by tita » Wed 20 Sep 2017, 08:33:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'B')ut given the top 3 (the KSA, USA and Russia) are all within about 10% of each other the ranking doesn't seem too important IMHO. For instance while the KSA produces more oil then the US we supply the world with more consumable fossil fuel products then any other country. No one in Europe or S. America burns KSA oil in their cars. But they burn a lot of motor fuel produced by US refineries.
Also, US produce currently 9.2 mb/d of crude oil... KSA 10mb/d, and russia 10.32 mb/d
But when you add biofuels, NGLs and other liquids (all accounted in the world oil supply figure), you end up with 14.256 mb/d. Which put US in the first place, followed by KSA and russia.
When you take out NGLs (and still include biofuels and other liquids), it's 10.54mb/d, which is probably the figure used in the ranking provided in your second link.
So, I also don't think that these rankings are much important. What is impressive is the growth of FF supply in the US between 2008 and 2015, while KSA and russia output was quite stable.
The global supply will have to increase in 2018, unlike last 3 years when it stagnated... And quite a lot of this increase is expected to come from the US (0.84 mb/d according to OPEC). Which raise the question about the actual capacity of the US to increase output with current prices. Despite much talk about LTO back on drilling, the production hasn't grew yet as much as expected. Probably because rig count is still half of what it was in 2014...
Of course, OPEC may have the spare capacity if the price goes up... But why use it? Most of his members will be happy getting higher revenue with the same output.
Anyway, if price change in 2018, this will support the LTO and restrain demand, which will end up in some balance somewhere....