by AdamB » Tue 07 Feb 2017, 14:42:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')According to this project US shale oil production should fall by 50% by 2017 and drop to near zero in few more years. This is totally, completely and absolutely wrong.
But of course. No different than many other half baked analysis of these things, the ETP springing instantly to mind as well.
Hubbert Linearization never worked for squat when the Oil Drum debunked it, before the reality of oil production debunked them.
Until folks include the supply response to price, and then lay out that price to underpin their production estimate, they are just pulling a "etp", find two independent variables traveling in the same direction over a period of time, and pretend they will always continue doing so. Works great as long as it works, and has nothing to do with the relationship between those two variables.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagent', '
')Consider just shale oil production from the Permian in Texas. It hasn't peaked at 1 million bbls per day as the clowns who made that prediction said it would---its up near 2 million bbles/day and still going up. And the estimated shale oil reserves in the Permian are something like 60 BILLION barrels---thats as big as Saudi Arabia. At current rates of production it should last for decades.
Would anyone here like to guess where the increased oil production in the Permian is coming from? I'll bet the Rockmeister knows!