by Timo » Thu 24 Mar 2016, 10:55:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'A')ustralian farmers deserve a much better deal than they have been getting from the big supermarket controlled set up. $1-2 a liter for milk is a joke considering what goes into producing it. If the Chinese want to pay $8-12 for it & the duoploly of Coles & Woolworths is broken, this is very good for Aussie dairy producers & the regions they farm. Personally I haven't been into dairy since I was a child, which seems pretty natural to me, unlike adults consuming food designed for infants of another species. The worst affected are those in general manufacturing, which is already in deep doggy do anyhow.
This reality holds true for the entire global agricultural production complex. Farmer's do not have any price control over the values of their products. Their products are treated, and traded, as commodities, and as such, they are valued according to market forces rather than production costs. The supermarket realizes that $5 per gallon of milk is not a reasonable price from the consumer's perspective. Hence, they only pay their producers half of what their consumers will pay, thus ensuring themselves of a profit as the producer/consumer middleman.
I'm a city boy who spent his summers as a kid working on a rather large family farm for my uncle. He (and most all of the smarter grain farmers across the world) built massive grain storage facilities so that he could sell his product when the price per bushel was high enough to earn him a profit on his labors. In other words, he could not control the prices paid to him for his grains, and those prices fluctuated on a daily basis. He had to respond to the market in order to earn his living.
To make this point a bit clearer (i hope) put the agricultural industry in the same context as the production of any other product the world has to offer. In nearly every other case, the producer has control over the price of the product produced. Cars, radios, computers, cellphones, furniture, clothes, beer, you name it. Agricultural products fall into the same commodity category as gold and silver and other precious gems and minerals. They are valued and traded according to market forces rather than producer control. Not fair at all. Throw in this reality into our requisite future of feeding the world with an exponentially growing population..............i have no idea how that will all play out.
Edit to add the same ignorance as to how this fits in with and and all global trade agreements. The commodity traders get richer while the farmers continue to be slaves to those who benefit from their labors. I guess.