by AdamB » Sat 22 Oct 2016, 23:16:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') agree. It's not my theory. That's the way they wrote it, after much deliberation. They wrote it by committee, so this is how it came out. Do you think it will interest people? I hope so.
Peak oil was interesting for a short time, about a decade or so back. Might still be interesting in the future, as long as prices are rising to previously unheard of levels. But when everyone who drives a car during the bad old peak oil days (when prices were $4/gal) notices the prices of now (paid $1.96 this morning to fill the kids car) they really aren't going to be interested, no.
Just another conspiracy, Big Oil gouging the little guy, and things like peak oil or the Saudi royal progression or the Libyan war or Iranian embargo being lifted not mattering much, and to most people, are pretty insignificant anyway, compared to the size of those little numbers they see when they go down for their fuel.
Undoubtedly some will be interested. Of those interested, next to none will understand anything about the science behind the concern, and of those who understand some of the science, only a fraction will understand the interplay between the multiple sciences involved that explain not only peak oil, but why it didn't cause the world to crash, and probably won't in the future either.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"