by PeakOiler » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 20:18:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', 'I') think today’s kiddies are going to be stellar scientists, industry & government leaders, doctors, engineers, lawyers, parents, and all the other good & great things their predecessors are & were, and live a life of luxury greater than anything in the present or past.
So they will be plugging their cars in at night instead of using gasoline, big deal, their children will be better off for it and talking about how we got ripped-off having to use dirty, filthy, unhealthy, environmentally unfriendly oil.
Carry on young solders of sanity & reason and don’t let any of these doomsayers get in your way.
lol
Plugging in their cars using what primary sources and how long will they last?
I appreciate your optimism, but my impression is that wishful thinking is a form of denial.
I was very impressed with the physics article Matt Savinar provided at LATOC under his 'alternatives' section which puts into great perspective the long term sources of energy available to the Earth's population.
Here's the reference Matt provided:
http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p47.html
Have you read that one, Bigg?
Excerpt (example):
"* Coal. The largest fossil fuel resource available in the US is coal. The energy content of the current US reserve is about 5667 Q. If demand remains frozen at the current rate of consumption, the coal reserve will indeed last roughly 250 years.2 That prediction assumes equal use of all grades of coal, from anthracite to lignite. Population growth alone reduces the calculated lifetime to some 90−120 years (see figure 4).
Any new uses of coal would further reduce the supply.
The Fischer−Tropsch process has been used to convert coal to gasoline motor fuel in South Africa for decades, for example. The process requires that one carbon atom of coal be sacrificed to generate at least two hydrogen atoms, and it takes energy to decompose water to make that hydrogen. As a result, the process consumes 2 Q of coal to generate 1 Q of motor fuel. Hydrogen production would require an even greater consumption of coal. The use of coal for conversion to other fuels would quickly reduce the lifetime of the US coal base to less than a human lifespan (see figure 4)."
Please see the other primary sources of energy listed in that article, their estimated amounts, availability, and what scientists will have to work with and struggle with like all the rest of us to achieve the utopia future you believe will be.
Signed,
A Chemist..
...presently employed at this time, but with the sad shape the chemical industry is in at this time due to the higher prices of natural gas and oil, I wouldn't want to be looking for a job as a chemist right now.