Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 13 Jun 2017, 17:24:32

Hard to say but an intriguing question. I'd kinda like to try it out.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby onlooker » Wed 14 Jun 2017, 11:04:01

Well, I think we should all recognize that the Internet is an incredible source of information. Throughout history much of the human population has NOT had access too much information on many subjects. With the Net, we can find out so much, so easily about so many things. Anything than may be important to a particular person. Health, Money matters, relationship info, etc etc. So I think that while we can certainly become addicted and waylaid on the Net, we can also educatate ourselves and enrich our understandings of the human condition and gain the perspective of many types of people from many areas, comprising many types of cultures and ways of thinking.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby DesuMaiden » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 16:25:43

I am not sure if anyone else in this thread has mentioned this, but with the computerization of everything, this means privacy virtually disappears in the cyberspace world. If you've even got the faintest understanding of what Edward Snowden and many other whistleblowers have been saying for the past couple of years, online anonymity is largely a myth. George Orwell's 1984 novel's Big Brother survellience state is already being enforced onto the citizens of the world. Now with governments trying to remove Net Neutrality, free speech is trying being compromised by the police state survellience grid the government is trying to enforce on all digital communications.

Of course, some people make the point that "what's wrong with having no privacy if you have nothiing to hide?". But that's like saying "what's wrong with having no free speech if you have nothing to say?". Free speech is absolutely fundamental to a just society, yet the criminal cabal in the government, big corporations and big banks want to undermine it for their own personal gain. Whoever controls all the information the citizens get to hear or see, controls all the thoughts and actions of the citizens. And the government wants to undermine free speech, so they can have a complete monopoly on all of the information we see or hear. Thereby controlling the citizen's thoughts and actions.

Our governments have us under 100% survellience online. There is nothing you do online that is truly anonymous in summary. If TPTB want to find your real identity online, they can easily do so.
History repeats itself. Just everytime with different characters and players.
DesuMaiden
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 888
Joined: Mon 06 Oct 2014, 16:00:31

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby onlooker » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 16:33:13

While I agree with what you're saying Desu, I have been pretty unrestrained in saying some pretty damning and outrageous things about the US where I currently live. Case in point that I believe the US was complicit in 911. Nobody has come knocking on my door -so far haha
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Ibon » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 17:34:27

Cultivate a cyber presence that is sanitized for those who do the surveillance. Save your deepest darkest secrets for the analog world.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 18:11:30

The sad truth is that internet privacy disappeared about the turn of the century. We have all had online dossiers since then. Each release of Windows and Apple OS and Android and each version of browser software bares more of the user's soul to scrutiny. They know pretty much everything you buy, everything purchased with credit and bitcoin and every serialized banknote you handle, from the moment you get it from the ATM to whenever it is deposited by anybody else. Cash transactions within sight of an HD camera that can also see your face are not anonymous.

They know everything you have ever searched for, you preferred types of porn, your prescription medicines, how many STDs you have caught, what prescriptions you take for chronic illnesses, what books you check out from the Library, how much you spend on alcohol and what types, whether you give cash to known drug dealers, and whenever your serialized cash turns up in the possession of another, including corrupt cops and government officials. They know where you bank, and the approximate balances in all your accounts, even in those countries that have promised you anonymity.

Get the picture? Your whole life is transparent, you have had zero privacy for years. If you carry a phone, they also know where it is 24x7, and thus where you are.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 20:45:08

I think of the cyber spy masters as hoarders. Hoarders have all kinds of junk they keep because something might be of value. Because they have so much junk they can't find anything, it makes them terribly inefficient. If you can't find it, or don't know how to use it, you might as well not have it.

They be effective you need to be agile and proficient. Does ANYONE here think those words, "agile and proficient", describe ANYONE in our government?

Sleep tight knowing a bunch of bureaucrat nerds are collecting tetra bytes of home made porn daily. All in the name of our safety.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 22:27:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'C')ultivate a cyber presence that is sanitized for those who do the surveillance. Save your deepest darkest secrets for the analog world.

IMO, it's not just the surveillance state that makes privacy important.

How about malware, identity theft (which malware Trojan Horses could help allow), actual risk to your online financial accounts (again, and now the malware is getting really scary).

Recently I've been messing with Windows XP because ... I LOVE GAMES, especially old classic games. (It may make me a big geek, but at least playing games doesn't hurt anything aside from consuming a bit of electricty).

