by vox_mundi » Sat 11 Feb 2017, 14:19:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'V')ery interesting link Vox. I however am not convinced at this point any individual or collective action can significantly change the dire outcomes set to occur. We simply have too many people on the Earth which itself guarantees a certain impact upon the Environment and Ecosystems. We also have expectation of living modern lifestyles on the part of many currently living, that is also a problem. Finally, the entire argument of us changing as a species is sadly one which has ended upon being disillusioning to many including myself. We continue to exhibit primitive urges and impulses and continue mostly separated into groups who many times do not share common attitudes and are openly belligerent or uncooperative with each other. Our primal nature seems so difficult to control and eradicate. Our intellect and loftier emotions have not been able to sufficiently downplay this more egocentric pleasure seeking and aggressive side of us. So, I see little to warrant much optimism.
I concur, onlooker. On our current trajectory, most scenarios have a negative outcome.
However, the knowledge of these studies may help the survivors avoid repeating the same mistakes. (
Georgia Guidestones)
Here's another interesting study on the relationship between people and the planet which shows that climate change is only one of many inter-related threats to the Earth's capacity to support human life.
Modeling sustainability: population, inequality, consumption, and bidirectional coupling of the Earth and Human Systems $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')

An international team of distinguished scientists, including five members of the National Academies, argues that there are critical components missing from current climate models that inform environmental, climate, and economic policies.
The article, published in the National Science Review, describes how the recent growth in resource use, land-use change, emissions, and pollution has made humanity the dominant driver of change in most of the Earth's natural systems, and how these changes, in turn, have important feedback effects on humans with costly and serious consequences.
The authors argue that current estimates of the impact of climate change do not connect human variables -- such as demographics, inequality, economic growth, and migration -- with planetary changes. This makes current models likely to miss important feedbacks in the real Earth-human system, especially those that may result in unexpected or counterintuitive outcomes.Furthermore, the authors argue that some of the existing models are unreliable. The United Nations projections of a relatively stable population for the whole of the developed world depend, for instance, on dramatic, and highly unlikely, declines projected in a few key countries. Japan, for example, must decline by 34%, Germany by 31% and Russia by about 30% for the projected stability in total developed country population to be born out.12 In addition, countries often highlighted for their low birth rates, like Italy and Spain, are not projected to decline by even 1% for decades.
In this new research, the authors present extensive evidence of the need for a new type of model that incorporates the feedbacks that the Earth System has on humans, and propose a framework for future modeling that would serve as a more realistic guide for policymaking and sustainable development.
"Current models are likely to miss critical feedbacks in the combined Earth-Human system," said co-author Eugenia Kalnay, professor of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science at University of Maryland. "It would be like trying to predict El Niño with a sophisticated atmospheric model but with the Sea Surface Temperatures taken from external, independent projections by, for example, the United Nations. Without including the real feedbacks, predictions for coupled systems cannot work; the model can get away from reality very quickly."