by rockdoc123 » Fri 12 May 2017, 00:26:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hose were the days. The beginning of the modern shale era, it was like being around when rockets were young and seeing all the new and cool stuff going on.
there are a few of us like that.
But what I recognized was back in the sixties and seventies innovative change was quite slow, we got to the eighties and it sped up some but in reality a lot of the really important stuff that has changed the cost structure and lowered E&P risk happened post 2000. Yes there was great things that happened with 3D in the nineties and there were a number of good drilling achievements via new BHA's back then as well.
My experience is that we saw two different types of technology changes over the last couple of decades, there were those driven by low commodity prices and those driven by high commodity prices. When prices are relativley low the industry is looking for ways to do things cheaply, this resulted in a lot of the process innovation that has made unconventionals work (zipper fracs, pad multi-laterals etc). When prices aren relatively high the tech/service companies are looking for the "new thing" that will attract business their way by arguing that it makes their clients more competitive and that resulted in a bunch of new seismic acquisition and processing tech (eg. circular surveys, reverse time migration etc).
I always liked to remind the young folks coming in to the business that there was a time not all that long ago when geophysicists hand migrated structural stacked data...and then were astounded at how they could get better results by running boxes and boxes of punched cards through a mainframe that probably had less power than my desktop at home. And now I suspect you could run any of the seismic transforms from back in the nineties on a normal laptop faster than we ever could back then. Someone is always looking to improve things, faster, cheaper, better results...it is in our nature.
Arguing about what drove the changes is a tough bit of business and almost requires root cause analysis similar to what you would run after a serious HSE incident. Was it the new computing tech available that made everything else work...was it the need to drop costs....was it the need to drill horizontal wells in thin units or the necessity to drill responsibly in environmentally sensitive areas? Just too many potential drivers here. But when the industry was given a challenge they always stepped up. Case in point is ultra-deep water drilling or the MRC wells in Saudi.