And, as I was researching how to get XP and games working on a modern PC, via virtualization technology like VirtualBox, I watched various tutorial videos on Youtube, and chased down a lot of shady references/recommendations (that superficially could have been benign). And it dawned on me that:

1). A HUGE proportion of people out there don't want to pay for a legit Windows license, and are willing to steal it. Even if this means having to risk all sorts of nasty malware exposure. And remember -- with no updates from MS for the ordinary user and few companies supporting it much as far as anti-virus, etc., that's EXTRAORDINARILY dangerous for the folks that have to be connected to the internet all the time.

2). IMO, after chasing down some things, MANY of the "helpful" people doing tutorials about how to illegally install Windows software (via downloading dangerous tools to help them steal it, etc) are just massively distributing malware. Just blatantly. Oh, and it's easy to pick up a perfectly legal, new OEM Windows XP on EBAY for under 30 bucks. I just installed one today. They buy them in quantity when PC distributors leave the business. The only drawback is one installation per physical machine. (Not sure how enforcable that will be with virtualization, especially if Windows XP licenses get rare.)

3). Well, people can have fun with that. I'll pass. I will ONLY run XP on a virtual machine with networking completely disabled, or on a physical PC where I have stopped any connection with WIFI, etc. Period. (You can get lots of 10ish year old PC's with XP, many refurbished by quality vendors CHEAP (like under $100 bucks, or under $200 if you want something fancy, a long warranty, and lots of hand-holding) off of places like EBAY, or even Amazon marketplace, if you don't want to fiddle with software virtualization or don't like all the tweaking you have to do to make it work well.
...

I saw so much bad stuff in less than a week that I got an idea for a science fiction story. "Skynet" or something of that ilk doesn't have to be death-dealing robots. It can be just massive malware distribution, set up on a subtle time bomb and buried deeply in free and cheap executables that we "just have to have". And "give" them to the masses, and chuckle and wait.

It waits and watches and then when the time is right, BAM -- 90% plus of critical computers in places like hospitals, various businesses, peoples' homes, the utilities, the government and on and on, quit working. And when the competent IT staff recovers them, BAM -- due to the date, or various switches turned by other malware, or whatever -- they just mess up AGAIN, because the malware is spread pervasively along many channels, for a long time. Almost no one is safe. The sheep have done it to themselves.

And once it sees the malware is working well, then a cascade of other malware, taking down financial markets, messing up transportation, and on and on keep falling like dominos. And then the sheep totally panic and destroy the system themselves. Like the "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street" Twilight Zone episode, except this time the problems are real and highly pervasive, and the hits just keep on coming.

Doomer porn for sure. This is just fiction of course -- but with the way young (and older ignorant) people behave with computers, our society is just ASKING for big trouble at some point. Don't like Skynet? How about terrorists in their cells or just unhappy geeks doing this while they spend their time in social isolation?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby asg70 » Thu 29 Jun 2017, 23:43:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'W')hile I agree with what you're saying Desu, I have been pretty unrestrained in saying some pretty damning and outrageous things about the US where I currently live. Case in point that I believe the US was complicit in 911. Nobody has come knocking on my door -so far haha


Considering how nutjobs like Alex Jones still walks among us, we're a pretty damn free society after all.

BOLD PREDICTIONS
-Billions are on the verge of starvation as the lockdown continues. (yoshua, 5/20/20)

HALL OF SHAME:
-Short welched on a bet and should be shunned.
-Frequent-flyers should not cry crocodile-tears over climate-change.
asg70
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sun 05 Feb 2017, 14:17:28

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 00:08:34

Folks, Microsoft ended support for Windows XP on 4/8/14. NOBODY should be doing anything online with an XP machine. The various antiviral products can only provide so much protection. None of the security vulnerabilities in the XP kernel code have been fixed for over two years. If you can't update to at least Windows 7 on that hardware, it's time to buy a new computer. Cut and pasted from MS "Windows lifecycle Fact Sheet":

Client operating systems, Latest update or service pack, End of mainstream support, End of extended support
Windows Vista, Service Pack 2, April 10, 2012, April 11, 2017,
Windows 7 *, Service Pack 1, January 13, 2015, January 14, 2020,
Windows 8,  Windows 8.1, January 9, 2018, January 10, 2023,
Windows 10 **, Version 1703, October 13, 2020, October 14, 2025

Vista is no longer usable, and is vulnerable to hackers without MS patching, as well.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 02:51:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'F')olks, Microsoft ended support for Windows XP on 4/8/14. NOBODY should be doing anything online with an XP machine. The various antiviral products can only provide so much protection. None of the security vulnerabilities in the XP kernel code have been fixed for over two years. If you can't update to at least Windows 7 on that hardware, it's time to buy a new computer. Cut and pasted from MS "Windows lifecycle Fact Sheet":

