by EdwinSm » Fri 10 Feb 2017, 02:44:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'J')ust the folks that are infatuated with the date of global PO as if it will produce a world radically different then what we've lived thru for the last 40+ years.
I have followed the Peak Oil idea for nearly 20 years. Looking back at that time, even though I knew there would still be plenty of oil being produced on the "downward slope" after Peak Oil, I was more concerned about the psychological effect of a 'Peak Oil Date' having on the general public. And by psychological effect I mean panic, which would turn a difficult situation into a disastrous one. *
I quickly realised that I would never be able to predict when a panic situation would hit. It was just too hard to predict what would be the trigger and its timing [several candidates were around the political situation in the Middle East, eg the House of Saud being over-thrown, or a Saudi vs Iran conflict that closed the Straits of Hormuz].
BUT what I also realise is that a declining oil supply would put more pressure on the system leading to a 'lighter trigger'. Thus a Peak Oil Date would have been an important indication that trouble was near. HOWEVER, through discussions here I was made to realise that we will only see a PO Date in the rear mirror (and then we will probably argue over different dates until the internet system fails).
So, while I would still like to know the PO Date, I realise that as it would be a lagging indicator it is not helpful for planning purposes.

* An example of this was in my late teens in the UK when there was a summer of 'sugar shortages'. It was near impossible to find sugar in the shops. I learned later that the companies were producing just as much sugar as before, but a pattern of panic and hoarding meant a sudden 'shortage in the shops'. Or it is like consumers' response to an oil crisis of keeping their tanks filled rather than just filling up when empty.