by KaiserJeep » Wed 08 Feb 2017, 05:03:29
As long as everybody who contemplates buying one of these high tech motorcycles carries an organ donor card, I don't have a problem. Two and three-wheeled vehicles exist to sidestep the FMVSS (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards), colloquially called the DOT regs. The statistics are fairly grim, drivers of such vehicles experience 35X the number of fatal accidents as do drivers of cars on a per miles driven basis. Thus the organ donor cards, it is how society pays for the greater medical costs of the occupants of such vehicles.
The secret to surviving a collision is to be in the vehicle with the greater mass, surrounded by a stout rollover structure, side impact protection, airbags, auto-tensioning seatbelts, etc. The US Congress has been tampering with vehicle design for decades, and every time they added a "safety feature", the typical average road vehicles got heavier and the motorcycle fatality rate inched up.
I have a regular old bicycle, the ultimate fuel saving vehicle. But I only ride it in daylight, on dry roads, on streets where the speed limit is less than 35 mph, and I wear a helmet and have active LED flashers going. I also accept the fact that I am on a deathtrap in a collision, so I want to minimize the chances of such an accident.
While I can appreciate the economies of 3-wheel and 2-wheel motorcycle class vehicles, they don't offer the same passenger and payload carrying capacity as a standard car, and the same - or even an acceptable - level of safety for the driver. They will never be as popular as standard cars and trucks IMHO, even with $25 per gallon gas. Physics is a bitch sometimes.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001
Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.
Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0