Client operating systems, Latest update or service pack, End of mainstream support, End of extended support
Windows Vista, Service Pack 2, April 10, 2012, April 11, 2017,
Windows 7 *, Service Pack 1, January 13, 2015, January 14, 2020,
Windows 8,  Windows 8.1, January 9, 2018, January 10, 2023,
Windows 10 **, Version 1703, October 13, 2020, October 14, 2025

Vista is no longer usable, and is vulnerable to hackers without MS patching, as well.

Absolutely right. But that doesn't stop people in the real world.

A good friend of mine who is a very stubborn 73 year old, loves his old XP desktop and is still running it after like 15 years. And it keeps on chugging as he isn't on it for long periods of time.

Now, all he really does is fiddle around on the web and with email, etc.

But can I talk him into going with a Chromebook since he hates Microsoft? No.

Can I talk him into going with Windows 7 (five years or so ago) so he's not at risk of major malware attacks? No.

Does he run even a good anti-virus? No, because Norton pestered him about renewing one day (and you'd think they'd burned down his home the way he rants about it).

I can only imagine millions of folks in a similar boat, because they don't want to change or new PC's cost money, or whatever.

...

He's one of the reasons I was looking into old Win XP machines. If the inevitable happens and his machine crashes and burns, at least it can be replaced. He does at least back up his data to memory sticks now and again.

Now that I've learned I can reliably clone entire SATA hard drives from XP and later, at least I can back up his whole machine once in a while. (When my PC main died a month or so ago, I did some research. My lazy butt gets forced into that every 5 to seven years for such an occurrence. LOL)
....

Actually, as much as I hate Windows 10 spyware, I might go with something like a Chromebook, and XP machines (kept the hell away from any sign of the internet.) Since I don't like most modern games, seems the best of both worlds for me.

After all, one can only imagine what will come AFTER Windows 10. Do they just swing by and rape and pillage your family every month, or will the constant spying be enough for them? And don't even talk to me about these "365" products. The LAST thing I want is to keep paying Microsoft, month after month, for using their buggy software.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 15:31:34

Yup, I've got an XP laptop I use for navigation. I also have a ubuntu partition with separate navsoftware and a freeware suite.

I broke down and bought a W10 machine for connected stuff. But now I have to spend hundreds more to replace various programs.

Very frustrating.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 15:42:59

As to the topic I have been very much against the trend to use Ethernet devices for internal command networks such as train control systems. Many transit agencies had Sonet systems that worked well and were efficient. But the have mostly been replaced with IP networks. The newer command devices are increasingly IP native. IMHO this is a stupid move.

I can see IP has its advantages when you are buying bandwidth, but those quickly fade when you have your own secure dedicated fiber.

What I and others have observed is that the IT departments have increasing power within the "corporate" world of the agencies. Even when Engineering departments try to buck the IP wave they are usually defeated. The IT "engineers" mostly are really just Cisco accolades. They make a lot of promises but really can't deliver. I've seen various projects in trouble because the IP environment just can't meet the requirements for security and redundancy and response. The old systems, sometimes wireline, worked just fine. Then we end up with layers of customization and having systems locked to vendor specific products.

But I'm a Dino and my voice falls on deaf ears. But the heart cringe.

Thus we get a statewide agency that REAUIRES its speakers to be POE and individually addressable off their network. The speaker costs $150, the Cisco IP/analog POE POS costs $1,500 and you need many more of them because they are power limited.

I was at a meeting with an agencies 80 year old chief engineer, a EE by trade and still sharp. The IT "gentleman" insisted that PA speakers would not work on a audio signal over an IP connection. "What are you going to do when analog speakers become obsolete!" The engineer just looked at one another, and he concluded the meeting. That argument went to the General Manager and all audio services were transferred to the idiot.

I could go on and on and on.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 15:46:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'Y')up, I've got an XP laptop I use for navigation. I also have a ubuntu partition with separate navsoftware and a freeware suite.

I broke down and bought a W10 machine for connected stuff. But now I have to spend hundreds more to replace various programs.

Very frustrating.

Does the MS spyware nature of Win 10 concern you at all?

