicle automaker reported a surprise third-quarter profit on Wednesday.

Tesla shares rose more than 10 percent in premarket trading as analysts put out bullish notes to investors on what CEO Elon Musk called an "incredibly historic quarter" for the company....
***************
Tesla saves the day...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ1Mz7kGVf0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDWYj7RzuvA

Tesla <=> Musk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKWPdJWuBQ

PEAK OIL!