by vox_mundi » Sat 17 Sep 2016, 12:21:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '.').. The entire message of empowerment that lured us into cyber interactions is looking more and more like slavery every day. This insidious web is eclipsing organic life for more and more of humanity. It is a web actually more arachnid in character than anything else.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '.').. The web is becoming more and more of a filter, reinforcing mediocrity. Those who demand more depth and content are increasingly leaving it and getting filtered out.
... instead of staying within this core function of enhancing the physical and organic the internet has increasingly been creating an alternative reality that eclipses instead of enhances organic life. Social interactions are increasingly cyber, the organic social interactions are being eclipsed. Instead of enhancing organic existence it is eclipsing it with a shallow alternative.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '.').. why would the grip that cyber technology has on us NOT have evolved the way it has. In other words, like oil, like suburbia, like the automobile, cyber technology is just another example of something that has exponentially expanded the power of the global middle class to bloom with mediocrity.
I couldn't agree with you more. I'd like to say it's an emergent property, but the (Invisible) hand of Man (Google) is behind it.
We have become just like sheep; if mediocrity meets a organisms needs, why strive for something more. Also, mediocre sheep are easier to manage.
This is why, for many, playing
Farmville is their only substitute for real interaction with nature.
This article captures some of what your talking about ...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]
Technological nature and environmental generational amnesia$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]
A 2009 article by psychologists at the University of Washington provides a brief summary of some research exploring “technological nature,” defined as technologies that in some way simulate, modify, or mediate our experience with the natural world (e.g., nature webcams, videos, virtual environments, robotic animals). The specific question their review addresses is whether there is a difference between exposure to technological nature and exposure to actual (natural?) nature in terms of potential impact on our physical and psychological wellbeing.
The seven studies they mention suggest an affirmative answer.
For example, one study found more rapid heart rate recovery following low-level stress when a person was in an office with a window that looked out on a natural landscape than when a person was in either an office equipped with an HD plasma screen displaying a real-time image of a similar landscape or an office with only a blank wall to stare at—no recovery differences between the plasma image and a blank wall.Increasing evidence suggests that access to nature and green space provides children with a myriad cognitive, emotional, and physical benefits, such as increased ability to concentrate, improved academic performance, reduced stress and aggression levels, and reduced risk of obesity... Also, and perhaps more noteworthy, they talk about something called
environmental generational amnesia. It is unclear whether they coined the term, but the idea is pretty straightforward:
because the quantity and quality of engagement with the (actual) natural world is decreasing with each subsequent generation, children growing up today will have reduced awareness and understanding of features of nature that their grandparents understood intimately. Environmental generational amnesia is an insidious side effect of the progressive substitution of technological nature for actual experience with the natural world:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]
“The concern is that, by adapting gradually to the loss of actual nature, humans will lower the baseline across generations for what counts as a full measure of the human experience and of human flourishing.”