I know we can supposedly turn most of it off. (I did, but it was a pain, since then Win 10 would constantly whine and fuss about it, like an unfed house pet. It also ended up unstable and in a boot loop. Unlike Win 7, which has been very stable for me since 2009. I suspect the instability might be rooted in all the spyware, but am not sure).

So I know that to stay on the Windows train and be supported means to go to Win 10 at some point. But we don't have to like it. Given the spyware, as a matter of principle, I just may go to something else, despite a new set of problems like:

1). Nothing is perfect. Just exchanging problems for something else.
2). Learning curve.
3). Software replacement hassle and cost.
4). For those that care about lots of data/system backup like drive cloning (i.e. beyond just copying your documents to a memory stick or three), hardware replacement cost (beyond the PC), and more learning curve as well.

...

If computing weren't so "cool", and if I hadn't fallen in love with it at first exposure in 1976, and chosen it for a career -- I have to wonder how much of all this nonsense I'd put up with as a hobbyist.

I can't imagine putting up with all the risk, failures, wasted time, frustration, etc. for ANYTHING else. Like crappy American cars (as compared to the best Japanese brands, for example -- and it was MUCH worse in the 80's and 90's) -- no way was I going to fool with that, no matter what gadgetry or nice looking cars they might offer.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 15:52:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'A')s to the topic I have been very much against the trend to use Ethernet devices for internal command networks such as train control systems. Many transit agencies had Sonet systems that worked well and were efficient. But the have mostly been replaced with IP networks. The newer command devices are increasingly IP native. IMHO this is a stupid move.

I can see IP has its advantages when you are buying bandwidth, but those quickly fade when you have your own secure dedicated fiber.


Sorry. When it got to networking, I threw up my hands and just became a "user". Whether for the internet, or at work -- I never learned what goes on behind the curtain for networking. (Finite time, lack of interest, etc).

At least physically, data storage always made SENSE to me, even if I didn't like the way they would bridge technologies in the short run in PC's to save money, ending up with a kludge. But even then, that stuff tended to work and be fairly reliable, even if slower and hard to upgrade in the long run.

And at least, if people backed up their data, the occasional BAD glitch for data storage was more of an inconvenience than "Oh crap. This stuff doesn't work and now we're REALLY screwed all the way)." Of course for people that can't be bothered to back up their precious data -- well, Murphy will teach them about consequences in due time -- just no predicting when.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 16:03:24

F#ing MS and W10 sucks! Yeah it bothers me. I'm struggling trying to make my serial devices, like my Iridium phone, talk to W10.

They keep changing things just to change them. There are legacy users out there who are really hosed by their "advancements."

Many years ago there was a DOS based program called Frameworks. It had. Spreadsheet, database, word processor and a bit more. It was blazing fast on a 286 machine. It had really neat macro functionality. The word processing outlining was embedded in the same kind of structure as a db, outlining was dead simple and reliable.

It got killed off and I believe some of its developers were early participants in Windows.

The point is, before Windows I had a suite of applications that allowed me to do everything I needed for my projects, better than what I have now. From my viewpoint very little functionality has been gained, much security has been lost.

I don't do games. I don't do complex Photoshop. So there may be advantages I don't see. But most people just send email, photos on Facebook and watch porn.

I don't know where MS is going but it's not making me easy.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 16:10:51

Outcast,

You are not alone.

I sent a lot of time as a front line maint supervisor. If the trains didn't run I got yelled at.

When I started we had copper telephone wire. Good, an average guy can pick it up and handle it. You can make an analogy to a water pipe and the average guy gets it.

Then we had T-1 circuits. A digital core, but in the terminal block you still had 2 wires. To the average guy it was a lot like a telephone pair. Ditto Sonet.

Now you have IP which is a statistical mux combined with dynamic routing. The telephone analogy completely breaks down. The average guy can't grip it. So you end up with IT departments, who are populated by average guys. They don't really get it. I've spent enough time in meetings to hear the palaver and acronym alphabet to know they are frequently clueless. They end up outsourcing support to a vendor, but to do that they need IP connections across a firewall that opens them to hacking.

BAH!
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 16:13:43

BTW, I carry a sextant. Some day I'll learn how to use it. But I've got it.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Fri 30 Jun 2017, 16:30:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'B')TW, I carry a sextant. Some day I'll learn how to use it. But I've got it.


I knew a lot of folks (engineer types) who carried a slide rule through the 80's. They'd whip it out and check things if they were overly surprised by some math result they got from a calculator or program.

IMO, there is nothing wrong with old technology, especially when used to check on new technology -- at least until the new technology is TRULY proven "tried and true".
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron