Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Ibon » Sun 11 Jun 2017, 17:53:39

We are in a very remote location and our internet service is provided by a small company that set up a series of microwave towers in the valley and fortunately our ridge top has line of sight with one of the companies towers. For $58 a month we have fast internet service. In the beginning the connection was slow and I mentioned this to the provider and for a one time $ 350 hard ware investment one of their technicians climbed the tower and provided us a dedicated point to point transmitter... (try asking Verizon to do that!)

During the rainy season (now) we have occasional outages. Sometimes the reason is up here on our end, sometimes down in the valley. Anyway, I have been observing myself when the internet goes out. Within a couple hours I start to wonder if this will be a longer outage. If it lasts overnight I start wondering what important emails and Whatsapp messages am I missing. When it goes to two days I start to get anxiety that I am missing some guest inquiries or some important news out there, important family info, etc.

And then when the internet comes back up almost every time there is absolutely nothing important that I missed. And every damn time I ask myself why did I start getting this anxiety? It's never about missing some important content, it is about not knowing what it is you might be missing. It bothers me though, this digital thread that makes it up here and makes me feel dependent somehow, and every time this dependency is only shadows.

The internet has had this this insidious ability to hitchhike on top of this innate sense you have of belonging and when it is removed you have this weird feeling like you out of contact with your tribe. It's all not real though but it triggers this innate sense of belonging that then has the ability of eclipsing organic reality.

I enjoy this site for example and being able to share thoughts with folks all over the world many of whom have world views different than my own and different from most of our guests. This is valuable to me on some tribal level. That part I recognize.

Also that we could not do this project in such a remote location without the internet because of all the logistics required.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby onlooker » Sun 11 Jun 2017, 18:26:21

Seems Ibon, you have the best of both worlds. The natural organic "real" one and the cacophony of thoughts and concepts from many people deriving from this complex world we live in. Is it less real? Or do we simply recoil at times from the complexity, disturbing aspects , uncertainty and nonsense arriving to us from the Net/World. All of us to some degree are mesmerized by this world we live in and the Internet to it all. That can help explain why we alternate between wishing to go online and not
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Sun 11 Jun 2017, 19:05:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')It replaces everything you every knew or even comprehended. It's like the Borg with a pretty face :) Has cryogenic eyes. sweetness


It's a complete fantasy, it will not ever happen, and to even start, one would have to get all users everywhere to replace the networking layer software on all devices simultaneously. Even if one were to somehow magically reboot the whole net with a different architecture, the purchasing engines, the backbone machines that perform transactions, etc. etc. are all integrated into tthe existing network.

It's the equivalent of saying "Life would be sweetness and light without rich people." which in fact two idiots named Marx and Engels did once say. Another apt comparison would be "People would not get tired and their shoes would last longer if the Earth had the gravity of the moon."

It is complete foolishness, cannot be brought about and even if it were not, there is still a fatal flaw. The internet providers and backbone systems actually pay for the network, and also manage it. If you were to succeed in cutting out their revenues, there would not be a network.

Utter tripe.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Newfie » Sun 11 Jun 2017, 19:49:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'B')org.

Will it work in Hiva Oa? Better yet, half way there?

And NO, I will NOT be assimilated!

A bunch of these tiny remote island have telephone repeaters (satellite?) on them. I was invited to start a ecotourism project on Little Ragged Cay off Cuba.
Image
A selling point was free telephone and internet. I don't believe anything was built?


We just spent 3 months in the Bahamas. My Wife is still working until Christmas so she needed reliable phone service. Verizon now has a deal where you can connect via Bahamas Telephone Co for $10/ day. MUCH cheaper than previous options. Data $$$ not so bad but voice was killer. We didn't get that far down the islands, oyna whole lot there. Lots of abandoned tourist ideas where we did go.

Voice service was adequate, data connections were pretty bad to terrible. I don't think it's satellite but uwave links.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 05:13:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') know the fault-tolerant computer system you work on. It's great and its ancient. I'll bet you never even saw the microcomputer revolution coming? Otherwise you'd be just another Peter Gregory instead of a weird old systems guy retiring to his weird suburban doomstead up in the hills lol

And you know more than the techies and millennials at Wired?


You are as ignorant as you are arrogant. I studied microprocessors as an undergraduate in 1977. I was already familiar with two early PCs called the Altair and IMSAI while in high school, from a publication called Popular Electronics. Both ran early operating system software called CP/M. The original IBM PC went into production in 1981. I personally acquired an IBM AT clone in 1985, running MS/DOS before Windows 1.

FYI the Tandem operating system and fault tolerent application architecture live on today as the HP NonStop product line. They enable the entire world network, you interact with dozens of NonStop systems daily - every time you make an online purchase, send a text or IM, place a cell phone call, use a credit card, trades stocks or securities, buy gas or make a travel or lodging reservation. These ultimate "trusted systems" enable the web and in fact are the only computers that form the "database of record" about who has how much money and how they spend it.

The NonStop systems have slowly grown from the $8B/yr revenue point to $10B in 2016, they remain the most profitable part of HP, bar none. And FYI, you cannot do business or spend money over a network without trusted systems. If there is any problem, sales of NonStop systems are throttled by overall network growth - as online purchasing grows, so do NonStop sales.

You absolutely, positively cannot do such transactions on peer-to-peer computer networks. The database-of-record for everything resides in a NonStop system that sits quietly in a chilled room in a secret location. The business done on such systems pays for the world wide network, including all your online fantasies about peer-to-peer computing. What you are proposing is the equivalent of letting everyone bank online and allowing them to set their account balances to anything they want, in effect printing virtual money. Take a deep breath and hold it until that happens.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 05:59:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hese ultimate "trusted systems" enable the web and in fact are the only computers that form the "database of record" about who has how much money and how they spend it.

Which begs the question Kaiser can someone hack into these systems/servers to wipe out the accounts of the richest individuals/entities around the world?
Or perhaps an actual physical (terrorist) attack on the locations housing these systems/servers? It would certainly throw a monkey wrench into the world-wide financial system
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 11:19:24

There has never been a successful hack on a NonStop system, since I joined Tandem Computers in 1978. This is because you cannot have remote access to the operator interface unless the system administrator grants it. Most do not, basic security requires that you physically be on site with the appropriate passwords to effect system changes. The operator interface and customer applications and data are entirely seperate in most cases, few are willing to grant remote operations control. Even if you were to acquire knowledge of where the computer was located, electronic traffic between various systems in a network can be encrypted with strong encryption protocols. If one were to gain remote access to the administrator interface, you still could not see or alter the database of record. The system was archtected not to be vulnerable, and we sold audit services to make sure they remained that way.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby onlooker » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 11:26:37

Wow,thanks for that technical detailed reply K
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby yellowcanoe » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 12:01:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') know the fault-tolerant computer system you work on. It's great and its ancient. I'll bet you never even saw the microcomputer revolution coming?


I got into the IT field before personal computers became a viable option for average people instead of just hobbyists so my initial experience was on mainframe computers. While we could see the attraction of personal computers and understood that usage of them would continue to grow, what turned us off was that they were incredibly primitive compared to our mainframe systems. Of course, personal computers have improved immensely over time but to a large extent the personal computer industry reinvented ideas that had already been the norm in the mainframe world for decades.

The PC revolution did illustrate that if the goal is to mass produce inexpensive machines, it is more practical to evolve a cheap but inferior technology than to utilize a superior but more expensive technology. Thus instead of using SCSI disk technology which from the get-go provided better performance and larger disk capacity, PC's started off with IDE disk technology. It took many changes to the IDE standard to evolve it into the current SATA disk technology. I wonder if this is one of the reasons why it is so hard to grow the electric vehicle market -- we're building electric cars that are quite complex and expensive to build and hoping we can somehow scale up their production and reduce costs. Trying to evolve mainframe computer technology into todays cheap, inexpensive desktop and laptop machines would have never worked -- it had to start from cheap, primitive microprocessors.
"new housing construction" is spelled h-a-b-i-t-a-t d-e-s-t-r-u-c-t-i-o-n.
yellowcanoe
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 965
Joined: Fri 15 Nov 2013, 14:42:27
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Top

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 12:55:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'W')e are in a very remote location and our internet service is provided by a small company that set up a series of microwave towers in the valley and fortunately our ridge top has line of sight with one of the companies towers. For $58 a month we have fast internet service. In the beginning the connection was slow and I mentioned this to the provider and for a one time $ 350 hard ware investment one of their technicians climbed the tower and provided us a dedicated point to point transmitter... (try asking Verizon to do that!)

During the rainy season (now) we have occasional outages. Sometimes the reason is up here on our end, sometimes down in the valley. Anyway, I have been observing myself when the internet goes out. Within a couple hours I start to wonder if this will be a longer outage. If it lasts overnight I start wondering what important emails and Whatsapp messages am I missing. When it goes to two days I start to get anxiety that I am missing some guest inquiries or some important news out there, important family info, etc.

And then when the internet comes back up almost every time there is absolutely nothing important that I missed. And every damn time I ask myself why did I start getting this anxiety? It's never about missing some important content, it is about not knowing what it is you might be missing. It bothers me though, this digital thread that makes it up here and makes me feel dependent somehow, and every time this dependency is only shadows.

The internet has had this this insidious ability to hitchhike on top of this innate sense you have of belonging and when it is removed you have this weird feeling like you out of contact with your tribe. It's all not real though but it triggers this innate sense of belonging that then has the ability of eclipsing organic reality.

I enjoy this site for example and being able to share thoughts with folks all over the world many of whom have world views different than my own and different from most of our guests. This is valuable to me on some tribal level. That part I recognize.

Also that we could not do this project in such a remote location without the internet because of all the logistics required.


Now you understand my statement that the human race is a cybernetic hybrid species of man and machine. Even the Third World is attaching to the network with solar powered mobile phones which connect to solar powered cell towers each of which has a satellite connection if not in line-of-sight to another tower. In fact such mobile devices are doing more than all the missionaries in all the world to spread literacy - nothing motivates somebody to learn how to read or earn an income like a good interactive online game. As they pass into adolescence, they add pornography to their interests.

True story: The Summer of her Junior year in Beloit College, my then 21-year-old daughter asked for and received our aid in travelling to Australia to study the rich ecology of the Australian rain forests and the Great Barrier Reef. Her gestures of rebellion (she was a late bloomer, her rebellious "terrible teens" happened in her early 20's) was a tattoo down low on her back and a pierced navel, both of which she had done in Australia without our permission. (We made her pay with her own money, retroactively.) The point being that in the near future, a teen or young adult gesture of rebellion will be an implanted man/machine interface in their skull. My Grandkids (who just turned 2 last week) might do this, and the thought alarms me.

But I actually believe that both me and you are hybrid man/machines already, entirely dependent upon cyber reality. Today this habit is harder to break than smoking tobacco - I must log on at least twice a day, or I feel spiritually constipated. While at home, I often increase the frequency to 4-6 times per day, and this is probably my favorite haunt.
Image
The Singularity is in the past, Kudzu Ape is now Kudzu Cyborg, and all his habits are unchanged, he has simply acquired new ones. But you and I are also the last generation who grew up without the network, my kid was using a mouse at age 7 and never slowed down. We are unhealthily obsessed, the younger folks either acquire more balance, or vegetate in front of a screen eating junk food, and never reproduce.

But I wince to contemplate what will happen with a Wifi link in your head. Will we learn to recognize those humans who are continuously networked? Will they appear different, with a glazed expression or a distant stare? Will we even know when we talk to them? Will they panic or run amok when they are unexpectedly disconnected from the network or from their cyber family? In 10 years, will PO.com be a network node of interconnected minds which share an interest in FF exhaustion?
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland
Top

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Newfie » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 18:48:10

IIRC wh have a fair amount of bacterial DNA floating around inside our cells, contributing to our internal and immutable programming. At least some hold that, even before computing, we were a. Elsewhere of differing technologies in this fashion.

The idea is explained by Dan Ruskin in his book Mother Nature is atrying to Kill You"

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/181 ... o-kill-you
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Cog » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 21:01:54

Most people use credit cards or debit cards to pay for everything. I have reluctantly started doing that myself for the cashback rewards.

Yesterday saw a guy hold up his phone to the card machine and somehow or other they communicated and the purchase went through. I'm old and cranky so I guess I will attribute my discomfort of what I saw to that. Just seemed wrong dag nabit.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 22:33:37

It's probably worse than you think, Cog. My wife uses her phone as you describe at the Target store. This week they sent us a custom printed coupon book, in full color, containing coupons for everything we have purchased there in the last six months, and nothing but those items.

If you were doing anything but payting in cash, same problem. My supermarket sends me targeted coupons as well, and then thoughtfully tells me how much I saved with the coupons. They are identifying me by credit card, and the most important part of anybody's online dossier is everything you ever bought.

Even most cash purchases are no longer anonymous. The cash drawer is always under an HD camera and the cashiers are trained to stack the bills face up where the camera can read the bill's serial number. Add to that the face recognition file they normally get from your networked ATM, and you are associated with the purchase you thought was private.

Big Brother is watching.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Cog » Mon 12 Jun 2017, 23:35:10

Now this is going to sound a bit tin-foolish and probably is. I keep my cell phone on me all the time. Sometimes the wife and I will be talking about some obscure subject and the wife will say look it up on google when we are wanting an answer about something.

