by vtsnowedin » Sun 05 Feb 2017, 05:30:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')What are you talking about? If you have two married workers and they both work the required 10 years or more, then they can both draw social security. Even if one of them made MUCH more than the other, or both are "poor". My parents did, my girlfriends' parents did, etc.
Why make such stuff up?
I'm not making anything up. It is not about do they draw SS, of course they do. It is about how MUCH they draw compared to the taxes they paid in as a couple. The fact is that a married woman in America has been most likely to make about half of her husbands earnings over her lifetime due to the pay differential that persists in spite of current law and the fact that over a career they tend to have gaps and restarts centered around child bearing and rearing.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I did a search on the poor not getting SS, and found this good, relevant link from SS:
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v71n2/v71n2p17.html$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Almost 95 percent of never-beneficiaries have insufficient work histories to gain Social Security coverage. Within this group we identify three mutually exclusive categories: late-arriving immigrants (55.1 percent), infrequent workers (34.7 percent), and noncovered workers, of whom most are state and local government employees (4.7 percent).
So the people not getting it sound like they aren't SUPPOSED to get it, due to the rules. That isn't a problem, IMO.
You're in the strong majority that everyone should get paid. Which is why people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett will get SS, but it's running out of money over time. To me, that makes zero sense.