Now maybe google's search engine is getting very smart but when I type in my obscure search item, the query box will try to guess(auto-complete?) what I'm going to ask and the answer is usually at the top of the list. It makes me wonder if my phone is listening to me when I'm not talking on it.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Tue 13 Jun 2017, 00:45:15

No, your phone is not listening. That is not impossible but it needs to be done by law enforcement with a warrant from a judge. What is happening is that the phone number is being associated with your personal search history, and Google is tailoring that auto-complete to your past searches.

Incidentally, the phone can be used for more than eavesdropping. Your phone is GPS enabled, it can also be made to record and transmit a continuos record ofwhere you went and for how long, and both cameras can be turned on with no visible indication they are in use. Again, warrants are needed - in theory.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Ibon » Tue 13 Jun 2017, 09:04:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')
Now you understand my statement that the human race is a cybernetic hybrid species of man and machine. Even the Third World is attaching to the network with solar powered mobile phones which connect to solar powered cell towers each of which has a satellite connection if not in line-of-sight to another tower.


I see how deeply it has fused and penetrated even here. My lowest paid staff now have these cheap chinese smart phones and they cluster at night around the cabins getting Wifi in order to connect.



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The point being that in the near future, a teen or young adult gesture of rebellion will be an implanted man/machine interface in their skull. My Grandkids (who just turned 2 last week) might do this, and the thought alarms me.


That is a frightful thought but somehow consistent. This idea of freedom and rebellion associated with tethering yourself into the cyberborg. It is the ultimate expression of 1984 doublespeak!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')oday this habit is harder to break than smoking tobacco - I must log on at least twice a day, or I feel spiritually constipated. While at home, I often increase the frequency to 4-6 times per day, and this is probably my favorite haunt.


I acknowledge this. I recognize it. I can buffer this with walking into the wilderness at my doorstep and working on an endless list of creative organic projects. I am going to post a link to one of our first blog entries way back in February 2010 announcing when we had the internet installed. Here it is:

http://blog.mounttotumas.com/?p=128

Already then I was acutely aware of the benefit and yet insidious compromise that was made when we got connected. The place beforehand was like some Thoreau type wilderness refuge. Afterwards we slowly got plugged into a global network of contacts etc. and even though this place is still pristine in many aspects we are just one more node in a global network and I still to this day feel something has been lost.

On the other hand I recognize the paradox that I am able to share these sentiments with you and others because of it!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
But I wince to contemplate what will happen with a Wifi link in your head. Will we learn to recognize those humans who are continuously networked? Will they appear different, with a glazed expression or a distant stare?


KJ, we don't have to wait for the Wifi link in the head. It is already there and many are continuously networked and they do look different.

I do not see this as evolution toward some new hybrid cyber/organic humanoid. I see this like a virus or a parasite that eclipsed our social immune system. We never evolved any anti bodies to detect this type of parasite and it is slowly and insidiously herding us.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby Ibon » Tue 13 Jun 2017, 09:30:23

There is another paradox to think about. If I never got connected up here none of you would know about it. Which begs the question, how many places and spaces are out there right now un tethered with folks and happenings that we do not know about. We seem to have a cyber arrogance that anyone not connected is somehow missing out. But maybe, just maybe, there is a whole world out there of creative places and spaces that have chosen to not get connected.

If I was independently wealthy I would pull the plug. But then my wife would refuse to be up here with me. And probably I am not as much of a hermit as I like to think I am :)

But seriously, we should consider that cutting edge might be the invisible places and spaces that refuse to will filly infect themselves with the internet...... we would not know about them would we?

Just something to think about.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: How concerning is the move to computerize everything?

Postby KaiserJeep » Tue 13 Jun 2017, 13:44:23

The insidious thing about the network is the accompanying efficiencies. I am in a local "Nextdoor" app cyber group called the "East Santa Teresa Foothills", 2056 members in the 2484 household area total. We sign up and are a member of a local geographic community of households, where we share resources. Have a surfeit of citrus or tomatoes? Logon and give away or trade away for something you don't have but need. Want to get rid of serviceable furniture or decor items? Log on, post a picture, and leave them for inspection at the curb. Crime wave like graffitti tagging or tire slashing? Log on and you will often find posted security camera footage of the perpetrators.

The latest trend is "supper groups" of 7-10 households, where you only have to cook (or have catered) food one day of the week, when you host approximately 15-20 people. If you don't want to be social, your warm meal is dropped at your door. Supper groups are even being victimized by the homeless stealing the warm meals. So you need a lockbox with an Internet-attached lock and you must logon and use the combination of the day.

But we have been making progress on nailing the mail box thieves. Tips on suspicious vehicles and people who may be casing houses with criminal intent abound.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron